Photo of the Week

This photo appeared last week as one of the Wall St. Journal’s pictures of the day. It features Stan and Barbara Araelien, former Nortel Networks employees, who appeared at a protest at Queen’s Park.



[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
This entry was posted in Financials and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • protosphere

    “ALL CANADIANS DESERVE PENSION INCOME” the sign reads.
    Not before their big business creditor pals, or their ongoing bonuses it seems.

    Employee severances and pensions are a nuisance liability when further salivating over the cash to loot the corpse.

    After the largest fraud settlement in Canada, that they also tanked with downplayed revisions, before their $20 buying opportunities the green CEO who promoted his pal led by example, always claiming they didn't know any more than the fraud red flags whether at the crime scene or not, reiterating 3 to 5 year fixes in hype to contradictions for so long only to downplay folding, trading options with a board member's firm defending Dunn, and holding so many hostage this long, it was endless…

    These liars were even forced to attend a government inquiry (forced by subpoena!) as to why executive bonuses were paid while they cut employee severances.

    Forced to take the hot seat only to liquidate but fast the very following day.

    All Canadians deserve protection from their life savings being robbed in the markets without the risk of fraud for bonuses too.

    Good to at least see some one bravely protest to the grave injustice. Maybe some one will do something about it, although I doubt it with their enormous legal and political clout with open season on the investor, employee, and now creditor. Perhaps even buyers as they seek to unload units and quickly depart.

    Nortel is bad news. bad.

  • Maz1976

    It's bothers the hell out of me that a huge amount of people that gave so much for the company (20 to 30 years), have to settle for nothing because the lack of judgement and vision of our former “CEO + Friends”.
    And it bothers me even more that that motherf****r wants even more money…….
    I don't live in Canada but I morally support people that fight for something that they rightfully deserve.

  • Friend007

    This and LTD are something that I can't wrap my head around. Why was NT allowed to not keep the plan up to date. I can understand the fluctuations based on market conditions, but not on the basis of contribution shortcomings. Also, there should have been better protection for the plan … may be some type of insurance, etc. to cover shortfall up to certain level.

  • yes4aapl

    This and LTD are something that I can't wrap my head around. Why was NT allowed to not keep the plan up to date. I can understand the fluctuations based on market conditions, but not on the basis of contribution shortcomings. Also, there should have been better protection for the plan … may be some type of insurance, etc. to cover shortfall up to certain level.
    =====
    re
    I know more about that issue than public but I did not dig much.
    I was one of the first to assess real Pension Plan deficit.
    In my estimations it would be as much as $4 bill at the pick…
    Last publicly written articles estimated the deficit at $2.5 bill with requirements to use $0.5 bill cash a year in 5 years in a raw to get the balance to zero. As we know Nortel refused to pay the first portion in 2009 and chose the BK protection.
    I still think there could be a criminal negligence at least in handling the Pension Funds.
    If public does not require investigation of that we would have new cases like Nortel in the future. Employees without severance draining publicly funded EI, pensioners losing their pensions, LTD losing their benefits and greedy CEOs loading their pockets and destroying companies at the same time.
    Disgusting to watch!

  • Resigned_From_NT

    It makes me physically sick to my stomach to see images like this.

    There is something fundamentally wrong with our system when hardworking people who have devoted 10, 20, 30+ years of their career to a company, doing an honest's days work each day, can get completely screwed over like this. Meanwhile, a complete a$$clown like Zafirovski and he his band of criminal friends can literally come in for a few years and rob the company blind.

    Where's the equity? Where's the justice? Where's the retribution for the crimes of Mike Z and others like him?

    I support the fundamentals of which capitalism was built, but this morphed system of crony capitalism in which the super elite can reward their own failures by leaching onto the the blood, sweat and tears of the masses is a disgrace to modern, developed and civilized humanity.

    What an absolute disaster we have created.

  • yes4aapl

    Nortel is bad news. bad.
    ====
    re
    Ok
    You me and few others distanced ourselves from Nortel name as early as 2004
    Therry Matthew, multimillionaire, distanced himself from Nortel and Nortel's culture as early as 2001 I think.
    So why there are liars and frauds like our poster TiC here to come and do the diversion?
    Public with the voice of Robert Verdun in 2001 knew about Nortel's frauds, about accounting books.
    SEC has charged Nortel's CEO of using Teleman as a fiction buyer of Nortel's gear. Will public know about that?
    Just to show the profits!
    How many more Canadian corporations use the same accounting?
    Will public ever know about them?
    Defrauding investors, employees, pensioners, banks, suppliers…..

  • Lookahead

    As Yes4appl said, we should look for a class-action law case to be launched as soon as possible against those who resposible for the damage.

  • Friend007

    Thanks for your input yes4appl. I though there were proper laws for individual level rights protection, but there aren't. If that's the case, there will be less basis for class action law suit. One can argue whether this is negligence or sear incompetency. I think both!

  • Friend007

    I completely agree with you that there should be laws in place for individual rights protection. Can't believe that someone worked for 30 years and retired with a pension, which he/she sees going down 'cos of someone's incompetency and negligence… and nothing could be done!

    As of capitalism…. I think people are better protected under a capitalistic system 'cos it's the system that values individual rights and contribution. One can sue others if they violated his one's rights. Capitalism also doesn't reward mediocrity. Note that Canada is less capitalistic than USA, and has less individual level protection. “Pension” issue being one scenario.

    We often relate greed with capitalism. Greed will always be there no matter what system we follow. There should be proper laws to protect individuals from unwarranted violations.

  • yes4aapl

    Can't believe that someone worked for 30 years and retired with a pension, which he/she sees going down 'cos of someone's incompetency and negligence… and nothing could be done!
    ====
    re
    Do you know how much pensioners would lose?
    I thought it would be 30%
    Am I wrong?
    Have not checked it for a while as I have nobody in my family working for the biggest fraud EVER, Nortel corporation in Canada
    Bigger than Enron! iT'S MY OPINION ONLY.

  • scalppeeler

    Stan and Barbara are at a distinct disadvantage.
    They are white and no doubt christian or agnostic.
    They don't count in current day canuckistan.
    They lived here for generations. Likely raised a family.
    They contributed to society and paid their taxes for decades
    funding the illiterate, the special interest groups, the visible minorities,
    the multiculturalists, official bilingualism, refugees, criminals, terrorists and welfare.
    Stan and Barbara simply don't count. Especially in Ontario.
    If you want to see just how the canadian government thinks and acts with
    people like Bob Rae just read the truth and the facts about Bill C-428.
    They don't take care of their own.
    They don't take care of true contributing Canadians.
    Look it up yourself. Bill C-428.

    Thank you, Carey Miller, who drew our attention to Bill C-428. We knew nothing of this bill and feel we are among 99 per cent of Canadians. As is pointed out, this change allows someone to move to Canada at age 62 and, in three years, be eligible for OAS as well as all the free medical. They will pay no income tax at all in that time as they will be kept very well in the meantime as an immigrant.
    I might add that when someone does come to Canada, they are treated royally and receive all kinds of financial aid that would never be available to any of us Canadians at any age.
    This is more than an insult to all lifetime taxpayers. If there is so much money for OAS, why don't they give more to the lifetime taxpayers?
    Only in Canada does the government care more for other people than its own citizens. All we are to them is tax dollars so they can help out others in order to gain votes in the future. This is absolutely a self-serving bill that was brought to Parliament.
    No doubt there are many lifelong senior citizens living near poverty that could use more assistance and Liberal MPs Ruby Dhalla and Bob Rae are worried about burdening us with people from other countries. Every taxpayer should be contacting their MP about this serious issue

  • jazzybest

    People on Long Term disability could loose up to 90% of their benefits as Nortel
    did not insured disability benefits. The Gov't has no regulation with regards to
    self managed plans. We are in bankruptcy court and fighting like any other creditor. The large creditors have many high priced lawyers fighting for their share which we cannot afford.

    We are been trying to get the Federal Gov't to amend the BIA with no success.
    If you want to help you check this site and sign and mail in your petition. The
    gov't does not except on line petition and still using hard copy. THis is not just for nortel disabled but every disabled canadian whose company might go bankrupt.

    http://nortelpensioners.ca/index.php?option=com…

  • whopperscan

    I feel so sorry for pensioners like this. Nothing to do with them, yet they're impacted. I can't pretend to understand the Nth American pension system, it seems so flawed from afar. The other thing I can't understand is, how come Directors in these systems are not held personally liable? I understand they can take “excess” gains out of these funds (pocket them), and likewise “top up” in busts. Many of the big busts in Nth Am seem to involve unfunded pension liabilities.
    In my own country, it's all in my name from day one, contributions fully paid as I work. Yeah means I wear the market falls personally, but also keep the gains personally.. I control it. Whatever happens, it simply cannot just dissapear like this.

  • jazzybest

    The LTD plan was what is known as ASO – it is basically self-insured and managed. The pot of money is managed internally and we know how good nortel is at managing its money. In Canada, there has been little regulation of self-insured plans. There is no requirement that employers set aside adequate reserves to cover future liabilities arising from these plans. Millions of Canadian are at risk and don't even know it. The trend is toward ASO as it saves money but puts the risk on the employee (who has no idea plan is aso) .There is nothing that forces
    employeer to tell employee risks of plan. People on LTD ( at nortel) had no idea
    plan was ASO untill after bankruptcy. Many in the industry thought this case would prompt government to pass legislation regulating the use of ASO plans. But nothing was done. And 10 years later, along came the Eaton's case. While administered by an insurer on an ASO basis, the Eaton's LTD plan was self-insured and, unfortunately, unfunded. When Eaton's filed for bankruptcy protection its disability plan ceased to exist.

    Disabled Eaton's workers had also counted on their disability payments as a primary source of income throughout the duration of disability up to age 65. Stories surfaced of disabled Eaton's workers being forced onto welfare, borrowing from friends and family, or tapping into their retirement savings in order to survive.

    We are trying to change this with Fix Bia petition:

    http://nortelpensioners.ca/index.php?option=com…

    This issue is not just about Nortel but any company facing bankruptcy which is growing daily..Canwest is next in line….

  • Nortel_Employee_2009

    To all the all the laid off employees and Pensioners, go watch Michael Moore's movie – “Capitalism: A Love Story”. Hopefully the movie will inspire you to keep up the fight for your rights.

    Good luck

  • protosphere

    I was screaming to go on strike before any business units were sold… who listened, who went on strike? Only France did and they got what they wanted!

    May this be a lesson in that united we stand, divided we fall.

    Don't negotiate with ultimatums or terrorists, lest one falls trap to precedents and further expectations in their favor.

    It is too late now as they pay big business creditors with the devoted and hard working employees money. (after they also burned investors who supported them with life savings too).

  • alpha1

    Boy, I wish the government would cover my RRSP losses. In today's age, folks are lucky to even have a corporate pension.
    I made the mistake a buying a lot of Nortel share for my self-directed RRSP … the decision was based on Mike Z's show boating on how good Nortel was doing.

  • scalppeeler

    I think a few of you are missing the point of this article and merging groups that are not in the same situation. Let's be clear here. The article is about Pensioners. It is not about ex employees who lost severance. It is about ex Nortel employees who have been drawing a pension for years in most cases. People who worked hard, contributed to canadian society and supported all the dregs and dirty agendas I already mentioned. These people have been left in the cold by the Canadian and provincial governments. Especially in Ontario. We know what Nortel did. We know how bad Nortel treated the common folk. We know the criminal behaviour that went on there. The government has a responsibility for its seniors regardless of this which they failed to attempt or achieve. They failed their own because they didn't come in here with charter in hand, looking for refugee payouts, welfare or a free ride like they can get will bill C-428 or with many other twisted agendas people like Bob Rae and worse pump on a daily basis. The protestors in this article are at Queens park, not what use to Nortel HQ. Get current and understand the real message here.

  • scalppeeler

    The americans take care of ex nortel employees drawing pensions.
    So do the quebecers.
    The rest of the world does the same.
    Where's McGuinty. Nowhere to be found.
    Too be busy fundraising or giving away money to another special
    interest, minority or refugee group.
    George Smitherman will likely be the next ontario premier after
    doing such a wonderful job with the ehealth scandal.
    Woe Ontario.
    Get out while you can because the government is not
    interested in you if you've been contributing to society longer
    than one 5 years, and especially if you held a job and paid taxes.

  • less

    I've mentioned this elsewhere: Moore has openly supported taxing the rich to the extent they finance free and universal health care for all.

    Unfortunately, it appears Obama's been too busy securing global Peace and Love (successfully! as proven by the Nobel Committee) to provide us his own promised health care reform – yet.

    Unfortunately, without the latter some folks could wind up resting in another kind of Peace far sooner than later, so I asked Moore, a millionaire several times over, to spread some of his ample Love my way, so I might pay my own modest medical bills and move on, so everyone could behold how his health care finance plan worked in a simple, real-life scenario. Show 'em all that the wealthy US was turning another new and greener leaf for the better.

    So far nada. LIke any other rich dude Moore's gonna wait until he's forced by law to become a noble benefactor. And we, the prole masses, gotta pony up our union dues first… listen to the selfless if moneyed experts and vote more wisely forthwith…
    then maybe… just maybe… magical Change will happen.

    The movie says rich is rich is rich is bad, ill-gotten or no. Which is why I didn't pay to see it. Mikes M and Z are rich enough, Nortel left many destitute and the sales tax is supporting wars abroad.

  • Friend007

    Didn't know it was that wide-spread. Thanks for sharing.

  • Friend007

    I haven't looked deeply into it. I believe it is 31%.

  • bankrupt_bob

    <<Nortel® – Customer Update
    Reliable Support • Proven Products.
    Learn About the New Nortel. >>

    …any believers?

  • bankrupt_bob

    WRT your second paragraph… me too.

  • Friend007

    I haven't read C-428, but I see liberalism as a perversion. It isn't good for anyone in the long run. Big government or Govt. deciding almost everything for people is a bad proposition in the first place. An individual typically know how to take care of himself/herself, better than Govt. … unless the individual happens to be lazy, incompetent and one that finds it easy to grow via sucking rather contributing. Govt. typically provides safe heaven to such types of people. The ones that are on the “Contributive” side end up paying for others! (as you have pointed here) Govt. role should be to ensure proper laws, law and order, protection for individual rights and security – national and individual.

    I don't think Canada is attractive for professional immigrants. Immigrants typically know one language – English or French. So, they are out-of-luck when it comes to Govt. or Govt. related opportunities. As for the technology companies, we are loosing them one by one. There are many qualified people unemployed … so there is no room for immigrants. I do know that our immigration system for a long time was geared towards non-professional immigrants, refugees, etc.

    Multi-culturalism – It's neither good for the immigrants nor canadians. I would rather see everyone as Canadian first than Swedish first. Why maintain two identities to the extent that Canadian identity is you second identity?

  • less

    “The article is about Pensioners”

    I expect a handful of new-age smarties out there laughing them as deserving fools for supporting and literally buying into corrupt and flawed old-money schemes: “That won't happen to us. We're votin' fer Bob and rolling our 401ks into some real stock”

  • Nortel_Employee_2009

    From Michael Moore movie….interesting reading.

    Citigroup 2006: America – A Modern Day Plutonomy

    http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/20090907/citigr…

    The latest Survey of Consumer Finances, for 2004, has been released by the
    Federal Reserve. It shows the rich continue to account for a disproportionately
    large share of income and wealth in the US economy: the richest 10% of
    Americans account for 43% of income, and 57% of net worth. The net worth to
    income ratio for the richest 10% of Americans increased from 7.4x in 2001, to
    8.4x in the 2004 survey. The rich are in great shape, financially.

  • Friend007

    It's okay for people to get rich as long as its based on contributions and is legitimate. Rich getting richer isn't a bad thing. However, it's bad to get rich by looting others or the system, which is what needs to be checked. Note that it's the rich people that generate jobs in the end.

    Very few people understand capitalism. If one respects fairness, contribution, and individual rights, then one respects capitalism. Capitalism, in principle, is generation of wealth by value and free choice. Capitalism is not greed, 'cos greed will always be there no matter what system you are in. What matters is the protection provided against individual rights violations and breach of trust (contract) violations…. something that capitalism actually respects in principle.

  • rubdab

    It is 31% at the moment, but the deficit hasn't been revalued yet. At the end, I expect it will be closer to 50%.

  • Nortel_Employee_2009

    Nothing wrong with being rich, but there is something wrong when when an engineer makes 80K while the CEO makes 12M. Can't justify that? Perhaps 10 times more or 20 times more but 150 Time? Come on.

    Particularly when the CEO only had a BS degree in math for a mediocre school and just happened to be from GE.

    Can you justify that? This is just one example, American corps are littered with this.

  • Friend007

    High CEO pays should ideally reflect their company's profitability. I'm okay with them making 12M so long as their decisions make company do well. In Mike Z's case, the money was given/promised to him regardless … before he joined … without proving anything! It's as if he was entitled to it like Obama to Nobel peace prize! Also, I doubt that the people who hired him really cared about company's profitability. So, this isn't capitalism. I would have rather liked to see a reasonable base salary + $$ based on company's performance. CISCO is a good example. Many other US organizations are good examples. I know ORACLE CEO makes tonnes of money, but his company has done very well. Most of these folks who earn based on contributions also end up investing their money, which typically results in good ventures and more jobs. Don't think all their money really stays locked into some locker.

    Higher University degrees don't really matter. It's the contribution and positive impact of the contributions that's the bottom line.

  • Nortel_Employee_2009

    Thanks for making my point.

    I would have been OK as well with Z's 12M salary if the company stock was at $50.

    But I am not Ok with paying someone millions of dollars with absolutely no results. He has his millions, his mansion and his GE pension. What do the engineers have? Nothing. Some of them have lost their jobs already and remainder of them will lose it over next couple of years as they will be made redundant by the companies who acquire the business units.

    End results is that the little guy loses. Big guy walks off with his millions laughing all the way to the bank.

  • Friend007

    I completely agree with you that this is unfair. Nortel was run by incompetent management and board, which could only bring bad luck to the employees. As for us little guys, we should work for the company that values contribution and hard work. There are good companies and good people around. I'm worried about them seen as bad, which is what is happening more and more with liberalism taking hold as time goes by. Nortel had a very liberal work culture … nothing close to being business-like.

    While we are on this topic, one other thing that pissed me was Govt putting billions to bail out GM and Chrystler, while letting NT go bankrupt. I'm not in favor of Govt bailouts at all, but this isn't good if you look into it a bit personally. My tax money goes to GM while my own company (and job) is jeopardized! Do people who work for Nortel not subjected to good treatment 'cos they are perceived to make good money and aren't as many as GM in number?

  • Nortel_Employee_2009

    Agreed.

    However, I think the biggest issue with Nortel culture was the simple fact of “Simple Denial”. Management and board were in utter denial that a company like Nortel could be dire straits, and their thought process was that whatever is happening is an aberration and it will pass if we simply chose to deny it and Nortel will return it it's former glory once again.

    Nortel middle management would actively push the concept of “forced optmism” saying just think positive and work harder and everything will be fine. You will be rewarded beyond your wildest dreams. Nortel management mantra was just close your eyes and think about how beautiful will it be one day and keep working harder. I remember an operations VP being scornful if someone would even challenge the concept of forced optimism.

    We needed a more pragmatic management team who understood the lurking dangers (internal and external) and did something to confront these dangers rather then simply avoid them.

  • linho

    you're not alone. I m as one of many many ex Nortel lost so much money – inside outside RRSP… Who would have thought … who would have known…. Nortel is gone.

  • less

    I made far less than US $80k. I made far less than what “my” Nortel threw in the trash, annually, in the way of cost-avoidance measures.

  • less

    Aye. Lights off in the crappers, vending machines and overhead lightbulbs removed were valuable as exercises in discipline and modesty, but how the hell were they supposed to boost stock even 1/1000th of a cent?

  • less

    Dont kill the messengers, also, don't go idolizing them either. Mike M and Z are rich, so they owe us

  • Resigned_From_NT

    Just wanted to say that I have read some of your posts, including your response to one of mine, and you, my friend, are bang on the money!

    Nice to see I'm not the only enlightened one out there ;)

  • NortelTragedy

    Although I admire most of his work, Michael Moore himself is in the top 1% of wealthiest Americans. He's worth well in excess of $50M.

  • Friend007

    Thanks Resigned_From_NT! Glad to see the appreciation.

  • Friend007

    Agreed with your points. We have/had lots of issues with all the levels of management. There were two things that people like us could have done – fix it or move on. I tried to fix it. I collaborated with many good folks and tried many proposals, but a good chunk of them didn't move. Some did, most of which ended up being capped. In short we became a company where nothing moved! People in the management found it safer to not make any call at all. The second approach – “to move on” would have worked very well for me. The lesson I learnt is – if you can't fix it, move on. It's good to look after oneself.

  • scalppeeler

    “I don't think Canada is attractive for professional immigrants. Immigrants typically know one language – English or French. So, they are out-of-luck when it comes to Govt. or Govt. related opportunities”.

    You are right in that Canada is not attractive for professional immigrants. It is however very attractive to the “non-professional immigrant”. It is extremely attractive for the terrorists, refugee scammers, welfare abuser/recipients, special interest groups, muslim fanaticism, and sharia law to name a few.
    Many of these immigrants typically have control of a few languages but in many cases broken english or french. But that does not matter when gunning and getting a government job. They have visible minority hiring quotas and extreme leftist liberal ideologies to ensure they get jobs for votes and perception. In fact these very people are the ones getting the government jobs. Only in Canada.
    Trudeaumania.

  • Friend007

    Is there any data on the minority representation in Govt. jobs that you can point me to? many of the minority folks in Nortel have had problems getting through the Govt. selection process. I've heard that bilingualism is the bigger initiative to the point that if one is bilingual, one is many notches above anyone else who may be ten times better qualified!

  • scalppeeler

    You are half right.
    Yes bilingualism or being able to speak french and only broken english is the number one qualification for gov't jobs. And yes in many cases they are vastly underqualified but the french variable
    allows them to trump all else.
    After that there are visible hiring minority agendas.
    Just walk into a government building and look at the nationalities.
    That should satisfy your curiosity.

  • NortelTragedy

    Although I admire most of his work, Michael Moore himself is in the top 1% of wealthiest Americans. He's worth well in excess of $50M.

  • Friend007

    Thanks Resigned_From_NT! Glad to see the appreciation.

  • Friend007

    Agreed with your points. We have/had lots of issues with all the levels of management. There were two things that people like us could have done – fix it or move on. I tried to fix it. I collaborated with many good folks and tried many proposals, but a good chunk of them didn't move. Some did, most of which ended up being capped. In short we became a company where nothing moved! People in the management found it safer to not make any call at all. The second approach – “to move on” would have worked very well for me. The lesson I learnt is – if you can't fix it, move on. It's good to look after oneself.

  • scalppeeler

    “I don't think Canada is attractive for professional immigrants. Immigrants typically know one language – English or French. So, they are out-of-luck when it comes to Govt. or Govt. related opportunities”.

    You are right in that Canada is not attractive for professional immigrants. It is however very attractive to the “non-professional immigrant”. It is extremely attractive for the terrorists, refugee scammers, welfare abuser/recipients, special interest groups, muslim fanaticism, and sharia law to name a few.
    Many of these immigrants typically have control of a few languages but in many cases broken english or french. But that does not matter when gunning and getting a government job. They have visible minority hiring quotas and extreme leftist liberal ideologies to ensure they get jobs for votes and perception. In fact these very people are the ones getting the government jobs. Only in Canada.
    Trudeaumania.

  • Friend007

    Is there any data on the minority representation in Govt. jobs that you can point me to? many of the minority folks in Nortel have had problems getting through the Govt. selection process. I've heard that bilingualism is the bigger initiative to the point that if one is bilingual, one is many notches above anyone else who may be ten times better qualified!

  • TwitterCounter for @markevans
  • Seeking Alpha Certified