A Sad Tale from Mexico

When Ericsson purchased Nortel’s CDMA business last month, Nortel employees in Mexico were excited about a new owner arriving on the scene to provide some much-needed stability and direction. Unfortunately, the future of the Mexican operations and its 130 employees is still uncertain. Below is a guest post from Mexican employee about the situation:

On September 3, Nortel’s CDMA employees had the opportunity to breathe a little bit easier. This was the day that offer letters from Ericsson were scheduled to appear on employees’ inboxes. It was finally the time to get out of Nortel and its entire sad story. It was an opportunity to get out of the salary freeze, hiring freeze, training freeze among other cost-saving measures. It was also an opportunity to allow Nortel’s technology and innovation to move forward on a company that could make use of it. Indeed it was an overall happy day in all the sad days through the stream of announcements, at least, happy for US, Canada and China employees.

It all started when an email came out from Richard Lowe that mentioned only NA and China. This was puzzling and alarming to all Mexico employees since in all NSN communications the wording was “North America, Mexico and China”. Equally puzzling was the fact that Lowe clarified that two Ericsson/Nortel communication emails had been sent to potentially in-scope employees only, since it was sent to a distribution list created for offer distribution under the NSN deal.

Immediately after this, emails, phone calls and requests for clarification were made. Was it just an oversight that around 130 Mexico employees were not in scope? Was it safe to assume Mexico was included as part of NA since it handles a vast amount of NA operations? Several days later, the worst was confirmed. The entirety of Mexico was not included, essentially leaving out a huge cost-effective and successful project called “Mexico Center of Excellence”.

However, this was not the end of the story, but far from it. The information around this decision was not communicated to Mexico employees until a few hours before the offers went out for distribution. Late on the day, September 2, there was a conference call hosted by Ron Centis (CDMA Leader). After the news was given, moments of shock, awe, anger and frustration were present on the room. A few moments later, questions started to pour in. When asked about the business rationale behind the decision, Centis was quick to state it was his, and his leadership team’s decision, and that Ericsson had nothing to do with the final decision to leave Mexico out.

As expected, morale went down to the floor. And it will continue like that for a long time. High levels of attrition would not be surprising. It is hard to imagine how a cost-effective and successful project with continuous improvement and higher-than-expected metrics were to be left out.

But wait, that is still not the end of the story.

Being left out of the deal, the worst was expected and assumed: massive layoffs. However, this is not the case. As the CoE is a critical part of the CDMA operations (as well as for several other business units), the CoE will be re-incorporated into NBS to continue servicing Ericsson now as an external outsourced supplier. Translation: Mexico employees will stay with Nortel until Ericsson decides to stop buying services or until work has been transitioned over to another location.

Still, Mexico Nortel employees must keep their metrics at expected levels in order to keep Ericsson happy enough to continue the deal. With no incentives other than the quarterly AIP (whose variable factor is decreasing each time), work must be done to the same or better levels.

A sad tale, one of many to come out of the poorly managed Nortel, whose potential to become a key player on the telecoms field was eliminated by the few people who make key decisions. And still, Mexico employees will come out of this incredibly incompetent communication effort and impossibly business-wise incorrect decision (at least with the tidbits of information available to general population) performing the job as they have always been, and supporting the original decision to move work to Mexico and create the CoE.

With a lot more weight on their backs, and with a lot more people moving on, but getting the job done and demonstrating the potential of an organization that started out with a few engineers and turned out to be one of the most profitable and successful projects Nortel has come up with.


[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
This entry was posted in General, Wireless and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • NewAge

    Do you mean 2 years old Technical Support “KIDS” are better then experienced Americans?

    Funny!

  • Pauljam

    Don't be silly, Nortel failed because it couldn't generate enough revenue to cover its debts. This happened due to incompetence in business planning and execution. It also happened because the so-called leadership were more concerned with themselves than their responsibilities. The argument that there wasn't enough outsourcing is specious and lazy since it assumes that any business will only ever be successful if it is the cheapest.

    Any business can fail for any number of reasons. Nortel failing was not remarkable. What is remarkable is the level of greed, deceit, dishonesty and corruption that has and is going on and the unwillingness of governments to enforce the laws and the way current employees have their heads in the sand.

    We are not all as fortunate as you to still have a job … but your turn will come, you can bet on it, and when it does perhaps you will say some immature and stupid things … again.

  • sameerd30

    There is no CoE of Nortel in India. They (Hackney and Dan Connor) preferred Mexico and Turkey with something in China (GDNT). God saved Indians ..

  • less

    How smart can all those global villagers truly be if they work for – ick – Americans?

  • less

    The assertion that “Several employees in Mexico are successfully leading projects” is too vague to be a “fact”.

    zuperman claims to have seen the same at Nortel, but concluded:

    “throw first stone to İstanbul CoE, please make sure you don't have any guilt because i can easily name 15-20 stupidest North American engineers i worked with along with 3-5 high quality North American engineers”

    Whats similar about Rich and Mexico is NortelTragedy's description:

    “It's not clear the CoE was ever enabled to succeed. Tools are a mess, disorganization, poor knowledge transfer, lack of training, low morale, and the list goes on.”

    Nortel had to drill some holes in a wall, so they hired a guy, gave him a cordless with a new bit and backup battery, expecting him to average 20 holes per hour as the second battery recharged.

    For a while all went as planned until one battery died. Should Nortel waste money on a new backup? 20 hph were still being made, so…

    Then the drill eventually got dull, taking more time and energy to drill each hole. The hph went down and the battery charges became more frequent.

    Still not ready to squander money, hph average was lowered and AC cut off to offset lower hph throughput. Bummerm though, can't charge a battery without AC. though. So why not hire cheap labor with their own drills and let them worry about it?

    Fast forward to today and you see NT holding a drillbit nub in its hand as x number of coworkers turn the entire building around its dull tip.

  • ntgator

    I'll give you that. Your last sentence is exactly what I did. Unfortunately, I know of only one person who left without a reduction in pay. That's just reality. However, leaving the hell that is Nortel now more than made up for it.

    My point is everyone should use this time as severance to make those hard decisions now without the added stress of no income. It was a good run but Nortel is dead and for most, the buyers won't be the answer either. Just look what Nortel did to the countless companies it bought…

  • NortelTragedy

    Well said (except for the last sentence) .. naive but not stupid.

  • less

    “Several employees in Mexico are successfully leading projects”
    is far too vague to be a “fact”.

    Comrade zuperman concluded that:

    “i can easily name 15-20 stupidest North American engineers i worked with along with 3-5 high quality North American engineers.”

    So….

    NortelTragedy summed it up nicely:

    “Tools are a mess, disorganization, poor knowledge transfer, lack of training, low morale, and the list goes on”

    Say Nortel needed holes drilled in walls. They hired a guy, gave him a cordless drill, a backup battery with charger and expected 20 holes per hour as the backup recharged.

    This worked fine until one of the batteries went dead for good. No worries, 20 hph were still being made and AC was saved by not recharging one constantly.

    Then the bit got dull. It took more energy and time to drill each hole and recharge, so hph suffered. What to do? Buy a new battery AND drill? Or hire another guy with their own tools and make it all their responsibility.

    To offset the added cost of wages NT shut off some AC. Yep. Not their problem to worry about recharging no more batteries, no more.

    In the end NT had one person standing there holding a drilllbit nub in their hand as fellow employees turned the entire building around its dull tip.

  • MyHeadHurts

    I think you hit the nail on the head.

    During my time at Nortel, the belief was even if the company was falling apart around you, “we must succeed at all costs” became the mantra. I always believed that the employees had to “fail” some projects to get management to wake up, and realize there is a problem. You can't cut 60-70,000 jobs and say “this is business as normal.” At Nortel, apparently this is called “adjusting to new business realities.”

    The trouble was, if you tried to get a project to “fail” or show red to get attention, your manager would simply work-around the problem. Many Ops-Reviews had “green” status for things that where clearly in trouble. At Nortel it was a art to find the good amist the bad for a ops review. This way your boss, his boss, his big boss and his VP could all say “He we are working hard here. Nobody here but us chickens,” and then team was protected from further scrutiny.

    This is partly why there have been 27 rounds of layoffs instead of fewer bigger ones. Nortel's ability to pay severance was only part of that equation in the cost-cutting machine. When everything is “green” in your Ops-Review managers keep pruning staff from the bottom or your trouble makers. If the team is willing to put in 80 hour weeks all the time, in Nortel that's ok. Anywhere else, management would realize that this is a problem to be addressed. You can do that for short periods of time, not when this becomes the status quo.

    So, as you can see, asides from the brave French team, there is and has been very little way to get the attention and action you need to make change, especially when for years everyone is in job fearing mode. If your boss is feared for his job, he's going to get rid of the guys who raise issues like this, or try to fail projects, because they directly impact his well-being.

    Nortel was a conservative company. Radical changes or rocking the boat in business process meant you where either ignored or dumped from the ship. Bill Donovan has lead business transformation for many years. What is his big contribution? Taking out light bulbs and removing coffee supplies. Business transformation at other companies involves real, painful change. Not just installing SAP and forcing your staff to add layers of more work for 0 realized gain. Bottom-line, in conservative, risk adverse Nortel, making waves meant sinking your own ship.

    Too bad Darwin could not study Nortel. It would be a excellent example of survival of the fittest. In tihs context, fittest does not imply the best workers at their jobs, but best able to toe the company line and keep your boss safe.

  • less

    ?
    I read somewhere that true global villagers sit under trees reciting poetry until the apples fall by themselves; hopefully not from winds caused and exacerbated by global warming.

  • less

    Uh, cucurucucu paloma

  • zuperman

    i ain't 2 years old and i ain't a kid. Please don't call me one. And yes, i am better than so called experienced non-engineer, non-thinker Americans.

  • LonelyOpsGuy

    Who careeessss????

  • LonelyOpsGuy

    Last I heard, he is going to be officeless by the end of October and will be working from home.

  • less

    sn't everybody?

  • globalindian

    Most of the Indians in Nortel got better jobs. Racial snobs like you are stuck up since there was no real competance ever. And since you lament so much about Indians and Chinese, they are atleast not gold diggers. Wake up kid.

  • myname234

    “And why this happened?”

    Racist cronyism to significant extent.

  • scalppeeler

    Let me make a few things clear to you.
    Number one I don't care about indians, if they get better jobs or any jobs at all.
    Two I am all for protectionism in Canada.
    Three I am sick and tired of seeing jobs leaving Canada.
    I blame greedy company execs and the government.
    I'll reach out to india and china with a lighted torch.

  • nortelman

    Mark, did you know that 100% CoE employees received Ericsson offer letter last April 30th?

  • nortelman

    Mark, did you know that 100% CoE employees received Ericsson offer letter last April 30th?

  • TwitterCounter for @markevans
  • Seeking Alpha Certified