Telecom 2.0: The Next Generation of Enterprise Telecom

Here’s a guest post by Jeff Wiener, president of telecom equipment reseller Digitcom, who also writes The Telecom Blog, on his outlook for the telecom equipment market.

No, I don’t have a crystal ball but I wish that I did. I am looking at the next generation of telecom, and wondering where this rapidly evolving market is headed.  I’ve been in the telecom business for 19 years – it’s almost like a 6th sense (although my sense is sometimes off).

With that in mind, let me offer my take of where the enterprise telecom market is going in the short and long term. Keep I mind I’m writing this post at a time when the customer premise-based equipment (CPE) market is at a crossroads.

Nortel’s bankruptcy and uncertain future has left many current and prospective customers wondering where to take their new telecom equipment business. Does it make sense for an existing Nortel customer to spend money on upgrading Nortel equipment, or, as my father explained in my early years in business, “never throw good money after bad”.

In other words, many of my clients are now throwing out their older Nortel gear in favor of new hardware, rather then spend dollars on upgrading their older Nortel systems.

Either way, Nortel is still a large player in the market but their absence at the table has left a void filled by their competitors.  Of course, over the near term this issue will be resolved.

And what will follow in the enterprise telecom market?

In the short term, many customers looking for CPE will gravitate toward some of the larger players such as Cisco, Avaya, Mitel, and NEC. I believe these players will continue to shuffle market share around ever so slightly. There are also some smaller players in the CPE market – notably ShorTel,  Asterisk / Digium, and Microsoft.

Some thoughts on some of these players:

- Microsoft hasn’t become the competitive threat I suspected they might – the enterprise market hasn’t adopted Microsoft’s OCS or Response Point telecom equipment – yet.

- Cisco is obviously making headway into the larger space but their SMB products haven’t been that widely adopted – yet.

- Asterisk, although a threat, isn’t taken that seriously within the enterprise market – yet.  It seems that customers need a “manufacturer” to scream at!

The other spectrum of the enterprise equipment space is the looming threat of Hosted VoIP, Google, and Skype, which is hanging over the CPE vendors like a very dark cloud.

The world is gravitating toward an IP-centric model, and the “cloud” at a rapid pace. Over the next few years, there will a gradual adoption of cloud telephony. In time, the technology will be widely adopted as the technology evolves and becomes more reliable.

As a CPE vendor, I view the threat that companies such as Google and Skype hold over the CPE market with some fear. Not today, but certainly in the future.  Cloud telephony represents a paradigm shift – something to be watched, and shortly, feared.  I am going to label this next generation of telephony as “Telcom 2.0”.

What does Telecom 2.0 look like ?

Speaking along the lines of paradigm shift, the next generation of phone systems will be a highly intelligent server, much as they are now. The talk/communicate medium will not necessarily be the bulky phone on your desk, but rather a variety of end point devices.

Skype, Google, Facebook, iPhone, Blackberry – these all-in-one appliances will be the talk/communicate path, and the server at the back end will bridge these technologies together.  And with the recent news of Silver Lakes (Avaya’s parent company) being part of an investment group buying a 65% stake in Skype, it will now bring together the old and newer emerging technologies.

In the meantime, I’m now watching the race for Nortel’s enterprise asset – the winner will change the landscape considerably.

What do you think? Where is Telecom 2.0 heading?

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
This entry was posted in Enterprise and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • IP Phone goes beyond this however, also implementing a number of advanced features. Despite its' convenient interface that mirrors that of a typical telephone call, SIP is based on an internet protocol rather than that of the telephone industry.
  • less
    Here we go. Nortels went easy on the letter "n" as they described the mood at Enterprise

    http://community.nortel.com/go/blogs/enterprise...

    Exciting Week at Global Conect
    Posted by Phil Jun 15, 2009

    While attendance was down this year from last years record (it was equivalent to 2007), much of this may be attributable to the economy and the venue location. While Pittsburgh wa a wonderful location to have an event like this (and the 6th game of the Stanley Cup fell in the middle of the sessions), there is no denying that it is harder to get to than Dallas or Chicago, a fact that probably reduced attendance from both international and western customers.
  • eluc
    Excuse me if I put again my question but I hope somebody can give me an answere.
    Thank you in advance.

    Somebody know?

    A lot of people talk, cry, screem about that Nortel (CDMA/LTE) was saled but I didn't saw-heard an official declaration from governmet if they'll block or not the sale. I know, I heard about 21 days as term but nothing official, only the Harper declaration from Panama but I didn't take it as last one in this case. Do you think their is no chance that "tomorow" (i.e.) will be a "turnaround" ? (Don't think at our friend Zafi !)

    Somebody know?
  • Lookahead
    there is no need for requiring a government approval, Nortel is a private company. RIM's vioce regarding Canadian National Security issue is just a noise, has no legal sense on the govenment.

    In a nutshell, Nortel garage sell will not be a Canadian government deal, nor an issue seen by the government.
  • RedFlag
    Nortel is a Canadian Company but it's really controlled by USA.
  • nortelex
    I heard Ericsson is supposed to send offer to employees this week so it's a done neal...
  • scalppeeler
    Any rumours on what percentage of employees will be given offering letters.
    Interesting to see how similar that percentage will be to other percentages for employees in other lines of businesses. Probably they will fluctuate depending on the business being sold.
  • normanZ
    From Ericsson the numbers are "good", at least 50% or higher of what is left in the Wireless LC. For Avaya, under the assumption when they win as nobody else is coming to the table, 20% is the low-end target I have heard with not much more on the high end.So out of the 4000 Enterprise that will be left come Sept. 15th, maybe 800...
  • zeroman
    if any red flags had to go up they would have gone up by now. Harper has bigger things on his plate now. His job. The government may be faced with a no confidence vote as early as next week. Elections likely soon. By the time the dust settles, this will be a done deal.

    If this becomes a big election campaign issue, then the other business units are under huge risk of not getting sold. Harper prevents the sale of other units. Liberals enter office and stop the sale. Spells doom for whoever is left unless Nortel exits Ch 11 though highly unlikely.
  • johnchambers101
    Jeff Weener?

    Gawd blogs suck....unpaid for rants. I am not so sure what I should be smoking to believe in this Telecom 2.0 but I need to find some soon. Where are my rolling papers when I need them!?

    Not quite sure how RIM did so well on such technology and F*ckbook is for tweens. Have to laugh at these visionaries. Take a look at what the fortune 100 is spending their $$ on. It ain't Telecom 2.0.

    Funny how this guy thought OCS was going to rock the enterprise world....only if you could interconnect it to something reliably without a PhD.

    Funny!
  • less
    So you think things will stay as they are in enterprise? The tweens in college today are the Mike Zs and Hackneys of tmw and they are fickle, used to having their gizmos up and running, now, even if it means removing their own lame homemade phones.
    As ever, I look to the current Recognized Leaders; what sayeth Nortel:

    http://www.voip-news.com/webcast/act-now-nortel...

    April 7, 2009
    WEBINAR On Demand: Why You Can't Wait...Migrate Your Nortel Meridian PBX Now! Why companies need to act now and upgrade. If you have a Nortel Meridian PBX - This is a must watch event:

    -Ever wonder what impact there may be to your company when you don’t stay current with your PBX's software?
    -Curious to see how your company could benefit from an upgrade to your PBX?
    -Ever wonder why, exactly, you should be considering an upgrade?

    Watch this FREE on-demand webinar, presented by Nortel’s Senior Product Team, to learn why you should NOT wait to upgrade and migrate your end-of-life Nortel Meridian PBX now!

    Hear why an end-of-life PBX can break your network:

    -Avoid the costs and risks of NOT migrating
    -Your benefits of acting NOW
    -Why migrating now and keeping your network reliable means cost savings, productivity and staying competitive NOW
    -Seamlessly migrate your existing Nortel Meridian PBX now to newer, more cost-effective, secure and stable IP PBX or Unified Communications platforms
    -Upgrade your end-of-life PBX now to save costs and drive business in this tough economy
    -Safeguard and grow your business today

    A phone call is a phone call is a phone call. Or is it?

    Without a Powerpoint slideshow and stuff...
  • Teleguy
    Software will dominate the hardware, so the companies that come up with excellent and user-friendly software will reign supreme. This is not an easy task for telecoms who generally suck at the software part because they make it so damn complicated - it goes through 20 iterations designed by Engineers (say no more) and no one can use it without reading 20 300 page user manuals. Make the GUIs as intuitive as possible, add online help that can be found and understood quickly, and keep it easy to use. The future users are the kids who text letters with meaning to each other in minutes. If they can't use it quickly, they will dump it.
  • free_agent
    "Software will dominate the hardware, so the companies that come up with excellent and user-friendly software will reign supreme."

    There is much truth to that. Software-based systems are a game-changer, as they say. The real difference is that software development, while hideously expensive, is a lot less expensive than hardware development, so there are enormous cost drivers to move a function from custom hardware (e.g., all CPE in existence) to custom software on commodity hardware. Nortel has already started doing this with the ACE and SCS projects (or whatever they are called today), and probably others that I am unaware of.

    Once the system becomes software-based, you can afford to put a good user interface on the system, rather than having to have a specially trained "installation engineer" configure the system.

    The result is that the total sales $ go down, because the product becomes cheaper and so does the ongoing maintenance. This isn't going to make either the vendor or the ecosystem of sales partners happy.

    It will make the customers happier, though.

    And since software can pack in more features at a lower cost, customers are going to get more specialized routing and "track down the employee and keep him working 24x7".
  • less
    Hardware keeps getting more compact so I'd argue that it wiil be any easier or cheaper to buy, maintain, repair or upgrade.

    The BlackBerry 8703e can integrate up to 10 business and/or personal email accounts with the BlackBerry Internet Solution. Set–up is simple, and can be done right from the device
    The BlackBerry 8703e works with the BlackBerry Enterprise Solution to provide functionality such as single mailbox integration, remote address book look–up and more


    Month to Month Price $429.99
    1-yr Contract Price $99.99
    2-yr Contract Price $29.99

    Bummer I don't have that kind of money Plus I'd be paying U2 to shill for RIM. RIM is Satan (whenever Cisco takes a day off).

    At that price I'd likely need to buy some kind of replacement insurance for it. A button on it gets wiggly the whole things junk, so I see that mountain of trashed phones continue to grow.

    I can almost smell it: 12-18 months into my 2-year Blackberry contract my employer signs some obscure cost-saving deal with a cheap upstart Chinese company selling pirated phones made in child labor sweatshops and I somehow can't use my beloved Blackberry anymore at work - unless I buy an upgrade or "sidegrade".

    Call me a Luddite now, too, but church and state, business and private must remain separated.
  • less
    Less than 10 years ago not everyone in our large group of lab wanderers had a cell phone (expensive). We carried pagers (provided by Nortel) and the occasional walkie-talkie (needed charging) so we could contact each other. There were a few unlocked workstations handy, too.

    Besides phones on the walls, many of the DMS switches throughout the Rich labs had a phone tucked in a frame from which one could call the boss and/or conveniently talk to a customer while messing with their switch on the MAP right next to it.

    Over time the MAPs and phones disappeared from the labs (cost-avoidance), the 2-3 remaining workstations were locked, but by then most of us carried private cell phones (no more long distance and roaming), occasionally standing in line at a shared workstation to access docs, print, check e-mail and again wait for a response. Or somebody to bring printer paper (rationed).

    Some type of device unifying all comms would've come in handy but, frankly, if I used it for business and pleasure all day it could've been distracting - phone calls, IMs, e-mails, mixed media, etc. And if it crapped out I'da been stuck without quick access to legacy comms altogether, thereby costing Nortel money.
  • Casual_Observer
    We're heading to a commoditized world where it will be very hard to make money off non-value added features. Many of these technologies are mature and converging. The real question is what after the converge ?
  • Moose_Chaser
    >>> " Talent Profile Forms" <<<

    Some sales people are being sent a one-page "Talent Form" to fill out and give back to their managers.

    Not sure if EVERYONE has to do this or just SOME.

    Any insights ???

    MC
  • normanZ
    We all had to do it...We were told (after we filled them out, the management team would not answer the question beforehand) that they are going to "the buyer" a.k.a. Avaya for employment decisions...I am sure it was also used to decide how to cull the herd which is happening in a big way this week. Nice touch by the management teams in getting us to categorize an entire career onto a 1-page powerpoint.
  • Guest
    Is it true the ones from management are blank?
  • GoProto
    "Is it true the ones from management are blank?"
    --------------------------------------------------
    re

    They should be blank.

    Isn't the form asking to describe talent? ;-)
    I rest my case ~
  • scalppeeler
    And they are the ones deciding who goes to the buyer and who goes out the door.
    What is it like being in hands of fate like that.
    If potential buyers had any brains they would personally interview everyone still working there to get real stories and then base their decision on that, but they have likely decided to put their faith in current nortel management due to the sheer logistical requirements of such a venture.
  • TongueInCheek
    What does Telecom 2.0 look like ?

    At an architectural level, my opinion is that Telecom 2.0 will be based on a number of key building blocks.

    1. Centralized SIP-based Call Control - creating opportunity for Hosted Services. This could include centralized SIP Trunk Services with a billing model evolving towards a Busy Hour Call Completion (BHCC) structure. Customers no longer own their trunks, but use centralized trunks in a shared & usage-based model.

    2. Customer Prem based Survivable Gateways and Adaptors to ensure TDM services can leverage the SIP Call Control functions.

    3. Highly Distributed and User Subscribable Applications, all with a web-based interface. Some of these applications will be "Cloud-Based" and some will be deployed within the customer prem to address their specific business needs and security requirements.

    From a user perspective, and as younger people become more relevant in the employee base, they will demand increased authority in how they manage their availability (presence) and subscribed devices. They will want 2 x SIP URI (1 professional, 1 personal) and they will define their preferred devices by time of day, SIP URI and their skillset and how it matches to business tasks. They will want this environment to be web-based so they can dynamically make changes from their iPhone or Blackberry on the fly as well.
  • chawk
    Nortel's ACE already provides some of the presence and accessibility control that this and the next generation of workers are starting to demand. ACE has a Blackberry client in addition to the web portal, allowing for users the ability to manage their availability and presence almost anywhere.

    I have seen traction with traditional infrastructure-based voice solutions from companies like Nortel being offered as managed services from our carrier partners, and believe that this can help keep manufacturers relevant and profitable while they're making the switch to truly virtual technologies. For now, the proven functionality, reliability, and scalability of Nortel's Succession platform delivered as a service (hence w/o the capital expenditures) provides a very compelling value prop for most any enterprise customer.
  • normanZ
    ACE will be one of the first acroymns to die come Sept. 4th when no other bidders come forward and Avaya wins the booby prize. They could have bid $200M for the whole thing and still won...Bet they are kicking themselves for putting in to high of a bid...
  • less
    Ah, yes:

    http://www.nojitter.com/blog/archives/2008/06/n...

    Nortel Plays Its ACE
    Jun 5, 2008
    Global Connect 2008, the annual Nortel Enterprise customer conference, was held this week in Grapevine, TX. Nortel reports that attendance was up 41% over 2007 – making for a very happy team of Nortel executives.

    The mood of the meeting was near-ebullient. There is a strong sense that the tide has turned– after some clearly troubled years, enterprise revenues have been up for seven consecutive quarters. The Microsoft relationship has not led to the demise of Nortel as we know it, a scare tactic used against Nortel by competitors after the alliance was initially announced.


    k. Noted. Nortel (Enterprise) rocks. Who even comes close?

    Probably the solution on the market that most closely compares to Nortel’s Agile Communication Environment is Avaya’s Communications Process Manager. Based on discussions with Nortel at this week’s event, ACE also appears to include federated presence capabilities that Avaya makes available in a separate product, the Intelligent Presence Server. Federated presence is key for environments where users may choose disparate clients, e.g., some using Microsoft’s Office Communicator, others IBM SameTime, etc.

    One of the core messages for both the Avaya and Nortel solutions is to solve the problem of “human latency” in business process, that point where a process comes to a standstill because some human has to intervene for the process to continue. An example used by Nortel is the situation where several doctors have to agree on the discharge of a patient. Delays in this process could be avoided via a process to allow a response to an IVR or voice portal response (press 1 to authorize discharge, press 2 to request additional data, etc.)


    No irony there. But, damn them humans and their interactions, anyway. Synergize Nortel ACE with Ayava CPM and the operation could be a success even if the patient remains dead.

    That aside, the "make it look like it was their idea and they'll fall for it" trick still works on youngsters. I'd like to see how this stuff is supposed to be - or, infinitely more signficant: remain - cheaper and safer down the road when increasingly combined with private (read selfish) interests.

    Who is ultimately gonna pay for the above-mentioned devices, 2 x SIP URI, their countless upgrades, patches, etc. these growing "clouds" will invariably impose upon us all? Will owning an iPhone soon be prerequiste to landing an office job at Microsoft?

    Once Nortel Enterprise is ressurrected do I bring my own Blackberry or will Hackney provide one or two? Will my personal line be free, or do I have to contact ISPs and phone companies in faraway low cost centers of excellence to set up a service change/ payment plan?

    Wheres that server with the addional software I need? How about RAM and bandwidth? How much time am I going to spend keeping everything current, compatible and who is gonna pay for that along with the software peeps' salaries?

    Will I be encouraged to not worry about annoying little details and just get with the program?
  • zeroman
    'happy team of Nortel executives'

    thats when I stopped reading. execs will show their teeth at anything now.
  • GoProto
    "Will I be encouraged to not worry about annoying little details and just get with the program?"
    --------------------------------------
    Yep you will

    On another note:
    Awww... "a very happy team of Nortel executives", just makes you want to beam your best smile.. so cute !!
    Ugh!
  • zeroman
    in case you did not know Canada took FB to court for privacy infringement. FB is now turning off application access to your private info. Apparently even if your friends used apps, they could see your data as well.

    FB is good in its present free form. The moment they put ads and exploit the database to sell something, it is going to backfire. but then some people will still tweet or fb their status even if they are taking a dump in the toilet.

    20 mins a day on company time is a nightmare for companies. that is 100 hours wasted in a year or 12 work days. almost like vacation. it is only going to increase so the smart companies are shutting access.
  • GoProto
    I have watched the youth in the US move from AOL IM to myspace to Facebook and now the latest "if you want to be current" only cool thing is Skype. The kids in college all have laptops, and all Skype. They have already moved on from the other sites, and only "check" their other sites, but don't hang on them anymore and once that happens, it's a done deal..
  • less
    Its almost inevitable that all the expensive equipment with our lives/livelihoods on it will be moved low-cost centers of excellence abroad, thereby reducing our evil carbon footprint whilst spreading global commerce.

    We will access It All with a simple, handheld 5G wireless device (built in low-cost centers of excellence abroad, natch) that offers HDTV, streaming music, real-time stock quotes, GPS, digital blood pressure meter, "Guitar Hero", etc. for only $59.99/month (if you act now!).

    Luddites argue that the Internet was invented to share data, for free, not hide it out there only to be declared "stolen" later. Forbes writes about security:

    http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2009/0907/technolo...

    Putting content online is a risky game. You could win an audience measured in the millions and lose control of your work to pirates. Slapping a digital padlock on content could protect you. But it could also turn off consumers altogether.

    Talal Shamoon, chief executive of Intertrust Technologies believes he has an answer. Intertrust holds a treasure trove of patents that help content owners manage digital rights; it has spent five years and tens of millions of dollars developing a standard called Marlin, which aims to keep content secure in a way that legitimate consumers won't find offensive. Now all he has to do is convince telecom providers, gadgetmakers and consumers that his plan will help them--and that it keeps content under their control, not his.


    In the same issue Forbes addresses the Luddites' complaints that the Internet lacks privacy:

    http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2009/0907/power-wo...

    Facebook has more followers than Buddha but not much money coming in. When Sandberg joined, the site had a crazy market valuation of $15 billion but was on track to lose perhaps $150 million on $350 million in revenue. But the site was on a tear, quintupling its number of users between 2007 and 2008. Members were spending an average of 20 minutes per day on Facebook, sharing their names, professions and educational backgrounds, uploading photos, talking about their relationships and how they spend time, discussing their favorite movies, books and restaurants. It was a virtual passport to millions of psyches-- and wallets.

    Zuckerberg knew he was sitting on a potential gold mine. But his efforts to exploit user information provoked outrage among members, who felt their privacy was being violated. In September 2006 Facebook introduced News Feed and Mini Feed, which gave members perhaps too much unfettered access to details about one another's lives; users complained they felt cyberstalked. Zuckerberg apologized and made it easy for members to control their own minibiographies.
    A year later he launched Beacon, which automatically sent ads to Facebook users whenever their friends bought stuff on a group of sites, including Amazon, Travelocity and Ebay. That backfired, too: 50,000-plus members signed an online petition against the program. There was another mea culpa and retreat.


    I see a future in which terrorists (i.e. haters who can't afford a Blackberry) need only need cut a few fiber cables under their hometown villages to cause mass calamities/casualites - "blinded" SUVs run off the roads, stock markets crash, global CEOs aren't alerted to take their meds in a timely manner.
    Their teen daughters commit suicide because they can't buy tickets to Miley Cyrus via their Barbie Handheld, nor will her concert stream on the cell phone; their brothers go a rampage cuz "Hero" iz dwn & that #$#$ SUX.

    I expect it would take a few $500 mio and 12-18 months to fix everything, after which the CEO's widow receives a virtual coupon for hubby's heart medication prescription: "We missed youR!" sent from an automated center of excellence somewhere far away, but definitely feels her pain.
  • qcboris
    The days of having a big box with Nortel or Avaya on the front in the server room running the phone systems are diminishing fast.

    The incumbents have been successful in spreading FUD on Asterisk in the medium enterprise and above (although with a good techical team to install and configure it can be as reliable as the big boys).

    SMB customer are happy to have something that works at a reasonable price and combined with hosted PBX (which can easily be Asterisk under the hood) this is eating away at the small system market and moving up. Google voice is going to evolve into something similar for hosted and who know what the plans for Skype are but there were probably a few charts on hosted pbx for smb buried in the powerpoints that made the rounds for investors.

    Asterisk has lowered the barrier to entry into the pbx business, and combined with hosted pbx and the new service providers, things are going to be the same fo pbx vendors.
blog comments powered by Disqus
  • TwitterCounter for @markevans
  • Seeking Alpha Certified
Data Recovery