John Manley’s New Gig

With Nortel now holding a multi-billion dollar garage sale, Nortel’s senior executives and directors will soon have a lot more time to take on new assignments.

John Manley, a Nortel director since 2004, has already lined up a new gig. In October, set up shop at the offices of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, and become its president and CEO on Jan. 1 (For more, check out Maclean’s).

A interesting comment by Manley about why Canada’s economy needs more innovation to thrive.

“I don’t think you could say that innovation is deeply in the DNA of our Canadian business enterprises. We have built prosperity, up to and including this decade, on a fairly basic paradigm: we are rich in natural resources. We’re good at harvesting them. And we have built a manufacturing and processing sector, and to some degree a services sector, which has been quite successful in exploiting access to the U.S. market.”


[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
This entry was posted in Executive Suite and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • scalppeeler

    Let's break down what Manley sand and at the end I'll summarize the general positions of the federal, provincial and municipal governments in Canada and Ontario.
    You decide if it is time to leave, revolt or make it very difficult for this line of thinking from the politicians to survive. You can make a difference.

    ““I don’t think you could say that innovation is deeply in the DNA of our Canadian business enterprises”
    Translation–>> We have no use for nortel, technology or anything innovative. We pull oil out of the ground at an exponential pace and we bail out a dying auto sector that does NOT put canuckistan on the map in any way shape or form.

    “We have built prosperity, up to and including this decade, on a fairly basic paradigm: we are rich in natural resources. We’re good at harvesting them.”
    Translation–>>I repeat we are great at pulling oil out of the ground and selling it around the world. Our climate is conducive to crops/agriculture and our vast land mass makes it a leading exporter of natural resources. You'd have to be retarded or a terrorist not to make this work. Talk about being handed things on a silver platter. Even I could not screw this up. Trudeau and the libs are trying with the charter and multiculturalism, but this stuff is beyond even their reach.

    “And we have built a manufacturing and processing sector, and to some degree a services sector, which has been quite successful in exploiting access to the U.S. market.”
    Translation–>> I say for the third time bailing out the auto sector is a must. If companies do not do manufacturing in Canada (like Nortel) we have no use for them. That also means we will turn our back on the white collar, technical, engineering, designer/developer who isn't actually manufacturing but is connected to Nortel. They don't matter. They should get hard hats. We don't want you. And tell me how could we screw up Access to the U.S. The population of california and yet a larger land mass than what 300 millions inhabit. We're not mexicans.

    Summary–>> Get our shovel and your rubber boots. Keep drillin that oil. Keep drywallin, road constructing and grass cuttin. My pal Dalton and I are on this bandwagon. Multiculturalism will save us all and the knowledge I've learned from tutoring and mentoring mike Z and the rest of the Nortel BOD more than qualifies me to be on the council of chief executives. I expect to be the top dog there in less than a year.
    Oh Canadud.

  • darius711

    this post is invalid as it does not contain references to multiculturalism, immigmants, refugees, women, invalids and children that are a burden on the working canadian man. wait.

  • Compass

    Manley is a half-wit.

    You have to be a half-wit to be a Nortel Executive or Board Member – it's one of the qualifications.

  • scalppeeler

    You mean yours?

  • GoProto

    Who give a sh*t now what he has to say. none of it is relative to NT.

  • scalppeeler

    That is just it.
    Nothing manley ever did or say was relevant to Nortel.
    He already proved that.

  • GoProto

    B-I-N-G-O

  • protosphere

    http://www.financialpost.com/scripts/story.html…

    As a former politician, John Manley understands that the politically expedient thing for policy makers is to over-regulate in the aftermath of major events — a financial crisis, for example — to ensure history does not repeat itself.

    But in his new job as president of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, the former deputy prime minister and finance minister said it will be his task to persuade policy makers to think before regulating.

    “That's entirely appropriate, but we have to make sure that regulation is not stupid, that it doesn't lead to a loss of innovation and entrepreneurial-ism, because that is what will ultimately lead the economy to recover and to respond.”

    (look what fraud did to the economy and shareholders and he wants less regulation?)

    “He is currently senior counsel at McCarthy Tetrault, and sits on the boards of Nortel Networks Corp.,…”

    (McCarthy Tétrault is the law firm representing Frank Dunn who Nortel fired !!!)
    __________________________________________________________

    1.) John Manley is currently senior counsel at McCarthy Tetrault, and sits on the boards of Nortel Networks Corp.,
    2.) McCarthy Tétrault is the law firm representing Frank Dunn!
    3.) Frank Dunn is suing Nortel for wrongful dismissal (as fraud charges loom on both sides of the border)

    How can a board member's law firm where he is senior counsel defend a fired CEO who is suing the company he sits on the boards of? How is this legal and not a conflict of interest.

    Nortel refused to chase past officers even after repeated requests, following the fraud, and instead they spent a million bucks defending a handful of them… Manley traded his traditional options for cash ( a stunt that created and not seen since bonusgate options for cash scandal) amid bankruptcy when they were cutting severances while increased lawsuit insurance to $300M who's premiums like their new legal fees get paid before creditors… and this guy wants less regulation…

    __________________________________________________________

    http://www.canada.com/topics/news/story.html?id…

    In a statement released after the charges were announced, Dunn’s legal counsel, McCarthy Tetrault LLP, stated: “We are confident that the evidence will demonstrate that Mr. Dunn acted honestly and diligently in the interests of Nortel’s shareholders and employees at all times, and that he will be acquitted of these charges.”

    “In this challenging business environment, Frank Dunn rescued the company by implementing a painful and massive companywide restructuring plan,” his legal filing declared.

    Beatty and Gollogly are suing Nortel for wrongful dismissal.

    http://www.thestar.com/article/446516

    McCarthy Tétrault, the law firm representing Dunn, said it expects him to be acquitted.

    “We are confident that the evidence will demonstrate that Mr. Dunn acted honestly and diligently in the interests of Nortel's shareholders and employees at all times,” the law firm said in a statement.

    Dunn is suing Nortel for wrongful dismissal.

  • Milan_Bekich

    “…And we have built a manufacturing and processing sector, and to some degree a services sector, which has been quite successful in exploiting access to the U.S. market.”

    Hmm … makes Canada sound like a nation of lampreys. I thought that only described Quebec. Mea Culpa.

    Milan

  • yes4aapl

    QWhy people like Manley with the history of failures are still trying to lead the country?
    In other countries /Europe/ if you_public see wrong doings with a naked Eye, the person_politician is finished!

  • scalppeeler

    Cause Canadians have no backbone.
    They just bend over backwards apologizing to everyone.

  • protosphere

    In England they outlawed bank charges, Greece outlawed casinos yet our NDP of all parties passed this at a pen stroke, than the mob in a wile west town after years, even Europe got Microsoft on Antitrust where NorthAmerica could not or didn't… there are multiply more millionaires in Europe too and by far greater injustices here. Yet we North America commands the greatest clout in so many areas.

    I shake my head at the supposedly most advanced countries who's crime rates and scandals don't bode well when policing the globe under the guise of human rights and compassion.

    Major change is always well overdue here, and since we can not socialize into the masses as in Europe, perhaps greater humanities education is in order, an education our mean spirted Harris wanted to scrap too for its relevance to the work force.

    We also have to be careful to institute the right policies in our great Canadian Establishment that might get warped by grandfathering an elite, after all, we don't know how the kids will turn out, …but all this will change in a decade or 2 with immigration reversing who the minority are =) Less cronyism and more performance based leadership.

  • Moose_Chaser

    John Manley is not manly.

    He is a wooden-faced puppet of whatever SIG (Special Interest Group) yells
    the hardest for him. In short, he is a LIBERAL !

    He stands for nothing. He IS nothing.

    MC

  • scalppeeler

    I see the via union won.
    More money for the union.
    Just like the ottawa bus drivers.
    Just like the Auto Assemblers.
    You want to make it in Canada be in a union.
    Jimmy Hoffa is alive and well in Ontario.

    The Ottawa Police want to have their budget increased by at
    least 15 million dollars, however 83 percent of that budget already goes
    into just paying salaries, something is just wrong with that number, no
    business could operate with a labor cost that high and this means that this
    is just another case of Unions having to much of a stronghold in this
    Country. One of our leaders should have the guts to simply fire the whole
    police force, therefore disbanding the union and then re-hire the police force
    on an individual salary review.

    Canadian Taxpayers are going to be on the hook again
    for who knows how many millions of dollars for hearings
    about Air India which went down near Ireland.
    Air India is not a Canadian company, the bombers were not
    Canadian, most of the victims were not Canadian and the plane
    did not go down anywhere near Canadian soil, stop wasting
    Canadian Taxpayers money.

    The Federal Government should look into the office of
    Stephan Lewis, the odds are quite high that he had
    something to do with the planning of those 150 people that claimed
    refugee status from the Aids Meeting. Over the last sixty or so years
    the West has given the third world Trillions of dollars in aid, most of
    which landed in the hands of tin pot dictators to buy weapons that
    they use to kill their own people, it is time the West cut off all aid
    to the third world and let them learn how to survive or die on their own.
    Those 150 people are here illegally, send them home.

    Corruption : Anyone that is Liberal.
    Trudeau was the worst one, he ruined the Country with three Bills,
    Multiculturalism, Bilingualism, and the Canadian Charter of anything that is not Canadian Rights.
    Chretien, What he did was obvious.
    Martin, I did not know that he was a Native, but he must
    be because his Company pays Tax to a foreign Country.
    For all we know the Liberals may have funded the FLQ.

    Most people may feel that all the Political Parties are equally untrustworthy,
    however in recent history the main fact is that the Prime Ministers have
    all been from Quebec.
    Harper will be tossed and a new one from Quebec will emerge.
    Canada has far two many parties.
    Should be just two like the U.S.
    Dump the block and the ndp..or keep the ndp and dump the liberals.

  • Another_Nortel_Watcher

    I'm so confused. Why would an organization of business CEOs choose someone who has never been a CEO to lead them? He doesn't understand their challenges. Is this a government lobby organization? If so, do these people not realize that Manley is a failed liberal?

    I just don't get it.

  • NortelTragedy

    What is a Canadian liberal in context? In the US a liberal is generally left-wing, union supporting, pro choice, social systems, gun control, etc.

    I don't see how he [Manley] supported the people at all – employees, pensioners, shareholders – how is he “liberal”? In fact, he looks to be what I would consider a pro-business stance, more Republican.

    I ask the question wanting to learn, not to flame any US versus Canada or Right versus Left debates.

  • 4merEmployee22

    Does this mean that he will no longer serve as a NORTEL BoD by October 2009?
    Will jump ship then?
    NORTEL is asking for another extension of
    stay to October 30, 2009.
    Isn't the Bankrupcy Court Judge not tired of this yet?

  • scalppeeler

    Let's be clear here.
    There never was a board of directors at Nortel.
    It was in name only.
    In reality it was the balcony muppets.
    The only thing they directed was misdirection.
    Who cares when or if manley jumps ship.
    The ship has sunk.
    The only explanation for an extension is they don't plan to
    have Enterprise, MEN, CVAS or LTE patents (if any left) sold off by then.
    They are probably throwing out a worst case date.
    Interesting to see what will be left of Nortel Christmas Day.
    I wonder if even the name will exist.
    Likely all that will be left are small businesses that were part of Nortel
    which nobody wanted. They'll likely kill them off in a years time.
    I can see the Zmails now from mike to the three dozen employess left at business
    services.

  • AlemdagCaddesi

    Canadian Council of Chief Executives? Who else is on this Council? Perhaps some of these guys: Wesley Mouch, Orren Boyle, James Taggart, Mr. Mowen, Paul Larkin…

  • Another_Nortel_Watcher

    In Canada, the party you belong to is the one most likely to get you elected in a given region. It's a sham.

  • 4merEmployee22

    GOOD QUESTION! I was wondering about that too?
    Just how did he get that position? Was he appointed or annointed?

  • Theleftbehind

    Don't worry. He will recommend Mike Z to this group when he is finished with Nortel. Probably Frank Dunn too.

  • darius711

    this post is also invalid as it does not contain references to liberals, multiculturalism, bilingualism, third world refugees, the travails of the great working canadian man…are you ok this morning, scalpcutter?

  • GoProto

    “John Manley is not manly” — :-) good one

    “He stands for nothing. He IS nothing”
    Maybe he should have been cast for a role in Seinfeld.. a show about nothing.

  • zeroman

    Hail Manley.

  • zeroman

    yes it is a looby group primarily. he gets paid to lobby, influence and peddle his contacts.

  • Friend007

    However sad I feel, I think Manley is right in his comments. Canadian economy is natural resource based and is becoming more so. I have Professor friends at university who tell me that NSERC has been questioning funding for ASIC and nanotechnology research 'cos they don't see significant job creation in those areas. I think Govt. policies are primarily driven by the industry dynamics/demands/jobs/etc … and aren't really creative on their own. In the end, the private industry has to do well and be strong.

  • we3

    Here is one of the goals of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives http://www.ceocouncil.ca/en/innovation/research…

    Some of the info on the site seems soemwhat Dilbert-like given the distinct lack of action by all of the political parties on the Nortel file as it colapses into oblivion.

    “Research and Development
    Maintaining a business environment that encourages more world-class research and development to be done and to be put to use in Canada is essential to our future prosperity.”

    “The federal government has done a superb job in recent years of boosting support for research and development through Canada's universities and colleges. Enhancing the supply of highly trained researchers, and enabling them to carry out leading-edge research, provides an important foundation for Canadian competitiveness.”

    “The next step is to encourage more successful commercialization of university research. Canadian universities spin off twice as many start-up companies per dollar of research as their American counterparts, but receive only half as much in licencing revenues. Canada appears to be good at starting businesses based on research. Now it must improve its record at growing these businesses.”

    and:

    “Canada's tax incentives for industrial research are among the most generous in the world, but two issues need to be addressed. First, the tax credits are of limited use to small start-up companies that have yet to become profitable. Second, while the R&D tax credits encourage companies to conduct research in Canada, other aspects of tax policy appear to discourage companies from exploiting the results of such research from a Canadian base.”

    I wonder how John will explain the loss of Canada's largest and most significant technology company over the past several decades, even while someone of his stature and political connections was sitting on the board. Seems like when push comes to shove, the political will was not there to step in and take action in our non-unionized knowledge worker institutions. So, what will Canada get out of the Nortel collapse? Our political institutions seem incapable of ensuring that any of the past investments in SRTCs and Education will result in anything for Canada. Oh well, back to hewing wood and selling off our oil and gas I guess. Even when a Canadian company overcomes obstacles and somehow becomes a global player, we seem predisposed to let them die without a murmur of discontent.

  • protosphere

    Manley has acquired a stellar reputation, much like Zafirovski before he arrived.

    Zafirovski seemed like the pinnicle of honesty, trustworthiness, integrity and a person you can truly trust.

    May I reluctantly suggest actions speak by far louder than words. In all fairness it may take years to establish a good reputation and just one stinker to ruin it all.

  • scalppeeler

    Get in yer paddle and push off.

  • Friend007

    However sad I feel, I think Manley is right in his comments. Canadian economy is natural resource based and is becoming more so. I have Professor friends at university who tell me that NSERC has been questioning funding for ASIC and nanotechnology research 'cos they don't see significant job creation in those areas. I think Govt. policies are primarily driven by the industry dynamics/demands/jobs/etc … and aren't really creative on their own. In the end, the private industry has to do well and be strong.

  • we3

    Here is one of the goals of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives http://www.ceocouncil.ca/en/innovation/research…

    Some of the info on the site seems soemwhat Dilbert-like given the distinct lack of action by all of the political parties on the Nortel file as it colapses into oblivion.

    “Research and Development
    Maintaining a business environment that encourages more world-class research and development to be done and to be put to use in Canada is essential to our future prosperity.”

    “The federal government has done a superb job in recent years of boosting support for research and development through Canada's universities and colleges. Enhancing the supply of highly trained researchers, and enabling them to carry out leading-edge research, provides an important foundation for Canadian competitiveness.”

    “The next step is to encourage more successful commercialization of university research. Canadian universities spin off twice as many start-up companies per dollar of research as their American counterparts, but receive only half as much in licencing revenues. Canada appears to be good at starting businesses based on research. Now it must improve its record at growing these businesses.”

    and:

    “Canada's tax incentives for industrial research are among the most generous in the world, but two issues need to be addressed. First, the tax credits are of limited use to small start-up companies that have yet to become profitable. Second, while the R&D tax credits encourage companies to conduct research in Canada, other aspects of tax policy appear to discourage companies from exploiting the results of such research from a Canadian base.”

    I wonder how John will explain the loss of Canada's largest and most significant technology company over the past several decades, even while someone of his stature and political connections was sitting on the board. Seems like when push comes to shove, the political will was not there to step in and take action in our non-unionized knowledge worker institutions. So, what will Canada get out of the Nortel collapse? Our political institutions seem incapable of ensuring that any of the past investments in SRTCs and Education will result in anything for Canada. Oh well, back to hewing wood and selling off our oil and gas I guess. Even when a Canadian company overcomes obstacles and somehow becomes a global player, we seem predisposed to let them die without a murmur of discontent.

  • protosphere

    Manley has acquired a stellar reputation, much like Zafirovski before he arrived.

    Zafirovski seemed like the pinnicle of honesty, trustworthiness, integrity and a person you can truly trust.

    May I reluctantly suggest actions speak by far louder than words. In all fairness it may take years to establish a good reputation and just one stinker to ruin it all.

  • scalppeeler

    Get in yer paddle and push off.

  • TwitterCounter for @markevans
  • Seeking Alpha Certified