RIM Wants In On Nortel’s Wireless Auction

Now this is something I didn’t expect: Research in Motion wants to make a bid for Nortel’s CDMA and LTE businesses but it was told by Nortel and its legal advisors that it could only get involved if RIM agreed not to submit offers for other Nortel assets for a year. (Source: Globe & Mail).

RIM, which makes the popular Blackberry smartphones, said it was prepared to bid about $1.1-billion.

“RIM remains extremely interested in acquiring Nortel assets through a Canadian ownership solution that would serve the dual purpose of keeping key wireless technologies in Canada and extending RIM’s leadership in the research, development and distribution of leading edge wireless solutions, but RIM has found itself blocked at every turn,” said Jim Balsillie, RIM’s co-chief executive officer, who earlier this year unsuccessfully attempt to buy the NHL’s Phoenix Coyotes. Balsillie went on to say that RIM is “extremely disappointed that Nortel’s world leading technology, the development of which has been funded in part by Canadian taxpayers, seems destined to leave Canada and that Canada’s own Export Development Corporation is preparing to help by lending $300 million to another bidder. RIM remains extremely interested in acquiring Nortel assets through a Canadian ownership solution that would serve the dual purpose of keeping key wireless technologies in Canada and extending RIM’s leadership in the research, development and distribution of leading edge wireless solutions, but RIM has found itself blocked at every turn.”

The big question is why RIM wants to get into the wireless equipment market, particularly the slow-dying CDMA business. More: Here’s RIM’s press release.


[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
This entry was posted in General and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • http://nortelinsider.wordpress.com/ Desk Jockey

    This is absolutely ridiculous. Another company offers to pay MORE than NSN but is essentially turned away by Nortel by its imposition of unrealistic terms and conditions. This makes no sense. If anyone didn't believe that Nortel's management wasn't seeking to destroy the company before, all doubt has been removed.

  • PM_Guy

    There is something terribly wrong when a company is restricted from biding for more then one piece of a company. How does they enhance the value for creditors? How can a judge and court Monitor and creditor committee not object to such a restriction. Not allowing RIM to be a qualified bidder is outrageous. How can they turn away a $1.1 billion bid and be willing to accept a $650M bid?There is something that sinks very badly and I think it it MZ and the BOD I smell. They fix appears to be in.

  • tryn2makealivin

    DJ, if so I wish more facts would come out sooner than later on how and who was blocking. I surely smell a rat……… Nortel once a company on over 100K is now being sold for scrap and taking what appear to be about 4K people.

    Criminals indeed…..

  • Meridian

    There must be more to this than meets the eye. Restriction from bidding on other parts of the company could not be a true condition that the courts would allow. It would be counter-productive to “maximizing” shareholder value. RIM must have wanted some additional condition that could not be tied to the current stalking horse bid conditions. Hopeful someone else here has more insight.

    Balsillie can still buy Enterprise if he wants. We have a hockey arena here in Belleville he can drop his NHL team into as well.

  • NortelTragedy

    Is it possible that NSN is being “awarded” an auction win? Nortel should have absolutely no voice in what entities are allowed to bid for its assets. Hasn't the BoD and Mike “Zudas” Zafirovski and his crew done enough to ruin Nortel? They have no right – or shouldn't have – to dictate who can bid, or not. It wouldn't at all surprise me if there's a sweetheart under-the-table deal directing the “win” to NSN, allowing for the SLT and execs, like Richard Lowe, to get a new or “transition” gig at NSN. This is not right – as are most things with Nortel these days – and I hope that it's investigated and exposed.

  • ChaiTea

    http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssTechMediaTel…

    Looks like RIM wanted the Intellectual Property assets in addition to CDMA/LTE assets. The IP assets would have helped them in the upcoming LTE terminal pricing since their outflow due to royalty payments would be proportionally less.

    Its interesting to know that RIM execs have the confidence that they could take on the CDMA/LTE wireless infrastructure business and successfuly compete against the likes of Ericsson, NSN, ALU etc. Would this be practical though? Chances are perhaps 50/50, and in any case they cant screw up more than Mike Z and his stupid execs & BOD.

  • ChaiTea

    Looks like RIM wanted the Intellectual Property assets in addition to CDMA/LTE assets. The IP assets would have helped them in the upcoming LTE terminal pricing since their outflow due to royalty payments would be proportionally less.

    Its interesting to know that RIM execs have the confidence that they could take on the CDMA/LTE wireless infrastructure business and successfuly compete against the likes of Ericsson, NSN, ALU etc. Would this be practical though? Chances are perhaps 50/50, and in any case they cant screw up more than Mike Z and his stupid execs & BOD.

  • protosphere

    Something Stinks in Denmark

    By law under bankruptcy , it is up to the creditors to determine what Nortel assets can be sold for and not Nortel. Creditors wanted to see a plan before bonuses were approved and now there is no plan.

    Why are debtors victim of court bids now than the highest one they should be entitled to by law?

    It is also ironic other that the government hand a NSN almost a third of a cool billion bucks to finance a sale yet Nortel gets to imposes restrictions on a higher bid, and a Canadian bid at that

    The Notell liars reiterated how they want to maintain value as often as they reiterated 3 to 5 year turnaround, do they ever tell the truth? What value for less?

    They now even say they are being transparent to their stalking horse prospects like this is something out of the ordinary or privileged than an outright expectation in good faith. They are funny clowns.

    Where is the carrot or fear as fraud trials loom and many are still there to avoid more. Ironically trade options gambkle for cash again, voted to keep fraud bonuses years ago before followijng revisions. They even increasing lawsuit insurance recently who's premiums get paid first, before creditors, like their lawyers fees. They were even forced to attend a government hot seat inquiry on how they could cut severances while paying bonuses. It is so endless. it sure seems like everything they do is underhanded or a lie.

    They have close relationships with big business fiance and rewarded themselves for printing billions in Nortel paper, close relationships with regulating authorities and people in government. Even an ex finance minister is a board member and who's law firm defends Dunn. and for EDC to finance $300M with a company that is not Canadian while government's hands are tied to taking a lower bid..confusing. ….it stinks

    RIM also got fined many millions for backdating options and Nortel nothing for the largest fraud in Canada. Why is RIM is suppressed by OSC and Nortel can do what ever it wants?

    There must be a reason for them to favor the lower bid, and why isn't this reason at least transparent.

    something stinks in Denmark alright, too obvious and too endless… Nortel always did disappoint.

  • Another_Nortel_Watcher

    Now this is a subject that would make it worth reading a Zmail… which is why we will not see one.

  • A_Peon

    how long can these guys continue this without any threat over their head.

  • FraudEqualsJAIL

    Obviously the greed conspiracy that has been going on for ten long years includes people outside Nortel…

  • AnotherSlave

    This is insane. I'd sure like to see an explanation for it, if there is one.

  • dy16

    Don't forget that the creditors have to approve the sale…which means the creditors turned down RIM as well. there might be more here…like, RIM wasn't going to take 2000+ employees, but just 500. This means there would be more people laid off, and your pool of creditors is increased. They might have figured that it cost less money to take a lower bid if they take more “assets” like employees.

  • tiredofitall

    We'd have to add about 15000 more seats to that arena.

  • ChaiTea

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/ri…

    >>>>Nortel issued a statement late last night saying it is disappointed RIM decided to issue a press release regarding the auction. It pointed out that on June 30, the courts established bidding procedures, and “RIM did not object to the approval of these procedures.”

    Interesting, looks like the weird clause not allowing a company to bid on other assets for one year is in the court approved bidding procedures!!!!

  • zeroman

    way to go RIM

  • NTInfidel

    Now that the cats out of the bag. I had seen two parties on campus during the last few months doing their Due Diligence. But I wasn't going reveal RIMs interest as it was a secret, but we were wondering what happened to RIM.

    I guess now we know.

    We will probably never get the whole story on this one.

    What does this do to MPs attempt to acquire all of Nortel if there is a clause that you can't bid on another piece if you buy wireless?

    Why would the creditors agree to such a clause?

  • RedFlag

    “RIM said in its statement it sought to be considered as a qualified bidder in Nortel's auction for the wireless business, but was told it could be qualified only if it pledged not to submit offers for other Nortel assets for a year.”

    The court or the CDN gov't must re-assess the rules for the sale of Nortel divisions if it is true that Nortel blocked a higher bid.

    It just doesn't not make any sense for a higher bid to be rejected!!! CHANGE THE RULES if the rules are bad then!!!

    It seems like the is a co-ordinated effort to steal assets from Nortel by selling it very cheap.

  • zeroman

    ME,

    an article on corporate thievery please. this is bloody ridiculous. why would there be rules on what to buy and not to buy. if a party is willing to bid higher for more assets what is the problem.

    there is definitely something wrong. it stinks a lot, even more because it is under the court monitor and court supervision.

    THIS SHOULD TRIGGER AN RCMP INVESTIGATION.
    ——————————————————————————
    =======================================

  • zeroman

    there have been others looking at small portions. they were all turned away.

  • zeroman

    they are also paying 50% more than NSN. so even with your argument, the creitor pool would still be taken care off.

    as a creditor would you see 650 million or 1.1 billion. if you cared about 1.1 billion then would you not question the court monitor.

  • RedFlag

    A little too late I'm afraid, they are pushing this thru.

    What makes this more sickening is that there is a high ranking politician on the BOD, MR MANLEY.

    You gotta wonder if manley is a Canadian in name only!

  • fre

    As said above, it is because NSN bid does not include IP property, only CDMA and LTE assets. The IP alone is valued at higher that 1.1 billion altogether. So RIM was also making an offer on the cheap. The actual Nortel employees will be better off with NSN…

  • ChaiTea

    I suspect 1.1B is RIMs upper threshold of their bid, and that NSN/MP imminent bidding war would top that.

  • GoProto

    “Interesting, looks like the weird clause not allowing a company to bid on other assets for one year is in the court approved bidding procedures!!!!”
    —————————————————————————————————
    re
    And if it is, you can't blame anyone now. Why would the court approve this?

  • GoProto

    Did you expect any different? It is an interesting turn of events.. but I for one, am not in the least bit surprised. It would be a shocker if they proceeded with any normalcy, dignity, or morality at all at this point. I bet there is more, way more, to come.

  • GoProto

    Did you expect any different? It is an interesting turn of events.. but I for one, am not in the least bit surprised. It would be a shocker if they proceeded with any normalcy, dignity, or morality at all at this point. I bet there is more, way more, to come.

  • zeroman

    one question. why can the pension fund not be used to raise money and buyout nortel or units? would that not help pensioners have some probability of seeing their money.

    or is this too much common sense.

  • zeroman

    he should change his name. he does not even have the balls to stand up for Canada. he is just the same. out for himself.

  • PM_Guy

    I disagree, RIM has not actually made any bids. The bid process has not begun yet. They have been denied the opportunity to be a qualified bidder for CMDA/LTE because they want to bid on IP property and would be denied if they bid on this sale.

    It is likely NSN lawyers through in this term on the staking horse to protect there bid. Likely no one actually caught this limitation in the terms before the bidding terms were approved by the courts.

    No that they are approved they will not change unless the gov't steps in to block the sale and this is not likely going to happen.

  • zeroman

    I hope, wish and pray that a bidding war starts. if it must end in foreign hands then let them pay big for it. NSN can fork up 1.1 billion for the unit. or let another canadian firm “fin-ish” them a pun on fins from finland.

  • RedFlag

    The only way to steal assets legally is to do just what NT's management is doing. Get the court to put crazy conditions on any sale of assets.

    Do you really think the foreign ownership will have a priority to keep jobs in Canada or to save pensions. They will say the do do appeas the sheeple but I'm afarid money talks louder than words.

  • tiredofitall

    We'd have to add about 15000 more seats to that arena.

  • ChaiTea

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/ri…

    >>>>Nortel issued a statement late last night saying it is disappointed RIM decided to issue a press release regarding the auction. It pointed out that on June 30, the courts established bidding procedures, and “RIM did not object to the approval of these procedures.”

    Interesting, looks like the weird clause not allowing a company to bid on other assets for one year is in the court approved bidding procedures!!!!

  • zeroman

    way to go RIM. sounds like the bids are rigged.

  • Guest

    Now that the cats out of the bag. I had seen two parties on campus during the last few months doing their Due Diligence. But I wasn't going reveal RIMs interest as it was a secret, but we were wondering what happened to RIM.

    I guess now we know.

    We will probably never get the whole story on this one.

    What does this do to MPs attempt to acquire all of Nortel if there is a clause that you can't bid on another piece if you buy wireless?

    Why would the creditors agree to such a clause?

  • RedFlag

    “RIM said in its statement it sought to be considered as a qualified bidder in Nortel's auction for the wireless business, but was told it could be qualified only if it pledged not to submit offers for other Nortel assets for a year.”

    The court or the CDN gov't must re-assess the rules for the sale of Nortel divisions if it is true that Nortel blocked a higher bid.

    It just doesn't not make any sense for a higher bid to be rejected!!! CHANGE THE RULES if the rules are bad then!!!

    It seems like the is a co-ordinated effort to steal assets from Nortel by selling it very cheap.

  • zeroman

    ME,

    an article on corporate thievery please. this is bloody ridiculous. why would there be rules on what to buy and not to buy. if a party is willing to bid higher for more assets what is the problem.

    there is definitely something wrong. it stinks a lot, even more because it is under the court monitor and court supervision.

    if nortel is choosing bidders on the basis of exec jobs, salaries, transition then the process is flawed. and I think this under the table corrupt dealing is definitely going on.

    THIS SHOULD TRIGGER AN RCMP INVESTIGATION.
    ——————————————————————————
    =======================================

  • zeroman

    there have been others looking at small portions. they were all turned away.

  • zeroman

    they are also paying 50% more than NSN. so even with your argument, the creitor pool would still be taken care off.

    as a creditor would you see 650 million or 1.1 billion. if you cared about 1.1 billion then would you not question the court monitor.

  • RedFlag

    A little too late I'm afraid, they are pushing this thru.

    What makes this more sickening is that there is a high ranking politician on the BOD, MR MANLEY.

    You gotta wonder if manley is a Canadian in name only!

  • fre

    As said above, it is because NSN bid does not include IP property, only CDMA and LTE assets. The IP alone is valued at higher that 1.1 billion altogether. So RIM was also making an offer on the cheap. The actual Nortel employees will be better off with NSN…

  • ChaiTea

    I suspect 1.1B is RIMs upper threshold of their bid, and that NSN/MP imminent bidding war would top that.

  • GoProto

    “Interesting, looks like the weird clause not allowing a company to bid on other assets for one year is in the court approved bidding procedures!!!!”
    —————————————————————————————————
    re
    And if it is, you can't blame anyone now. Why would the court approve this?

  • GoProto

    Deleted: double post

  • GoProto

    Did you expect any different? It is an interesting turn of events.. but I for one, am not in the least bit surprised. It would be a shocker if they proceeded with any normalcy, dignity, or morality at all at this point. I bet there is more, way more, to come.

  • zeroman

    one question. why can the pension fund not be used to raise money and buyout nortel or units? would that not help pensioners have some probability of seeing their money.

    or is this too much common sense.

  • zeroman

    he should change his name. he does not even have the balls to stand up for Canada. he is just the same. out for himself.

  • PM_Guy

    I disagree, RIM has not actually made any bids. The bid process has not begun yet. They have been denied the opportunity to be a qualified bidder for CMDA/LTE because they want to bid on IP property and would be denied if they bid on this sale.

    It is likely NSN lawyers through in this term on the staking horse to protect there bid. Likely no one actually caught this limitation in the terms before the bidding terms were approved by the courts.

    No that they are approved they will not change unless the gov't steps in to block the sale and this is not likely going to happen.

  • zeroman

    I hope, wish and pray that a bidding war starts. if it must end in foreign hands then let them pay big for it. NSN can fork up 1.1 billion for the unit. or let another canadian firm “fin-ish” them a pun on fins from finland.

  • TwitterCounter for @markevans
  • Seeking Alpha Certified