Matlin Patterson Creates Advisory Board for Nortel Bid

According to the Financial Times, Matlin Patterson is assembling a team of “telecommunications industry veterans” to advise them on how to put together its bid for Nortel.

In addition to Dion Joannou, who used to be president of Nortel’s North American operations, the FT said Matlin Patterson has recruited:
- Richard Burns, the ex-president of AT&T’s wireless network;
- Richard Piasentin, former group vice president of sales for Nortel;
- Tony Pirih, former head of Nortel’s R&D operations, and
- Chris Smith, former executive vice president in charge of Alltel’s network operations.


[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
This entry was posted in General and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • NortelTragedy

    Dion, Piasentin? Why not just invite back Dunn and Roth to join in on the fun?

  • unknownPath

    6 days and counting…..

  • yes4aapl

    The selection of Dion Joannou and other senior industry veterans as advisors is also designed to underscore MatlinPatterson’s longer term intentions for the Nortel business.

    According to people close to the discussions, the team also includes Richard Burns, the former president of AT&T’s wireless network; Richard Piasentin, a former group vice president of sales for Nortel; Tony Pirih, former head of Nortel’s R&D operations, and Chris Smith, former executive vice president in charge of Alltel’s network operations.
    —-
    re
    at that moment it looks like MP wants to have own team of managers for new Nortel.
    and more of MP
    In contrast, MatlinPatterson argues that a counter offer for the whole of the business, while not precluding divestitures “down the line,” could potentially save many more jobs than the estimated 3,100 that would be taken on by Nokia Siemens under its proposal.

  • joremero

    These guys are serious… I think. They better prepare lots of coffee cuz the next days are going to be long.

  • sick_sigma

    What is this? It looks like Matlin Patterson is assembling a team with actual telecom experience? Gosh, what an AMAZING concept. Too bad mike zeroman didn't think of that.

  • scalppeeler

    WTF is going on .
    Here it is July 15th.
    All these bulletins coming out 6 days before the deadline.
    I think its all nimbus.

  • sick_sigma

    Just in case anyone is wondering, here are the key dates for the stalking horse process to come to an end

    http://www.crn.com/networking/218401355;jsessio…

    July 21 Tuesday – deadline for bids to be submitted
    July 24 Friday – bid opening/auction at Nortel's office in New York
    July 28 Tuesday – court hearing to review the auction results

  • NTblinker

    i can't imagine how much these guys talked with MP for this advisory commitee of MatlinPatterson. Million Million $$$.

  • scalppeeler

    Can't.
    Dunn is at John Manleys Cottage and Roth is doing a hermann munster remake movie.

  • ChaiTea

    MP would need really deep pockets to win. The amount of cash they would have to spend on CDMA/LTE in their fight with NSN would be significant. Perhaps 1.5B for CDMA/LTE alone? Then they would have to compete with the other bidders for the remaining parts (MEN, CVAS etc). Wow this is one interesting soap opera. Unfortunately, most of us cannot enjoy the show since we are the ones potentially getting screwed.

  • felixmk

    Tony Pirih head of R&D?? Richard Piasentin group head of sales. I smell title inflation…

  • felixmk

    Gollogly and Beatty are available.

  • ntpurgatory

    For the life of me I cannot remember what Tony Pirih did for Nortel in his 6-9 mo stint here. I remember Lowe introducing him, then this post. An exMoto guy…

  • yes4aapl

    MP would need really deep pockets to win. The amount of cash they would have to spend on CDMA/LTE in their fight with NSN would be significant. Perhaps 1.5B for CDMA/LTE alone? Then they would have to compete with the other bidders for the remaining parts (MEN, CVAS etc). Wow this is one interesting soap opera. Unfortunately, most of us cannot enjoy the show since we are the ones potentially getting screwed.
    =====
    re
    There is something wrong in all of that crap.
    Mike Z and BoD ignoring what creditors say is just wrong and I would guess is illegal and criminal.
    It pushes creditors to bid for Nortel to pay back creditors…. not much sense…is it?
    OK let's say creditors bid another $4.2 bill and take Nortel private…
    They get money back, they get Nortel's cash and they will still be under ch11 protection to do restructuring… and all that nonsense because Mike Z does not know when to quit….

  • yes4aapl

    Let me make some conclusions from all the discussions we had on this blog about Ch11, Mike Z and BoD.
    I understand that Mike Z and BoD used Ch11 BK protection laws just to make restructuring Plan with the emerging from CH11 as an outcome.
    Today is July 15, it’s been 7 months since Nortel announced Ch11
    After the NSN bid of $650 mill Mike Z stated that he will sell all BU one by one, did he not? Nobody expects him to show restructuring Plan. Am I right?
    And that is the point he should resign right away.
    That unclear legal mambo jumbo causes senseless actions of the real owners of Nortel and that is creditors.
    Let me show the main creditors right now.
    $4.2 B debt plus $3 bill Pension Plan deficit…
    Rebellion of Mike Z CEO and BoD against creditors is unprecedented and illegal imho.
    Creditors said that selling Nortel in pieces is not the best option for them, did they not?
    Ok, they will easily prove who the real owner is, Mike Z and BOD or them, with $7.2 bill if they agree to support MP.
    Mike Z and BOD denied shareholders rights before and that’s why they did not have their say in all of that. too bad…
    But now
    The main creditors can bid as much as $7.2 bill to just prove they are the legal entity to decide about Nortel.
    Even if some of you think it would require $7.2 bill in cash to put on the table /I don’t think it is necessary/
    And here we are
    If anyone wants to take over Nortel bid more than creditors or stay silent forever.

    In other words, let creditors do what they think is right for Nortel.
    As I know MP wants to restructure Nortel.
    yes4aapl2007@yahoo.com

  • GoProto

    i conclude (concluded long ago) that Mike Z and BoD never had any intention of declaring a restructuring plan.. it was all a dangling carrot to hang out while they let time go by to hand out bonuses and drain more money from the coffers of Nortel and keep the slow but deliberate bleed going to source their blood money .Nothing more than that. if you know otherwise, anyone.. show proof right now.

  • protosphere

    First it was to be a great company again, printed billions in paper and boasted 3 to 5 plan turnaround that led to downplayed insolvency after buying opportunities, etc…

    Rather than emerge from bankruptcy more focused they sold the farm the day after the forced government inquisition into bonuses without severances

    Today bagholders like EDC /Mat/Pat. try to bail sunken ship when everyone knows it won't float anymore. Why?

    Too many insiders have their nose into the old cash cow now gone out to pasture thinking there is any value left, anything, the party was too great running the show to admit to any hangover… not realizing it is over with 400B in market cap gone, and the remaining units are fried, worth less by the day, they spent almost as much on PEC as they are selling the farm, and even that is declining.

    No value but an overwhelming interest in maintaining value after burning so many. Investors, creditors, employees, taxpayer, markets, etc., all got burned… ad today who knows what goes on when a BOD member can defend Dunn and old insiders want to to a bid

    Looking for any value where there is none. Management leached $400M to bring it to this state, I guess the lure of leaching more is overwhelming by too many.

    Lets see if they can create yet another paper elephant for all the interest. In light of this, what don't we know, I don't trust any of it. Insiders, bagholders, anything associated with this contradicting money burner, as that is what it truly does best, burns money.

  • protosphere

    too many insiders again… something stinks in Denmark…again

  • protosphere

    “potentially save many more jobs”

    potentially is right but for how long at best, worse part is the motive, they are bagholders

  • Theleftbehind

    CALA on Chap 11 now. That means CALA's Sunrise employees don't get a package if fired.

  • Another_Nortel_Watcher

    No kidding. Richard P is an ops guy. Tony P is a Moto guy hired by Lowe who knows nothing about Nortel. It doesn't get any worse than that. This is what happens when viruses spread from one host to another.

    So far, the terminal vacuum of vision and insight remains.

  • yes4aapl

    ·
    “I know this has been a tough few weeks for all of us….The path forward is filled with challenges and the work ahead for us for the balance of 2008 and beyond is significant. I am committed and determined to see this through and put Nortel on the right path.”
    “To ensure a better future, we need a new structure and become lean, responsive and affordable to move the company forward. Bottom line, we are in a tough environment. The very toughest I have seen in my business career.”
    “The most important job we all face right now is delivering on the fourth quarter and meeting the guidance we gave on September 17. We must move forward as aggressively as we can in this environment. We cannot afford to slow down at all. In fact, we must drive up our efforts and results.”
    Mike Z, shameless CEO

  • yes4aapl

    Proto
    I say it's been criminal negligence at best what BoD and Mike has been doing.
    They lost their mandate to lead Nortel the day they delisted NT stock.
    They have always ignored shareholders, as long as I remember.
    Who they represent now?
    The next in line to be legal entity deciding Nortel's future are creditors.
    The day BoD and Mike admitted failure in presenting restructuring Plan was the day for them to resign and let creditors do their job_Plans.
    They lied to Judge who decided that creditors have to bid for what's legally theirs. NSN deal smells from the distance.
    $650 mill would be nice before BK, it means included the debt and liabilities related to that unit, means some money for shareholders as well.
    No wander creditors are pissed off for such crooked game Mike Z and BoD plays with them.
    I would expect new charges against BoD and Nortel's managers for not doing their fiduciary duties to represent the best interest of the stakeholders.
    What about OttawaCitizen
    By Bert Hill, The Ottawa CitizenJune 24, 2009

    With the move to sell off all its operating divisions, Nortel Networks faces a tough decision.
    If, as now appears highly likely, Nortel fails to emerge from bankruptcy protection, can it still pay full retention and incentive bonuses to 972 key executives and product development and sales staff?
    ….
    Question: “Is Nortel emerging from bankruptcy?
    Answer: “Nortel is focused on finding the right buyers for its businesses. If we are successful in selling our businesses Nortel will not continue as a going concern and will not emerge.”
    http://www.ottawacitizen.com/Business/Critics+q…

  • ChaiTea

    Mp will not get the Nortels USD 2.7B cash. Since MP wont assume the current liabilities, the existing USD2.7B cash + what ever is the sum total of winning bids will go to the secured+unsecured debtors.

    Therefore, even if MP bids $4.2 bill, they would need atleast another $2B capital injection to keep the engines running once they take over. Thats a huge amount of capital to be raised.

    Not worth taking the risk on Nortel in my opinion.

  • ChaiTea

    >Rebellion of Mike Z CEO and BoD against creditors is unprecedented and illegal imho
    Dont agree with you on the illegal part. The rationale being that it was the Delaware court which heard both sides of the argument and then made the decision to allow selling off the parts.

  • Pauljam

    A creditor owed 10% of the debt wants to control 100% of the debt … if I were another creditor I'd be a tad wary.

    Oops, I forgot I am a creditor, in which case … no thank you !

  • ChaiTea

    >can it still pay full retention and incentive bonuses to 972 key executives and product development and sales staff
    I suspect 'Yes' since it was a separate pot approved explicitely by the bankruptcy court.

  • yes4aapl

    and look if “all main creditors are united” in the opinion that restructuring under MP leadership is better than firesale they will have to bid for Nortel which is legally theirs.
    In other words
    United creditors are legal owners of Nortel.
    It will be enough to show unity in front of the judge and Mike Z and BoD will have to go!
    update
    By Euan Rocha

    TORONTO, July 15 (Reuters) – MatlinPatterson is open to working with strategic partners in putting forward a comprehensive proposal to reorganize the businesses of bankrupt Canadian telecom equipment maker Nortel Networks (NRTLQ.PK), the U.S. private equity firm said on Wednesday.

    MatlinPatterson, a major bondholder and Nortel creditor, has stated that it does not believe that the proposed sale of Nortel's key wireless technology unit to Nokia Siemens Networks [NSN.UL] maximizes value for Nortel stakeholders.

    “We welcome the opportunity to work with potential strategic partners to leverage Nortel's resources and leading LTE technology long into the future,” said MatlinPatterson in a statement.

  • ChaiTea

    Another example of milking the system: the CDMA VP Noy Kucuk has been living as an expat in France for quiet a while (significantly more remuneration as an expat), even though he does not have one frigging CDMA team member or customer in France!!!! Now that he is forced to move back from France, he is going to Calgary, instead of Ottawa or Richardson where the CDMA teams exist!!!

    All this while the peons are told to cut costs, garbage is being collected only once a week in Ottawa, coffee stations are closed, cafeterias are being closed!!!!

  • ConnorMcLeod

    Hopefully not – if we want to have a chance for a new start.

    If this will happen we can stay with the GE Gang and wait till the final end.
    They're doing anyhow a good job to ruin the company.

  • protosphere

    “NSN deal smells from the distance.”

    sure,
    ex-Nortel people /insiders
    bagholder support (EDC in this case. even large creditor Mat-Pat wants more to raise bid, ex managers want more for pensions, everyone wants more when well runs dry to maintain white elephant)

    seems they still have an extended family of those they hold close relationships in high places / finance, government, legal circles, as BOD member's law firm defends Dunn

    they scrap restructuring to sell the farm immediately after government inquiry they were forced to attend by subpoena to answer why they pay millions in bonuses while cutting severances

    hot seat smirks focused on maintaining value… after 3 to 5 years from great to bust, buying opportunity hiding behind kids investment with bells on for sympathy,

    if listing tax credits as largest asset is only tangible grounds for lawsuit, our laws need attention

    NSN deal stinks. Mat-Pat potential bid stinks, anything Nortel does stinks. I agree.

  • GoProto

    Yep, that shows proof alright. Proof that his comments as you have noted, were nothing but a smoke screen to keep the dough rolling.. into their pockets.

  • vvvv

    Piasentin did wireless sales in EMEA for a long time.

  • NortelTragedy

    RP's last gig was “market pricing” — making sure bids were competitive, MSRP at market price, a BS role if there ever was one. Didn't impress me at all.

  • Wapuka1

    It looks like MP is trying to recruit clowns for the Cirque du Soleil. Joannou, Piasentin, and Pirih's only skills were (1) their ability to collect pay checks; and (2) their ability to become invisible and avoid productivity. If these clowns were ever allowed to run a company, their incompetence would rival MIke Z's team of GEniuses.

    It is obvious that MP is looking to force Nokia to pay more for the CDMA / LTE assets and get a better pay back for their bond holdings. None of this pay out will filter down to ex-employees owed severance or pensioners.

    The bottomline is that MP does not have the capital to make a serious bid for Nortel's assets and no private equity firm or bank is willing to lend them a single Looney. Hence, MP's statement that they are willing to partner.

  • Another_Nortel_Watcher

    I could be mistaken, but I don't think that role in EMEA was at executive level and certainly not as “Group Vice President”.

  • zeroman

    MP wont be able to pull this off. It can buy out nortel and break it up in pieces making millions. it will not be in the business of turning the company around. more uncertainity, more erosion of customers. more dwindling of revenues.

    eve nif MP raises the bid, NSN has already said it will raise its bid. dont see MP winning this.

  • yes4aapl

    for the first time I have to disagree with your opinion.
    MP knows how to do it.
    You just underestimate MP

  • NTInfidel

    Do you work for MP? Because you seem to do nothing but support MP and as far as I can tell you are the only one.

    No one can hold Nortel together. Nortel is done. Selling the assets to actual telecom companies is absolutely the best thing can happen for employees.

    The first such potential sale is with NSN and this will be a big win for those employees, they will get offer letters and be full employees again, out from under bankruptcy and with the full rights of employee again.

    If MP wins, the dark clouds continue.

  • NTInfidel

    I think MP has what it wants. It has NSN admitting they will bid more. So MP will enter a bid to drive up the price but they don't actually want to win.

    I can't even see how MP can make money by winning a bid here. This is not how MP normally makes money. Normally they buy enough junk bonds at pennies on the dollar to assume control or at least block and assert their will in court. They didn't get nearly enough this time.

    So now if they want control they have to bid full price against everyone else. How can they bid more than anyone else wants to pay and then turn around and sell it for more later. As you correctly point out, MP winning is more uncertainty, more customer erosion, more dwindling of revenues. Essentially a dwindling value of the asset and a lower sale price in the future.

    I would almost like to see NSN call their bluff. When MP outbids them, NSN can say, take it. Collect their 23 million and leave MP on the hook for near a billion bucks just for wireless (700 million purchase and > 250 Million in employee salaries).

  • NTblinker

    agree.

  • yes4aapl

    Selling the assets to actual telecom companies is absolutely the best thing can happen for employees.
    =====
    re
    Look at you.
    You don't understand the process.
    You don't know whose interest is on top. That is a big problem with Nortel and always has been. You did not understand that shareholders were real owners before, that creditors are legal owners now as we speak. By destroying shareholders you destroyed Nortel. You should know that much. If creditors say Mike Z and current BoD do not choose the best options for them, it means exactly that.
    It means Mike Z and BoD try to do things against creditors interest and that in turn is illegal.
    As well it was illegal to use Ch11 and not have restructuring Plan.

    Creditors just wanted to make selling assets if any more fair.

  • The psychiatrist

    No one can hold Nortel together. Nortel is done. Selling the assets to actual telecom companies is absolutely the best thing that can happen for employees.

    T

  • NTInfidel

    Is there supposed to something intelligible in that uninformed, clueless ramble, because if there was it is indecipherable.

    It is not illegal to enter CH11 without a restructuring plan. A hefty amount of companies never do restructure and emerge. At some point you have to face the reality that the business is no longer viable, then the best interest of all parties is to sell the units while the still have some value.

    Some creditors are not happy, this is normal in a bankruptcy, but if the majority are not happy they can block the sale. This does not appear to be happening.

    Mainly we just have MP saber rattling.

  • NTInfidel

    The thing is yes4apples, paints it like MP would be good for employees. That clearly makes no sense. I also responded to zeroman why I believe they would also fail at extracting more value by purchasing everything. Something which I think they will eventually realize and back down from.

    As far as creditors go(other than MP), it doesn't matter who buys what pieces or what they do with them after, they get their money and it is over, so for a creditor this discussion is largely moot. Auction, highest bidder, done. Not much to argue there.

    So a more important discussion is what these buyers mean for the employees(presumable more employees here than creditors) that have born the brunt of punishment through all of this.

    Without a doubt being sold to a working Telecom, becoming real employees with rights again, and having stability, is better than a vulture like MP acquiring all or the part of Nortel you work for and continuing the uncertainty, decline.

  • Wapuka1

    MP's goal is to maximize its return on its inital bond purchases. We are in violent agreement as to MP being a competent company. We just disagree on their end goal. T

  • zeroman

    maybe this will scare off others. I think it will have that effect. nobody wants to get in a bidding war. but if it just wants to increase price, all it has to do is offer $750M for CDMA/LTE and watch Nokia's move.

    Nokia would then beat it right. Wrong! I agree they will just let MP take the business and kill it buying it for half that 6 months down the road.

    I would think everyone is waiting for Q2 results and they are going to be a bombshell. meaning more uncertainity + lower bids.

    MP has no understanding of the Nortel business. The group of people they got to consult are not even qualified let alone know what is going on at Nortel internally.

    So maybe good for Nortel and MP but bad for creditors.

    What the hell does Nortel want. Its been 6 months for all units on the chopping block. Only one public bid so far. Its losing value with every passing day.

  • zeroman

    there is nothing that can be done to save nortel. even if it were bought in whole, it has to be broken up to sell off pieces that do not add value.

    the company historically only does 10 billion. cost structure is too high. no profit. it cannot survive. decisions should have been made 3 years ago but now its too late.

    noone can do anything about all the debt it has accumalated.

  • yes4aapl

    Wapuka1
    Creditors are a bit surprised by Mike Z and BoD 's move=rebellion.
    They supposed to work in the best interest of creditors, make restructuring Plan, get creditors' acceptance and do the restructuring under Ch11. That's what it all was about, wasn't it?
    That's why courts gave Nortel more time to draw the Plan.
    and June 19 statement that Nortel entered into agreement with NSN and will sell all units one by one without Plan and without emerging from BK. That was surprise to all and stupid act in face of potential customers and other stakeholders.
    There was not much time left for MatPat but look, they've got many ex managers_insiders and are serious in their fight to squeeze much more than Mike Z would do by fireselling.
    Getting hot!
    btw
    NSN, Sue contradicted herself few times already. Who would believe NSN anyway?
    Oh, they have support of that guy, NTinfidel. He was ready to disclose important info for the bidding process. example who was on the campus, how the DD was done… and more.
    Who knows how much he knows, but it's not the reason to share such info publicly. I would suspect that he can be the one who signed his name too on that initial NSN deal at funny price…otherwise why would he deny freemarket open_fair bidding process?

  • vvvv

    He was an ELT member but definitely not a GVP.

  • TwitterCounter for @markevans
  • Seeking Alpha Certified