Confidential: Nortel’s Key Messages and Q&A for Customers

Here’s a confidential document that Nortel created to address its key messages as well as Q&A for customers in the wake of the proposed sale of its CDMA business and LTE R&D unit to Nokia Siemens.

One of the more interesting tidbits is the name “Nortel” could be sold as part of a transaction.

Key Messages:

“After careful review – decision taken to find buyers for each of our businesses – best way to carry Nortel’s rich innovation platforms into the future.”

Best path for Nortel to maximize value while preserving innovation and jobs to the greatest extent possible; Provides clarity for our customers and employees and maximizes value for our creditors

“Taken decisive action to move forward with a plan to sell substantially all of our CDMA business and LTE Access assets.”

Entered into a Stalking Horse Sale Agreement for the sale of substantially all CDMA Business and LTE Access Assets with Nokia Siemens Networks for US$650 million; Demonstrates the strength and value of Nortel’s wirelss assets throughout the industry; Seeking a strong and stable buyer is the best path forward for our CDMA business and LTE Access assets.

If successfully completed, this transaction would:

- Give our customers a clear roadmap for the future evolution of their networks

- Preserve employement to the greatest extent possible

- At least 2,500 employees would have the opportunity to continue with Nokia Siemens Networks.

This represents the majority of the employees associated with the assets being sold.
“Process well under way – Company is advancing in its discussions with external parties to sell its other businesses.”

Focused on finding the right buyers for our businesses; Will assess other restructuring alternatives for these businesses in the event it is unable to maximize value through sales; Will apply to delist its common shares and the NNL preferred shares from trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange

No change in our near term focus: Customer contracts remain in place during this process and we will continue to communicate with you throughout this process

- Nothing changes until the stalking horse process is complete

- We will be speaking with customers 1:1 to help them understand the process, and the scope of the proposed sale

Important to understand that this transaction is not final and is subject to a bidding process. This agreement has no immediate impact on Nortel’s current customer contracts. We will remain focused on our customers throughout this process and continue to be responsive and maintain open communication.

Q&A

Is Nortel headed for a break-up?

After completing a careful analysis, it has become clear that the optimal path for each of our businesses is to find buyers who can carry Nortel’s rich innovation platforms into the future.
The company is advancing in its discussions with external parties to sell its other businesses – this will provide an opportunity to maximize value while preserving innovation and jobs to the greatest extent possible

Is Nortel emerging from bankruptcy?
Nortel is focused on finding the right buyers for its businesses. If we are successful in selling our businesses Nortel will not continue as a going concern and will not emerge.

Does this mean Nortel is being liquidated?
No. We are focused for finding the right buyers for all of our businesses. After completing a careful analysis of each of our businesses, it has become clear that the best outcome for each of our businesses is to find buyers who can carry Nortel’s rich innovation platforms into the future. The company will assess other restructuring alternatives for these businesses in the event it is unable to maximize value through a sale.

What will happen to the Nortel name?
If we are successful in selling all our businesses, the Nortel name may continue with one of those businesses, depending on the terms of the deal.

What happened – what got you to this point?

After completing a careful analysis, it has become clear that the optimal path for each of our businesses is to find buyers who can carry Nortel’s rich innovation platforms into the future. We believe this is the best path for our businesses and our customers

What is a “stalking horse”?
In the U.S., this sale requires a court-approved bidding process, known as a “stalking horse” or 363 Sale under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code. In addition, consummation of the stalking horse transaction is subject to higher or otherwise better offers, approval of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware and the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, and the satisfaction of other customary and other conditions.

We expect the U.S. stalking horse process to continue for a period of 39 days once bidding procedures are approved. Thereafter additional time may be required to satisfy all other conditions and obtain other necessary court or government approvals. We will update you on the status of the process as further information is available.

WIRELESS:

Will Richard Lowe (or any other executive) have a position at NSN? What will that be?
We are at the start of a bidding process and we are unable to comment on these details until the 363 sale process is complete.

What is the benefit for NSN in purchasing Nortel’s LTE/CDMA assets?

If the sale is successfully concluded, it would provide NSN with technology, know-how, and embedded resources to support a significant new customer base in NA and abroad. NSN would also gain a team of the most capable employees in our industry. If the sale is successfully concluded, Nortel’s LTE innovation could enable NSN to enter 4G market trials in 2009. We have already made significant advancement in 4G, and have seen significant market success. Nortel is involved in LTE trials with operators around the world.

Earlier this year, Nortel showcased the power of LTE at Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, Spain in February. We worked with industry partners like LG Electronics to demonstrate LTE’s ability to offer high speed mobile broadband on live air networks and across various spectrums. We also supported T-Mobile’s LTE showcase in Bonn, Germany and displayed those mobile capabilities in Barcelona.

Why didn’t you consolidate three years ago when the rest of the industry was consolidating (Alcatel-Lucent, Nokia-Siemens, etc.)?
We reviewed numerous M&A scenarios over the past several years, but none of these made sense/were in the best interests of Nortel at the time.

Technorati Tags: , ,

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
This entry was posted in Executive Suite and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • protosphere

    Ericsson is not only in with Verizon and CDMA now but

    http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/embargoed-v…
    Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson win Verizon LTE deal
    February 18, 2009 — 2:45am

    “Ericsson and Alcatel-Lucent scored deals to be the primary infrastructure vendors for the radio access network. In addition, Alcatel-Lucent and Nokia Siemens will be the key suppliers for the IMS network”

  • lastCDMAchump

    The problem here is the LTE cost structure. Nortel's LTE solution (even if technically superior) won't be competitive. To give you an example of the Nortel's cost structure in the similar technology; cost of a WiMax modem (designed by the same Ottawa team) was in a range of 9k. At the same time you could buy one, in an open market, for less than 2k. The cost of Nortel’s WiMax was one of the reason's Nortel was trying to go into partnership with the Israelis.

  • less

    … outsourcing to low-cost centers of excellence abroad helps. Sometimes…

  • lastCDMAchump

    You are right, it does. The CDMA support and production control was outsourced to China 9 months ago. Go and check the CDMA revenue versus customer satisfaction since then.

  • Lookahead

    Notel failed on Verizon LTE bid was'nt cost problem, it was the uncertainty by Zero man and NT BoD factor. When you talking about cost structure, you may forget the infrustructure evolution from traditional CDMA to a next generation tech like a company scale of Verizon, which is why a company like Verizon or AT&T would go for an open market products.

    For Nortel WiMax, it is entirely different story. Nortel WiMax base station is okay, but signal portion is bad design, it failed either not because the cost structure as you talked about.

  • NortelEmp

    It's on the EPIQ systems website. Lots of info (almost too much). Look at the dockets from Jun 19th.

    http://chapter11.epiqsystems.com/docket/docketl…

    I don't have any impression of NSN. I'm not an employee anymore. I don't really have an opinion on the sale itself.

  • lastCDMAchump

    Same old BNR bull***t. Cost doesn't matter, our product is few times more expensive but, it is made out of special gold coated parts that nobody else is allowed to use.
    Unfortunately due to globalization nobody believes that sh*t any longer. Even Verizon and AT&T will eventually be forced to use lower cost suppliers. Nortel's charming powers ended with its DMS line, and now you can see the effects. MEN supposedly has the best technology available, but it never made a single red cent.

  • yes4aapl

    Over the last 9 years the cost of CDMA base station was decreased from app. $150k down to $20k. These cost reductions added over $1B to Nortel's bottom line
    ===
    re
    any proof?
    Link pls…
    becouse I have links to prove you forgot to ground the towers and the lighting destroyed them!
    bsnl example..

  • Anonymous

    Thare are many Nortel hatreds in this blog, they wish every thing Nortel did is wrong, including long history of Nortel R&D advantages, they are actually in the same army as Zero man cronies to bash and to try to bring down the 114 year old company.

    I am not in the same line as those biasing ones hate Nortel guts, I just giving the facts.

  • exnt_x_2

    “The Chinese that supposed to support CDMA are as green as a lime tree, and the Ottawa LTE team has no concept of cost. “

    Oh God. Let's not even get started on the Chinese.

    I can say from a couple of conversations that whatever Nortel had, Huawei does now.

  • exnt_x_2

    Read your post again, LA. Look at your attention to details like grammar and spelling, sentence structure and phrasing. You've really managed to say a great deal about Nortel's attention to getting things right in the same way.

  • Milan_Bekich

    Next up… Enterprise. What am I bid for Enterprise ?

    Milan

    Nortel Networks will soon announce the sale of its enterprise division as it moves to break itself apart completely. Nortel said late last week it would sell its CDMA and LTE wireless businesses to Nokia Siemens Networks for $650 million.

    The enterprise unit, which makes networks and gear for large corporate clients, is the next logical candidate. After the wireless division, it is Nortel's biggest business unit. It had first-quarter revenue of $395 million, down 41 percent from a year earlier, Nortel reported last month.

    Nortel said on Friday it is making progress in selling its other businesses, but added it will “assess other restructuring alternatives” if sales don't materialize.

  • gone2moro

    Factoid. The UN is still at war with N. Korea. An Armmistice was signed by the UN and N. Korea. Not the US and N. Korea. Which is why no one really cares if little kim declares war on anyone… now if he decides to do more than take a couple cheap shots across the DMZ…. we may see hostilities resume.

  • Lookahead

    Are you shiting the topic to MEN with your funny cost structure theory? let me tell you your laughable comments about Nortel MEN is so wrong:

    Do you know who is the No.1 market share in Optical? it is Nortel MEN, not other vendors, looking into today's media with new Nortel MEN win again. Nortel MEN is 41 % market share now. No others can reach that level in near two years period.

    The lastest DELL research aynalysis report also cited the Nortel software switch ranked No. 1 leading position.

    Do you think NSN/Verizon/AT&T top level execs would be the same idotic as you are?

    I am very much doubt you really understand the teleco market today from your “never made a single red cent” as you tried to mix the Zero man damage with the NT technology advantages.

  • exnt_x_2

    “… mediocrity in many divisions at Nortel was a highly developed art form.”

    That is true. And without exaggeration.

    Well, OK, maybe take out the “highly developed.” But Nortel did bring mediocrity to a level of art I've seen nowhere else. The things I've seen people do to simply to satisfy a whim, when the consequences would be so obviously detrimental to the company …

    For some of you moving on I can tell you, it'll be striking at first what professionalism looks like at your new employers. Nortel wasn't normal. It put a gun to its head and pulled the trigger. You figure out what's normal from that.

  • lastCDMAchump

    Hey, you are barking at the wrong tree. CDMA had nothing to do with BSNL. The BSNL GSM crap was done in France by N. Kucuc, who as a result was promoted to run CDMA as well.

    As for the cost reduction details, you can't find and official links to the details. The executives (R. Lowe and the N. Kucuc gang) would be embarrassed to publish how they mismanaged the CDMA.

  • less

    North Korea declared itself a “proud nuclear power” and warned it will strike if provoked.

    “It would be a grave mistake for the U.S. to think it can remain unhurt if it ignites the fuse of war on the Korean peninsula,” the country's main Rodong Sinmun said in a commentary.

    No mention about the UN anywhere…

    This reminds me how Macedonian-born Zafirovski has periodically been blamed at AAN for ruining Nortel because, as an American, he didn't understand (the) Culture.

  • lastCDMAchump

    Well, why don't you go and check Nortel's quarterly/annual reports for past few years and see how much money Nortel sunk into MEN.
    With every win Nortel was and it is loosing money.
    Putting aside the UMTS (were Nortel sunk almost $4.5B), optical was the biggest money recipient from other divisions.

  • ex_norteler

    I guess the 41% market share is for the 40G market, not for the total optical market.

  • gone2moro

    I hear you commrade. :o )

  • oz_ex_nt

    How much is the 47.x.x.x IP address space worth?

  • nortel_cn

    Thanks, got them!

  • nortel_cn

    Thanks, that's what I need!

  • zeroman

    they have a lot of domains. but with IPv6 not much I think.

  • ExNtrl

    NSN might actually be able to make a buck on this buy..The reason I say this is look at Aastra Technologies. Aastra bought the Enterprise Customer Product division that Nortel could never make a buck on (and many people said it was old worn out technology and had no money left in the portfolio). Aastra took the same portfolio, rebrandlined it (didn't make a single technology change) and made boat loads of money
    See the link and notice the same technology that existed 10 plus years ago
    http://www.aastratelecom.com/cps/rde/xchg/SID-3…

    All I can say is I wish NSN good luck and I hope they succeed to show how incompetent the GEnius executive management and BOD are.

    Advice to NSN, keep the workers JCI4 and lower and terminate the upper ranks (you don't need the JCI6 and above). Review the JCI5 on a case by case basis.

  • ExNtrl

    Suggestion to the prospective buyers of Enterprise..Do not take anything at face value and make sure to do your due diligence carefully, you never know what surprise you might find.

  • forgive

    It should be changed to:

    “Advice to NSN, keep the workers JCI3 and lower and terminate the upper ranks (you don't need the JCI5 and above). Review the JCI4 on a case by case basis.”

    + Fire all JCI5 and JCI6.

    Then Nortanic's CDMA+LTE will have a bright future in NSN.

  • How_long

    I knew some highly productive JCI5s. They were overpromoted and should have been only a 4, but that wasn't their fault.

  • farscape

    @ lastCDMAchump

    Don't know where your getting your info from: you're probably one of the Calgary CDMA guys with an axe to grind about the site closure. it should have been closed long time ago, right after Richard Lowe announced that no new product development would happen there.

    There is enough expertise in Ottawa to continue the CDMA work – after all the LTE/WiMax teams are the former CDMA teams, there are still director level groups working full time on CDMA in Ottawa, and CDMA architects are still with the team ;~)

    If you were a true NT CDMA guy, you wouldn't put out so much cr*p about your former colleagues, with half baked truths. Our management made us hurt enough!

    BTW, do you recall when Noy K was in Calgary as director for CDMA H/W development and tried to move all of it in Calgary?

  • slk

    thank you farscape for bringing into the open the precise attitude that destroyed Nortel: politics first, everything else second. Most of Ottawa has no idea what Calgary did or how Calgary helped keep Nortel alive. Good luck with your architects. What a joke.

  • cooluswiz

    Goodbye Enterprise Voice…the prize goes to Siemens !!!!….Data Enterprise ………liquadation………..wow ….we really need to thank our leaders for forward thinking…….

  • lastCDMAchump

    Look pal, you were never my colleague.
    You architects rival the Six Sigma as the biggest joke in Nortel (remember FLEXAM).
    By the way, what was the last product that you design and Nortel made one cent on it?
    Don't say CDMA, because it took Calgary over three years to fixt the crap that you delivered.

  • cooluswiz

    Goodbye Enterprise Voice…the prize goes to Siemens !!!!….Data Enterprise ………liquadation………..wow ….we really need to thank our leaders for forward thinking…….

  • lastCDMAchump

    Look pal, you were never my colleague.
    You architects rival the Six Sigma as the biggest joke in Nortel (remember FLEXAM).
    By the way, what was the last product that you design and Nortel made one cent on it?
    Don't say CDMA, because it took Calgary over three years to fixt the crap that you delivered.

  • TwitterCounter for @markevans
  • Seeking Alpha Certified