Guest Post: Looking Back at the First ZMail

Here’s a guest post about Nortel CEO Mike Zafirovski’s first ZMail to employees.

It’s interesting to take a look back at the first ZMail that Mike Zafirovski sent to the Nortel employees just few weeks after having become CEO in December 2005. Its analysis can provide some insight about his ego.

It can also be used as lessons for the future if you cross paths with decision-makers whose egos and optimism impair their ability to see reality for what it is, and, as a result, make wrong decisions because they are unable to balance their over-confidence and listen to possibly dissent others views and experience.

It starts with a reference to an USA Today article called “Optimism puts rose-colored tint in glasses of top execs”. ZMan prefers to describe himself as a CEO having adopted a “forceful optimism” attitude, his motto he will further develop later on. A mindset, belief (yes, already) and attitude he then expects from everyone at Nortel.

He found it funny to describe CEOs as only “slightly delusional” people, ironically saying that the word should not apply here. Recently, laid-off employees, who feel betrayed by Zafirovski will surely appreciate this statement. Shareholders, too.

Then, there are parts like: “Confidence in ourselves and each other will be critical factors in how far and how fast we take this 110-year-old company”. Well, so far and so fast, Zafirovski, wearing his Rose-Colored Tint glasses, has led Nortel into Pink Sheets, an OTC stock market for NYSE delisted and bankrupt companies .

Here’s the first ZMail

To Nortel employees,

Last Friday night, as I was flying back from a very productive trip to Europe following several customer and employee visits, I came across a newspaper article entitled “Optimism Puts Rose-Colored Tint in Glasses of Top Execs.” Included in the article were quotes like:

“99% of CEOs thought they could lead their companies from crisis;”
“Optimism is all about possibilities, change, hope…without those qualities, how can any leader succeed?;” and,
· “By definition, leaders are slightly delusional.”

My first reaction was to take exception to the word “slightly” . . . .

Seriously, the question of our confidence in ourselves—and as members of Team Nortel—is something I will begin discussing today and a topic I will continue to raise in the coming weeks and months. Confidence in ourselves and each other will be critical factors in how far and how fast we take this 110-year-old company.

I discussed with you in a previous letter our plans for the BIG initiative (Business Transformation, Integrity Renewal and Growth Imperatives), our new leadership values, and our focus on people that will be rolled out as part of Session I in the first quarter. In my first few weeks, I have also spent time evaluating our relative strengths and weaknesses and pinpointing areas for improvement.

In Town Hall sessions in Maidenhead and Châteaufort last week, I repeated some generally-held internal and external views and perceptions of Nortel.

Positives Must Improve

Strong innovation DNA Decision-making processes

Customer partnering Lack of accountability

Global footprint The over-complexity of our processes

Employee talent/qualifications Quality of products/solutions

Loyalty Lack of Focus

Brand No / low profitability (last 9 years)

My strong take-aways and beliefs are that our positives are significant and difficult to replicate. At the same time, our challenges are also significant but, I would argue, very fixable. I don’t believe I am looking through rose-colored glasses, but rather have adopted what I describe as an attitude of “forceful optimism.” This is a mindset, a belief and an attitude that I expect from everyone at Nortel—a combination of positive anticipation for the future combined with a determined approach to maximize positive impact.

Forceful optimism is one of the 30 action attributes supporting our recently-defined Nortel leadership values. And as promised in my last letter to you, I worked with select members of the Leadership Edge program and cabinet members to finalize these attributes before year-end.
[...]

As a positive heads-up to the many people who were hoping to be on the Business Transformation teams, we will be kicking off the Six Sigma Quality Program in the first quarter, and there will be opportunities for involvement and leadership. We will be looking for Six Sigma champions and master black belt, black belt, and green-belt candidates (much more on this early next year).

The combination of the Business Transformation initiative and the Six Sigma Quality Program will improve the basic equation of our business, including higher customer satisfaction, simplified processes, lower cost-of-rework, fewer quality issues and lower costs for our products and business structure. And we’ll see teamwork inside the company improving as a result. We will continue the focus on forceful optimism, leadership and our people agenda by launching our Session I program in the first quarter. The programs and initiatives we deliver as part of Session I will ensure we are building strong leadership capability and bench strength across Nortel.

Lastly, and arguably most important for the long-term health of the business, here are my thoughts on customers and the Growth Imperatives, which you will be hearing much more on throughout 2006. I am meeting and speaking with an increasing number of our customers (e.g. the four largest European customers last week) and our go-to-market and product management teams, and I can’t wait to attend our global sales conferences in January. In my straightforward view, good, profitable growth is to a business as air and water are to flowers. We have much to build on and also much work to do, including how we develop meaningful value propositions for our customers. To this end, I am excited to report that we will be introducing our new business mission at the sales meetings. It will guide much of our behavior externally and internally, and keep the focus where it belongs—on our customers.

Let me wrap it up by saying how privileged and proud I am to be leading Nortel and to be working with all of you. I wish you and your loved ones a relaxing holiday and warm wishes for a healthy, happy, and prosperous 2006.

Thank you for all you are doing for Nortel.

Mike Z

Technorati Tags: ,

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
This entry was posted in Executive Suite. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • unshackled
    bb,

    While your comments won't alleviate the pain of getting laid off without severance (after 20 years) or 1 extra day of insurance, they sure help reinforce the fact that it has very little to do with our own shortcomings but rather those of a useless ELT.

    Another point I'd like to add based on observations I made during my last few months at NT. You can be sure this company will not survive considering that most (if not all) middle-management brainpower is currently being wasted on figuring out the next move to not get laid off. Forget about project management. They are like leaves in the wind. It is terrible.

    Anyway, thanks for your comments. It's good to hear some cold hard facts abt the ruthless man that is ruining the company. Made my day.
  • broadbandbill
    unshackled,

    I can only imagine the pain inflicted to the employees; I hope some smart lawyer figures out a way to successfully litigate future management for ‘pain and suffering caused by no fault of the employees and as a direct result of management actions’. Imo, there is no difference between this type of slow, agonizing pain and sexual, verbal of mental anguish and abuse in the corporate world. Today’s corporate execs do not understand the responsibility they have to the primary stakeholders-the employees themselves.

    As it relates to Nortel the net-net is this: best engineers on the planet paired up with the worst execs in the solar system = disaster! And the irony of it all; knowing Mike Z he wont learn a damn thing out of this experience – his sense of being right is unshakable, which makes him even more delusional than he actually is. I said it before, guys like that scare the living daylights out of me…--bb

  • rfc1149
    It strikes me that the GE management system is a cult.

    Its grand prophet discovered 'The One True Way of MANAGEMENT', and people join to learn the great TRUTH. There is a defined program of indoctrination where worthy acolytes work up through levels being increasingly exposed to truth (exactly like your favorite cult).

    Hence MikeZ is 'delusional'; he has long traveled the way and is a true believer. He is a believer to the point where he simply can neither hear nor understand 'heresy'.

    Of course no-one can reach the absolute understanding of the enlightened prophet, but he did get to the second highest level (the highest occupied by the illustrious Nardelli and Immelt; names spoken only with awe and trepidation).

    It also is why MikeZ had to bring in his 'dream team'. Dealing with heathens uncleansed by the truth would be too distasteful, too uncomfortable to one so enlightened.

    Of course the space ship is waiting behind the comet. If it were not for the recession, Nortel would be there.

    One of the 'funny' things about this cult specifically is the members consider themselves 'leaders'. Of course if there is on thing any leader doesn't do; it is join a cult.

    It also strikes me that it is 'interesting' that MikeZ lacks an MBA. While one can certainly criticize the MBA model (and the model is clearly influenced by GE's 'success') at least that would have exposed him to some 'heretical' business theories (which he would have dismissed) and certainly have forced him to 'think' to dismiss them (great thing about being in a cult - one can avoid any thinking whatsoever).
  • broadbandbill
    rfc,

    Well said; a cult that will NOT admit to being wrong.

    I have said it before; the whole GE lot are a bunch of industrial engineers operating in the age where human capital is THE asset and they are ALL clueless about leveraging it (yet they talk about like they are the experts). You have no idea the temperature of my boiling blood when I hear Jack and Suzy (don’t call me Q) Welch talk about ‘Innovation’. Someone please explain to me what did either one of them do that falls under ‘being innovate; (except extorting money from shareholders). Willing to listen…-bb
  • scalpcutter
    The New Nortel or the New Buyers surely won't have much room for
    Nortel Middle Management. They will want people who actually know the fine details about transferred products and actually do the work that needs to get done. That is what one would think anyway.
    So given the fact most if not all of the lines of businesses are going to
    be sold one cannot be optimistic about the survival of middle managers.
    They should be the most worried. Don't know what "moves" they
    will be capable of making before besides moving on?
    From what I have heard there are still many useless, bloated, overpaid managers at the institution but there are managers they still need obviously for specific lines of businesses. I would truly expect any fat or excess management to definitely be culled when the LOB's are sold. or culled after with what is remaining. Hard to imagine anything remaining though without special post remnant conditions in effect. There are still busy managers at Nortel. Ones who have survived that are not busy are useless are surely next on the list. You can't hide forever. I think everything is up in the air for everyone over there and uncertainity reigns supreme unitl the going forward plan is available and viewable.


  • Nortel watcher
    Scalpy,

    What do you think are the chances for director-level employees leading a business unit be it in EMEA, Asia or CALA to be "absorbed" by the new buyers?
  • malvo187
    Nortel is dead. Shake it off and move on.
  • Got_Out
    From my perspective there are three key aspects to this discussion
    1) Mike Z's ability - clearly he IS very good at driving pennies out of cost structures (product and process). Brought in guys in his own image. Demonstrated that he IS NOT a visionary or strategist. Brought in people to help on that front, but pushed them aside or didnt listen on key topics/decisions. Net: better suited to be a COO, not a CEO.
    2) Mike Z's ego - the driving factor. While he is not particuarly loud or eloquent in discussion, he most often has his mind made up before the discussion starts. Why - because he knows best. While money is always a good thing, he has been driven by leading "the biggest turnaround in business history" and by having "books written about us". These were open statements made many times to the ELT. At the end of the day, only his "inner sanctum" (Dennis C, Joel H) had any real influence on him because they had the history with him and would always publicly defer to him. The worst impact of his ego - he didnt care that he didnt know what he didnt know.
    3) What Nortel needed/what Nortel got. What Nortel needed to be successful in a turnaround was a visionary who could lead a clear strategy, with strong internal/external communications skills and the ability to build/execute the plan to deliver the strategy. Maybe the best parts of Roth, Dunn and Monty all rolled into one, without the shortcomings. What it got was a good operational guy who has no sense of vision, far less courage than he talks about and overall lacked what it took to get the "biggest turnaround in business history" done.

    As others have highlighted, Mike was unsuccessful in getting other big jobs. Jack Welch publicly stated Mike was not "in the top 10" in GE. Did the board have better options at the point - I guess we will never know. What the board DID have was the right guy for the job before they chased him out - Gary D.

    Mike, the GE boys and the dregs of the Nortel Glory Days team that is left will make "business history". Sadly, they will be the subject of case studies at fine institutions of higher learning such as Harvard. The final question will be if the Board got the credit they deserve for their "Say/Do" ratio.
  • less
    I have indeed wondered if Mikey didn't actually sit there as his version of Nortel spiraled downward, thinking: "Woohoo. This turnaround story is getting bigger all the time!"

  • NextOnTheList
    Irrelevant: in ZeroMan's mind, the ONLY cause of Nortel's crash is the financial crisis. Have the BoD swallowed that one? I bet they have
  • broadbandbill
    What BoD?..--bb
  • mryan5050
    Mike Z , he failed all of us. he failed, he is a failure, you cant blame a loser from being a loser, so I dont blame him, i blame the board.........the board should have taken action a long time ago, but loser's hang together. I just hope they took enough money from Nortel to drink 24/7.........Mike I am sure you wont read this, but I hope your family does, your a failure.
  • broadbandbill
    Though you are correct, Mike Z does NOT care what you/we think becaue he has no soul!!!!! And his country club membership is still active...--bbb
  • protosphere
  • whatnext4nt
    Nortel is dying; there is no way to put a really positive spin on it, at least from the naive “I believe” point of view (are there really any IBIN’s left?). The funeral is not long coming now. I think we are headed for a relatively quick sale of the major assets, and then on to Ch 7 and corporate death. This is what is best for the creditors, ex-employees, and pensioners (all creditors actually). However, new opportunities for many will arise from the ashes of Nortel’s cremation; some people will get good jobs with the acquiring companies and others will find new and exciting opportunities elsewhere. Creditors will not get all they are owed but they will get more than pennies on the dollar, and I hope that the ex-employees and pensioners get some preferential treatment.

    There will be hardships or at least lifestyle adjustments for many people let go during this difficult economic period. Some people will decide to move out of state, province or even country – this will be very hard on them and/or their family and friends, but eventually people will adapt to the new situations and get back to focusing on the pleasures of life.

    I think that ex-employees should get together to create a monument to Nortel at the Carling Campus, maybe even a small museum. It really was something special and it is worth preserving some mementos of the good, the bad, and the ugly for future generations to reflect on.

    Nortel
    R.I.P.
    1895-2009
    Cause of death: Executive Greed and Incompetence.
  • The psychiatrist
    Anyone see any parallels between Conquest Travel and Nortel in their actions leading up to bankruptcy filing?


    for me it's just another example of immoral people misleading everyone so long as the top directors continue to make sure they collect their undeserving and disproportionate wages relative to the companies financial health in which they work for.

    It seems the more money people make the less prone they are to any sense of shame.
  • scalpcutter
    Alot of you people in here sure like to live in the past.
  • OldBNR1
    GE never considers Mike Z as having CEO capabilities and Motorola does not want him as CEO. Unfortunately Nortel BOD begs to differ, and the result is predictably disastrous for Nortel
  • broadbandbill
    You are half-right. After he was REJECTED by MOT he went to interview for the then-CEO job at HP; one meeting w/HP’s BoD is all it took to eliminate him. He (Z) also threw his hat at then-Boeing CEO spot (note conflict of interest since he was already a Director –clue #1) but, once again, REJECTED!

    During an informal lunch he informed me of a ‘potential’ CEO offer from a tech vendor if and only if they paid off a non-compete clause (was clue #2). Nortel’s BoD had no other viable options; only has-beens and future has-beens would accept an assignment in Telecom Siberia and Z was the ONLY one willing and able (but not willing enough to pony up the US$11M for breach of contract- clue #3).

    So, Nortel’s BoD ended up with exactly what they paid for - a trophy-seeking megalomaniac that was clueless, useless and, sadly, vision-less. As one of the greatest Canadians (John Kenneth Galbraith) once stated: ‘People get the government they deserve’ – which also applies to employees getting the management they deserve! …--bb
  • yes4aapl
    During an informal lunch he informed me of a ‘potential’ CEO offer from a tech vendor if and only if they paid off a non-compete clause (was clue #2). Nortel’s BoD had no other viable options; only has-beens and future has-beens would accept an assignment in Telecom Siberia and Z was the ONLY one willing and able (but not willing enough to pony up the US$11M for breach of contract- clue #3).
    broadbandbill
    ======
    re
    what simple math would say about that one?
    1. Mike Z signed $11 mill or so deal of sitting on his a$$ for 2 years.
    2. In that time he gets CEO job at Nortel and he is paid handsome money.
    so the money he got from Nortel add to his $11 mill in the bank from MOT
    3. Nortel paid MOT to settle the issue.
    and
    the double winner was.. Mike Z, greedy liar and talentless CEO!
    He was one of many who contributed to Nortel's culture.
    my opinion
    yes4aapl
  • broadbandbill
    Though Z is indeed Greedy and Talentless, he did NOT pocket $11M from MOT; that was a penalty NT paid to MOT for Z's breach of contract w/MOT; I am certain he justifies it by not getting the CEO position he feels he so 'richly deserved'...--bb
  • XPM_guy
    "‘People get the government they deserve’ – which also applies to employees getting the management they deserve!"

    I'm not sure I agree with this analogy because while voters have some input, however fleeting and constrained, in the process of choosing a government, the employees of Nortel had no say whatsoever over the parade of CEOs the BoD threw money at.

    When Mike Z was presented to us like a shiny turd, and the BoD decided to shower him & Motorola with millions for the privilege of teaching him about the telecom equipment industry (which is quite different from manufacturing cell phones for consumers), like most of my co-workers I was skeptical.

    But why wish for pain, so we all hoped he would not do too much damage during his 3-5 year plan before his golden parachute deployed. Maybe the next one will know what he/she is doing...

    Now it looks like Mike Z will be the last CEO in Nortel's illustrious 114 year history. So it goes. But I fail to see how I did anything to deserve this - I'm not a member of the BoD, nor am I a senior executive addicted to bonuses and full of hubris. I'm just a poor slob that done his best for the last 25+ years to make the customer happy...

    So how is this all somehow the fault of dedicated employees like me?
  • broadbandbill
    As Dr. Phil would say “Don’t play the victim me.”

    Employees have a lot of power; nothing would be done without the work of the talented engineers and sales guys at Nortel but that power was never fully utilized. Sadly (and perhaps now regrettably) Nortel’s rank and file just took the abuse and kept working hoping thing would improve. The French employees’ demonstrations would have been a good action item to have undertaken a year ago. Nothing like exposing these under-achieving, over-compensated yoyos that have only their self-interest in mind....--bb
  • NortelEmp
    BB - what are you doing on this blog? Based on what you have done, are capable of doing, could be doing, why do you spend time here? This is not a jab, but a sincere question.
  • broadbandbill
    NE,

    I am and will be using this blog and its many insightful posts by very passionate and talented folks inside and outside of Nortel as a basis of a book I have been contemplating to write for some time now. Its title is “Fail First!” – How Corporate America Lost its Soul by Focusing on the Bottom Line Only. I also have the first chapter: ‘Success, Like Failure, Has No Memory’.

    Suffice it to say Z and his GEngsters have certainly provided a great deal of material. And I am deeply disappointed with Z’ complete lack of character; this is a man that initially bragged about his Say/Do ratio being equal to 1. Hope that answers a great question…--bb
  • NortelEmp
    Answers the question and annoys me. You are beating me to it.

    If you are going to cite me, you will need to request my permission. There might be copyright costs.

    ;)
  • broadbandbill
    Public domain :); and tnx--bb
  • skeptical2009
    Less and scalpcutter are the biggest blowhards around here. scalpcutter is a bitter racist (calls himself 'straight shooting' but that's his opinion of himself) and less is just bitter in general that likes to wisecrack on inconsequentials. BB's not so bad - posts a lot but not so irksome.
  • broadbandbill
    Tnx s---2009, I try my best :)...--bb
  • less
    In my straightforward view, good, profitable growth is to a business as air and water are to flowers.

    Translation: I'll be incommnicado, my bunker, straight forward faced, pushing up daisies. enjoying the view.

    Oh and Nortel is green
  • yes4aapl
    OK Nortel is in Chapter 11
    How many of posters here talked about that possibility in advance, one year ago, five years ago?
    Not only there was no discussion about that but also those who mentioned Ch11 were attached and ridiculed.
    Critics of Nortel provided many examples, visible signs of Ch11 approaching very fast.
    Why BOD did not see it?
    Why management did not see it?
    How I see Nortel and why it happened?
    For obvious reasons I looked only at the Big Picture and just used simple math available to my disposal. All my DD and research was done with simple tools and publicly available reports and information showed me one year ago that 2008 will be the last “normal” year for Nortel.
    Oh please, those I believe and optimists don't try your tricks on this board.
    Nortel is a Dinosaur destined to die or a Titanic to sink under water, your choice.
    We talked about that in last 5 years.
    Have we done good predictions and showed good understanding of Nortel?
    Let me tell you the other side of the story.
    Nortel used to be $300-400 bill market cap gorilla.
    It means Nortel had unlimited financing available for any scientific business predictions_formulation_caricaturisation_variations_modifications....
    unlimited financing and what happened?
    Chapter 11
    Stay tuned for showing you real reasons of Nortel BK!
    Yes4aapl
    disclosure
    I am not an insider, just the watchdog!
    btw
    I think DeskJokey got it!



  • yes4aapl
    It's a cont. and a reply to a post on this blog but I can not find it now
    so....
    here it is
    Letting Nortel survive on public money with the management they have would be a huge blunder. The decision making capacity of the management in Nortel is about as bad as it can get. In addition to that the cuture is just as bad if not worse.
    ==========
    re
    You've got it right.
    I think every one has heard about Nortel's culture.
    After few articles that mentioned Nortel's culture I tried to guess what was it about?
    Why CSCO'a culture makes CSCO strong and profitable and why Nortel's culture resulted in Chapter 11 bankrupcy?
    What CEO Bill Owens said about that culture himself?
    He said that his subordinates misinformed him very often.
    I assume they wrote reports with false info, false numbers and he as CEO used that in his business decisions.
    I assume that after CEO's B Owens departure many subordinates stayed at Nortel to write reports for the new CEO Mike Zafiro....
    The culture does not change easily, does it?
    Nortel's culture; Nortel's way or highway!
    ===========
    How executive pay incentives poisoned Nortel
    Nortel's top executives took home $400 million, even as they laid the groundwork for the company's slide into bankruptcy protection, James Bagnall reports.
    James Bagnall, The Ottawa Citizen
    Published: Saturday, February 07, 2009
    ...
    "Nortel changed from an engineering culture that favored innovation to one that exalted pay and bonuses," says a former vice-president. "We never recovered." The extent of Nortel Networks' fall from grace is shocking.
    --------
    James Bagnall, The Ottawa Citizen
    Published: Friday, June 20, 2008
    Pity the potential jury that must deal with this mess. Four years after he was sacked for cause, former Nortel Networks CEO Frank Dunn -- along with two former financial executives, Douglas Beatty and Michael Gollogly -- was charged yesterday by the RCMP with cooking the company's books.
    Each is accused of two counts of fraud affecting the public market, two counts of falsifying documents and three counts of preparing a false prospectus.
    ......
    The circumstantial case against Dunn and his cohorts is strong. A series of civil investigations into Nortel uncovered a culture that encouraged "hardness" -- the term for financial reserves that were tapped to magically change losses into profits.
    The reserves were created during the dark days of 2001 and 2002, when Nortel was imploding. Offices were closed, tens of thousands of employees were sacked and supply contracts terminated.
    Nortel's accountants made estimates of the future liabilities and entered them in the books. However, it turned out that the estimates were too pessimistic. Empty offices were filled; employees left without collecting severance.
    Under proper accounting rules, Nortel should have reduced its estimates for future liabilities during the quarter in which the new information came to light. Under Dunn, the connection between fresh knowledge and the related accounting entry wasn't as tight as it should have been.
    "Dunn and others stretched the judgment inherent in the provisioning process to create a flexible tool to achieve earnings ... targets," concluded an independent review for Nortel by the Washington law firm Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr.
    It's not exactly the sort of stuff that will keep a jury pumped with adrenalin.
    It probably won't be difficult for the Crown to find people to testify about the aggressive accounting culture at Nortel.
    yes4aapl
  • NortelEmp
    June 8, 2008.

    It seemed like every analyst bought into the pretty PPT slides (I never saw them so nice looking). It was the worst outcome for "analyst day" because the analysts' support made the executives believe in their story. But the stories made no sense. The outlooks were not possible, the financial benefits were not telling the whole story. The whole issue of revenue recognition was confusing even the best analysts, who although questioned some of the numbers, somehow joined the band wagon when it came to overall assessments. They must have been impressed by the slides.

    June 8 was a bad day, because everyone thought it was so good.

    http://www.nortel.com/corporate/investor/ev.html#past
  • yeah_whatevah
    Z is irrelevant now. Increasingly, so too are the BU presidents.
    The people who matter are
    Mellon bank
    Canadian Pension fund
    UK Pension fund (soon to be UK government PPF)
    US, Canadian and UK Courts.
    E&Y and Pavi in that order.

  • rfc1149
    Exactly right except for one small quibble.


    Z is irrelevant now. Increasingly, s So too are the BU presidents.

    I can't remember the BU presidents ever being relevant. The are simply very highly paid bureaucrats. They contribute 'value' like when told to cut their budgets 10%, they tell each of their GMs to cut their budgets by 10%.
  • NTblinker
  • Guest
    Discussing this loser is becoming a total waste of bandwidth. Can't he just fade off into the sunset?
  • shutupanddrinkyourmilk
    Amen brother! Unfortunately, he is fading off like the nuclear cloud - devastating everything in his wake.
  • NortelSouth
    Nortel CALA Enterprise fired 30% of the workforce this week...
  • Nortel watcher
    NS,

    That's a huge number considering the folks in CALA were not included in the BK filing in the States and, therefore, were not as exposed PLUS there were at last count only 250 to 275 people in Sunrise. That last count figure is one I vaguely remember and may be somewhat off.

    I wonder how much of a beauty contest it came down to especially under the BU structure with friends looking out for other friends. Well, at least at the director level, they are now 30% of the way toward getting their KEIP bonus as well as Barrios toward his KERP bonus.

    I wonder how bad the South Florida job market is for experienced telecom people?
  • NortelSouth
    NW,
    30% reduction has been hit Nortel Enterprise CALA across the region, not only Sunrise but Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Chile and the other countries..Nortel Enterprise in CALA accounted for 150-160 between Sunrise and the region, so I guess is 30-40 people been fired. Although these countries are not impacted by Ch 11 filling, I got notice Nortel is paying the minimal required by local laws, which is not the historical behavior.
    And regarding who is milking KEIP/KERP with this reductions, is not Barrios because since Q4, Nortel Enterprise CALA reports directly to Joel "The Chocker" Hackney, so blame him...Not a surprise at all, right?
    I guess if someone ask him, he will say "It was a difficult decision, but it was absolutely necessary to make Nortel leaner, more focused and financial sound in CALA"
    It would be funny if it was not so sad. I had some very good friends with children and they are at home in a really though environment...
  • Nortel watcher
    NS,

    Yeap, that picture sucks for sure. So, is it correct to infer that the other BUs were spared, like Carrier VOiP and Carrier Wireless, for example, or was the 30% across the board.

    Lastly, how many people are now left in Sunrise?
  • Singapore1
    Oh my, what a disgrace.............
  • NTblinker
    --Nortel Networks cash reserves show increase in U.S.

    http://www.ottawacitizen.com/Business/Nortel+Networks+cash+reserves+show+increase/1500645/story.html

    What's up to Nortel?

    Could Nortel be a strong threat to Cisco?
  • Still_waiting
    Interesting tidbit from the article "Nortel disclosed in the filing that it generated $2 billion in bankruptcy-related liabilities during the six-week period." It appears that the lawyers are getting their share.
  • yeah_whatevah
    I'm pretty sure that's an incorrect interpretation of the numbers in docket 601. $2 billion is the total pre-filing liabilities on the balance sheet for the US company. That's an estimate based on how they think the restructuring will pan out. Breakdown is as follows

    Trade and accounts payable $447
    Accounts payable intercompany $442
    Restructuring liabilities $80
    Long term dept $243
    Pension obligations $558
    Postretirement obligations $28
    Other $23
    Total $1,848
  • shutupanddrinkyourmilk
    Mind numbing experience coming to an end ... PRICELESS!
  • Casual_Observer
    when you don't have to pay any bills other than employee salaries, your cash reserve can go up.
  • TongueInCheek
    Actually, they are responsible for and have been paying (according to court documents) accounts payable that are post-petition.
  • sick_sigma
    That is true. HOWEVER......

    Keep in mind that there is a natural lag in billing. Nortel billed their customers for business in Q4 2008 and many/most of those invoices flowed in as receivables to Nortel in Q1 2009. Our customers were forced to keep paying us, obviously.

    On the other hand, many of the debts that NT created in Q4 2008 -- which we would have normally been forced to pay out during Q1 2009 -- did not need to be paid because of the bankruptcy.

    AR and AP obligations for Q4 are typically reconciled in Q1. In this case the AR remained steady while the AP dropped off significantly. Short term bump for Nortel.

    The financial chickens will come home to roost rather quickly though. AP will float back up to standard levels to support business operations post filing, even in spite of all the layoffs. In short, AP starts soaring back up while AR erodes badly. Not a pretty combination for Nortel.
  • NortelEmp
    These are the things that the average reporter seems to miss. Revenue recognition is complicated. Nortel cannot recognize revenue until the last bolt is shipped. So stuff that was sold, shipped, etc.. last year, might only be recognized in Q1 (or Q2, if typically shipping problems are occurring). Yes, it's revenue, but pre-filing revenue, from when customers thought they were buying from a going concern. The true test will be the following two quarters, because they will reflect what happened in Q1 (from a rev rec point of view).
  • sick_sigma
    You are exactly correct Nortel Emp. You hit the nail on the head.

    Here is the whole story in a nutshell....

    ** Many pre-filing sales/AR from Q4 spilled over into Q1 as part of the natural business process.

    ** Many pre-filing debts/AP from Q4 did not spill into Q1 because of the artificial obstacle known as bankruptcy.

    Add all that together and you get a short term bump for the balance sheet. This phenomenon is even more pronounced for bankrupt companies with slow billing cycles -- such as Nortel.

    In a few weeks the Nortel executives will present the financial results for Q1 of 2009. Do not be surprised if they shamelessly try to exploit this artificial boost in the balance sheet as being the result of some sort of great accomplishment on their part. The financial analysts will very easily recognize the real truth behind the artificially inflated numbers -- even if the media does not.
  • joremero
    "Could Nortel be a strong threat to Cisco?"
    lol

    it depends if Nortel employees get some C-4 and head to Cisco buildings
  • malvo187
    OH Z... This guy is such a loser and he just doesn't get it.
  • felixmk
    Right from the start he thought the problem was execution that could be fixed with 6 sigma. If you are a hammer, everything else looks like a nail. The reality was that Nortel had too many old products and some poorly performing new ones and it lacked scale or leadership in any business. Mike spent all his time trying to improve execution while the telecom business evolved away from Nortel (or vice versa).
  • nblog
    Wow my laptop was only 2 years old when Z sent that email. Due to multiple hard drive crashes though I have lost that 'gem' until now. Thank you for all the posts you are making.
  • gone2moro
    Some how Zman reminds me of the evil candy man in the move "Chitty Chitty Bang Bang" or the guy who takes Pichochio to the island were all the kids turn into donkeys..... we'll he's certainly made an ass out of a lot of us who believed him.
  • NortelEmp
    Many troubling statements in the email, but this one is of particular interest:

    "Forceful optimism is one of the 30 action attributes supporting our recently-defined Nortel leadership values. "

    IWhen Z came on board, the issue to fix wasn't leadership, or teamwork. The company was struggling because of outdated business models and a horrible balance sheet. Instead of looking at the systemic issues, his response was to claim that it was a people problem - that people were not behaving properly and therefore he had to guide them towards the propre behaviours. He used programs like LSS, OwnIt, etc... as a means to measure individuals and teams, but against what?

    He didn't get it, he never got it. He always saw everything as a people problem - bad employees, bad managers, everyone was bad, underperforming, except those that bought into the programs that he implemented. But those programs were quality improvement programs, which are useless if all they do is make bad processes more inefficient.
  • angermanagement
    as the great Peter Drucker said:

    "Nothing is less productive than to make more efficient what should not be done at all."
  • NortelTragedy
    Profound was Dr. Drucker ... how simplistically insightful he was.
  • NortelEmp
    Music to my ears.
blog comments powered by Disqus
  • TwitterCounter for @markevans
  • Seeking Alpha Certified
data recovery