Richard Lowe Speaks Up

Seems like Nortel executives are reaching out to employees. Here’s a letter to the carrier network from Richard Lowe”

CN Employees,

The past several weeks have been the most challenging of my career, and no doubt they feel the same for many of you. While things are difficult from where I stand, I know that in
many ways they are even more difficult for you and your families, and I thank you for hanging in there and continuing to fight this difficult battle together.

Since January 14, the leadership team and I have been reaching out to our customers, suppliers and partners to explain the process we’re going through, and how it’s likely to unfold in the coming weeks and months. Our basic message has been this: despite the restructuring work that must take place, we’re focused on maintaining our network performance commitments to customers, delivering our POR, and ensuring that the supply chain continues to meet the plan.

I’m pleased to report that much of this stabilization work is complete, and that our customers are gaining confidence in our ability to deliver during the restructuring process. I’ve now spoken with virtually all our tier one customers, and most of our tier two and three customers, and they are universally supportive of Nortel and the steps we’re taking. Today’s announcements mark a key milestone on the path to becoming a stable and competitive company.

With today’s news we’re taking the necessary steps in advance of our overall business and restructuring plan to resize our business to match the current market reality. I won’t repeat the basic news: there are comprehensive tools and explanations located HERE, but I’d like to add a little additional context. First, the job actions that will be taking place, over the coming weeks and months and in accordance with local country legal requirements, are absolutely necessary to reduce our cash burn and assist in having the resources we need for any additional measures under the comprehensive restructuring yet to come.

Technorati Tags:

Economic conditions remain tough, carrier customer spending is down, and we need to make the needed course corrections today to align ourselves with this new reality. Many of the reductions you’ll see are basic adjustments to size our workforce to the market. Some will be as a direct result of our strategic decision to exit mobile WiMAX as announced a few weeks ago. While I can’t go into the details of precisely where and when the impacts will be felt, I assure you that we’re doing everything possible to be as transparent and proactive with you as we can in the current environment.

The second item to note is that today’s news does not change any of our current strategic mandates. Our POR and contract delivery commitments remain in place. We remain focused on driving earnings and feature releases in our foundational GSM and CDMA businesses. We continue to invest in CVAS, where we enjoy the acknowledged #1 share position in CVoIP, and where our applications focus is starting to resonate with customers seeking new sources of revenue for their own businesses.

Despite our disappointment with Verizon’s phase 4 announcement, our LTE solution has gained traction with KDDI and TMO International. We must shake off any disappointment and focus on meeting our LTE program and trial milestones while we continue to explore partnership options for our LTE solution.

Finally, you’ll see that we’re taking some basic steps to re-affirm that the stakeholders are aligned in their desire to move through this process quickly. Incentive programs like those announced today are aligned to both our creditor’s goals to quickly and cost effectively restructure the business, and our own to ensure that employees are encouraged to drive forward in the face of an extremely difficult environment.

Next week I’ll host my regular quarterly GIS to provide you updates on our business and the restructuring process. Most importantly, I’ll be providing a readout on recent customer suppliers in the last few weeks. What you’ll hear me say is that our customers, suppliers, and partners are universally and overwhelmingly supportive. They want Nortel to win. They want us to come through this process and to thrive as a vibrant, stable and profitable company. They have offered whatever support they can to help us get through this quickly and effectively. That, together with driving our established business priorities, is exactly where I will be focusing my personal efforts in the weeks and months to come. Over the coming weeks we will experience the departure of friends and colleagues.

I’d like to thank everyone that is being impacted for their many contributions to the company, and for the sacrifices they’ve made on Nortel’s behalf. I ask the rest of you to be supportive of these individuals at this difficult time and at the same time to remain focused on our business priorities as these changes take place, so that one day we can perhaps welcome our co-workers back to a revitalized and growing Nortel – one that the rest of us are tasked with recreating. The best chance to help those that are leaving is to rebuild a business that can thrive.

I look forward to speaking to you all next week at the CN Webcast.

Richard

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
This entry was posted in Enterprise, Executive Suite. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • Hotwheeler1

    Same old horse sh.t ! Like the rest of the execs' BS-mails.

    Richard Lowe should have been ejected just like they did to the rest of the employees in WiMAXe program this week. He's just as incompetent as the rest of the LOB “leaders”.

    Under his leadership, Carrier division has accumulated the highest amount of Goodwill writedowns – hello MPE, UMTS, WiMAXe, Avici router, Alvarion …million of dollars down the toilet.

    Wonder how he manages to stay on this train wreck that long !….He's Z's biggest recurring nightmare.

  • scalpcutter

    Sounds like lowe is prepping the wireless folks for mass layoffs.
    He has never sent something out like that before.
    Note how late and urgent his message is.
    He probably just got around to it now because he has been too busy at the trough. I think wireless is in for HUGE reductions and or a sell off.

  • Another_Nortel_Watcher

    Richard who?

  • YesWeCould

    quote : The best chance to help those that are leaving is to rebuild a business that can thrive …. one day we can perhaps welcome our co-workers back

    Oh so sweet… isn't that beatiful? -sigh- Reminds me of Owens' farewell webcast sharing with us the little cristal heart a shareholder had sent him for his good work… I'm worried… hope Owens is still receiving his monthly cheque …

    quote : remain focused … oops sorry.

    And why? Oh, yes, refer to quote1…

  • rfc1149

    So the 'plan' is to keep all current deliverables (except WIMAX) while eliminating 10-20% of staff?

    Same ole, same ole keeping spreading thinner and thinner…

  • less

    I recall how Bill Clinton felt our pain. Then he went and felt up Monica.

    Doing so helped shape Hillary into a true leader and into the newer, kinder face of America abroad. Theres no reason to doubt that Nortel, too, will be re-(re-re-) recognized as the leader in a few months, thanks to sexy Chapter 11.

  • vn99693

    Lowe holds a BSC in Engineering Chemistry and a PhD in Physical Chemistry …

  • Another_Nortel_Watcher

    I laughed at that one too.

    Don't worry, unlike Nortel, Carrier Networks has a plan. In fact CN has a new plan every week! No need to bust your butt trying to achieve your deliverables in CN because they'll be obsolete and replaced by a new set of deliverables in a week or two. Just look busy when the empty suit walks by.

  • 4merEmployee22

    How the hell can you ” perhaps welcome co-workers back to
    a revitalized and growing Nortel”? When it is slowly
    being dismantled…. like the AVRO ARROW JET to me???

    Will he welcome back also some retirees? Who lost or will loose
    their pensions and retirement allowances??? I understand that
    the mandatory age of retirement.. is now 71 years old???

  • felixmk

    Why is Lowe still there? He likes Mike!

  • protosphere

    Their aging CDMA (in favor of GSM) is tanking which was almost all their earnings. What GSM?

    They are disappointed that their largest customer's (Vorizon) decision with LTE like they were with Sprint who announced using others for WiMax which they derisked to exit.

    What other 4G/LTE avenues are there after selling their 3G/UMTS to ALA+LU to migrate customers from.

    Competitors have already made provisions to transition their customer exodus.

    Even Putian way back used Noika and BT initially used others in the largest tender I have seen in half a decade, money losing paying for revenues like PEC, BSNL had to have Ericsson repair their mess, etc., so where is all this optimism in recovery stemming from today in an exponentially worse climate when they couldn't get it right after selling billions in paper and so many assets let alone now?

    Will any cuts amount to what they have burned, and what will be left to hold the fort with their margins on the remaining business.

    Directionless they do not even know where the impacts will be felt, yet he said, yet they are trying to be transparent as possible with employees that are not allowed to speak with the media.

    He is also expressing hope during the most challenging time of his career, as Carrier spending tanks…

    I love this part, incentive programs announced today are aligned to ensure that employees are encouraged. It took long enough but now even the green team is well versed with traditional Nortellese and defending pay practices, trading options for cash and increasing lawsuit insurance as they axe employees/severances challenged with markets before let alone now.

    How can they all reiterate customer confidence when revenue declined 20% before folding let alone now… who are they trying to convince in this worsening trend and the worse boat they have ever been in. Themselves? I guess this “battle” to rally troops is part of their job when they already lost the war.

  • French_Connection

    They have fired the FakeMikeZ, what a shame!
    It was getting funnier every day!
    Well done, whoever you are.

    Maybe they'll fire z real one next?

  • protosphere

    My goodness. More academic credentials than a BSc. in Math!
    At least he speaks much better than his HR people

    I wonder if a Telecom-for-Dummies handbook would have assisted this green team missing in action during the telecom wars.

    In retrospect, perhaps telecom veteran Gary should have been taken more seriously than slandered. Who knows what vision he presented to conflict with the management team so gravely to so abrupt depart with the other telecom veteran Gary. I wonder if anything could have made Notell more furious than perhaps his suggesting they have restructured earlier lest printing billions and selling assets to this. Too bad he was too polite to detail exactly what his plan was, what happened, albeit not sounding optimistic at the time …and it seems he was proven right in retrospect.

    Hiring Mike to hide and rush out the stellar high profiler they used to buffer the fraud fallout should have been as much of a heads up as hiring ex-Marconni's Binning in what was coming. Betting on cost reductions alone and a plan they already had in place Mike later reiterated with the greatest of optimism to the relentless end, …well, to today.

    How can they manage telecom with no telecom experience. it is not as though they are mass producing light bulbs or plastic polymers or something… Are there any electrical engineers at all on the management board? Do they learn on the job, directionless, asking stupid questions looking to throw in their 2 cents in Ninja chop-chop whenever they can to look clever if they wake them up long enough to pay attention? =) Tell me they don't toss paper airplanes in the bored room with Hack and Mikey. Just what do they do? Although Z and Binning sound like they know what they are formally doing with numbers, what is what is the bottom line when we cut to the chase?

    Education and tolerance are correlated. What are Hack's credentials? Never mind, I do not want to know.

  • protosphere

    In all fairness, I wonder if Mike regrets embarassingly paying back Motorola with Nortel's money than to have searched for another career. given he played net in a game of darts with Nortanic with all the endless, endless, contradictions.

    Was the lure to Nortel that great? What was the carrot?

    He defrauding an agreement he signed on several occasions with his ex-employer who passed him by for the CEO job, as he joined a company struggling to regain credibility as the very first red flag from day one.

    Ethics is the root to success or failure in my eyes, in how one guides themself, and the actions they take, facilitating or destroying support through greater or lesser transparency to the good and bad news.

    The lure of the title and almighty buck is not always the best way to risk careers or climb the corporate ranks for those looking to assess future positions.

    Feel comfortable with the team you are working with and not working for. =)

    Nortel already had enough fall guys.

    Poor Mike, victim of the old Nortel lure in yet another way as it effected every life it touches like Madussa when it comes to the root of all evil, the love of money. =) Today? Employee incentives to appease creditors!

  • One_way_ticket_to_Chapter_7

    Aw …. I need a kleenex…. I saw this and couldn't stop being all dewy and wanting a hug from my touchy feelie boss who is about to can me.

    Those dearly departed will be welcomed back by Richard Lowe.

    I wonder if they will also get a puppy and some flowers and candy too when they come back.

    I also wonder how much of that Richard Lowe even wrote.

    Meanwhile those who most contributed to this mess like Richard L will keep on earning their grossly inflated salaries and benefits and likely now get a quarterly bonus.

    The other thing that makes me wretch is everytime I hear about “how tough this is on the management team” or “The past several weeks have been the most challenging of my career”. I couldn't care less about the impact on Mike Z, Richard L, Joel, Pavi, blowhard Phil E, or brown nosing Samih. Their actions indicate they couldn't care less about me or those I think highly of.

    They must think the people reading it are stupid. Oh, what a minute, lots of my peers do believe it so now I know why this crappy effluent keeps on flowing downhill.

  • less

    “Former co-workers” would likely be welcomed back as contractors, but management would remain largely unchanged throughout.

  • exnt2

    not really. management will also be demoted so no need to hire contractors.

  • Got_Out

    Couple of interesting points.

    “The second item to note is that today’s news does not change any of our current strategic mandates. Our POR and contract delivery commitments remain in place.”
    Yet again, there is an assumption that already stretched and demoralized teams are now going to maintain the Plan Of Record with fewer people and while the upheaval of departures/changes go on? Customers should sleep better.

    “Many of the reductions you’ll see are basic adjustments to size our workforce to the market.”
    So this isnt reductions are part of the CCRA/Chapt 11 restructuring, they are part of an adjustment due to market conditions? Not that anyone thought otherwise, but the pain is far from over folks.

    The Carrier businesses at Nortel has been in rough shape for a number of years, but it was masked by the performance of CDMA and more recently the LG-Nortel buildout of Korean Telecom. Both boons are over. Reality has settled in.

  • OneOfThe1300

    “I ask the rest of you to be supportive of these individuals at this difficult time and at the same time to remain focused on our business priorities as these changes take place, so that one day we can perhaps welcome our co-workers back to a revitalized and growing Nortel – one that the rest of us are tasked with recreating.”

    Dear Richard,

    If I should come back to Nortel one day, the only kind of welcome that I'll be interested in is the kind that's spelled M-O-N-E-Y — as in, “the money that Nortel already owes me.”

  • Nortelguy

    Yes Richard. The last few weeks have been pretty challening in my career too. Especially so, since Nortel made me a creditor instead of paying me $40k of Q4 SIP that I earned by selling nearly $20m new Nortel equipment in 2008 & sweating blood to close over my quota for the year.

    So yes, the continuining incompetence of the Z team is pretty galling.

  • Pingback: Richard Lowe: The Patronizer « Nortel Insider - by Desk Jockey

  • http://nortelinsider.wordpress.com/ Desk Jockey
  • rfc1149

    The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over again and expecting different results.

    This email is right out of of BlackAdder Goes Forth (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1oxtxB_mT0 ~8:20)
    Set in the British trenches during the first world war. The main character Captain BlackAdder (typical Nortel employee) is simply trying to avoid being slaughtered. There is the callous, entitled and buffoonish General Melchett (say Lowe in this case), the 'believer' Lieutenant George (Hugh Laurie) and the sycophant Captain Darling.

    (http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2007/01/quo…)
    GENERAL MELCHETT (Lowe): Now Field Marshal Haig (MikeZ) has formulated a brilliant new tactical plan to ensure final victory in the field.
    CAPTAIN BLACKADDER: Ah, would this brilliant plan involve us climbing out of our trenches and walking very slowly toward the enemy, sir? (Laying off a large number of employees)
    CAPTAIN DARLING: How could you possibly know that, Blackadder? It's classified information.
    CAPTAIN BLACKADDER: It's the same plan that we used last time, and the 17 times before that.
    GENERAL MELCHETT: Ex- . . . ex- . . . ex- . . . actly! And that is what is so brilliant about it! It will catch the watchful Hun totally off guard. Doing precisely what we've done 18 times before is exactly the last thing they'll expect us to do this time! There is, however, one small problem.
    CAPTAIN BLACKADDER: That everyone always gets slaughtered in the first ten seconds?
    GENERAL MELCHETT: That's right. And Field Marshal Haig (MikeZ) is worried that this may be depressing the men a tad. So he's looking to find a way to cheer them up.
    CAPTAIN BLACKADDER: Well, his resignation and suicide would seem the obvious.
    General Melchett: Interesting thought. Make a note of it, Darling

    or (episode 4 'General Hospital' toward the end).
    Melchett: You look surprised, Blackadder.
    Blackadder: I certainly am sir. I didn't realize we had any battle (business) plans.
    Melchett: Of course we've got plans! How else do you think our battles are directed?
    Blackadder: Our battles are directed, sir?
    Melchett: Of course they are. Directed accoring to the grand plan.
    Blackadder: Oh I see. And would that be the plan to continue with total slaughter until everybody's dead except Field Marshal Haig (MikeZ), Lady Haig(miniZ Hackney), and their tortoise, Alan (Lowe?)?
    Melchett: Great Scott! Even you know it!

  • netas

    Can someone please comment on the mentioned additional measures to prevent cash burn?

    i do not understand. wasn't it possible for Nortel to fire 3200 employees without issuing bankruptcy protection? it seem to me all disclosed measures so far could have been done without going bankruptcy protection.

    in the mean time, when i take a look at the first monitor report the total cash available as of Dec 31, 2008 was US$2,44 bn. when you compare it with the 3Q2008 number of US$2,3 bn, the company's cash seems like rose by US$144 mn. so that the year end result may not look like as bad as people think.

    yet, when we look at the second monitor report issued as of Jan 31, 2009, the total cash was said to come down to US$2,37 bn, reflecting a decline of US$70 mn to 2008-end figure . But when taking into the company's frozen liabilities to its suppliers and creditors, the real number could have been lower by a couple of US$100 mn. so 1Q2009 results may be a disappointing one.

    i appreciate any comments on my question regarding the possible measures to come in the near future.

    regards,

  • yes4aapl

    i do not understand. wasn't it possible for Nortel to fire 3200 employees without issuing bankruptcy protection? it seem to me all disclosed measures so far could have been done without going bankruptcy protection.

    in the mean time, when i take a look at the first monitor report the total cash available as of Dec 31, 2008 was US$2,44 bn. when you compare it with the 3Q2008 number of US$2,3 bn, the company's cash seems like rose by US$144 mn. so that the year end result may not look like as bad as people think.
    netas
    ============
    re
    Nortel had to do ch11 with few main reasons
    1. $1 bill in deficit of Pension Plan cash payment coming
    2. $500 mill a year interest for the debt
    3. severance payments for upcoming high volume job cuts
    As you may noticed Nortel has to fire 5000 right away now (1800 +3200) but it's just the begining.
    There is no Plan yet for the total number! Wait for the Plan to see better.
    We assume that each 5k job cuts would cost Nortel $500 mill

  • scalpcutter

    You both really are not thinking.
    When Nortel fired for bankruptcy protection they owed 12 billion.
    The total of all their assets is rumoured to be 11 billion.
    By filing for protection their debt is now ZERO yet they are still worth 11 billion. Sounds like they did a smart thing.

  • Got_Out

    Oh, but that it could be that easy. While filing CCAA/Chapt 11 has released them from severance, lease exit costs and other costs associated with restructuring/downsizing, the Debt doesnt go to zero. The Z and team still need to come up with a plan for that debt that will be accepted by the creditors (secured and unsecured). With the assets they have ($11B on the books), no creditor will walk with nothing. They will get it reduced and in some cases they may manage to walk away, but it will be far from zero. The secured creditors will get all of theirs in most cases. Govt agencies will be the real decision maker on the pension underfunds. And of course, how will all of the unsecured creditors (1000's of ex-employees) vote?

    Here's an interesting question – assuming their is a Nortel post the CCAA/Chapt 11, how does everyone feel about having a stake in the “new Nortel”?? Highly likely they will try to turn a lot of the debt into equity in the newco. Will you want to be a stakeholder, given its the same leadership and business?? Joel Hackney as the CEO of a now Enterprise centric “New Nortel”?? Will you have a choice?

    Maybe I should buy some more Cisco stock….

  • 4merEmployee22

    OOOOOOOOps!!!!

    FIRING EMPLOYEES IS MORE COMPLEX!!!! My friend?
    Just imagine? 3,200 employees taking them to court for
    “UNJUST CAUSE” There has to be justified reasons for just
    “FIRING EMPLOYEES”, which is very complicated. If they went on
    strike and don't want to go back to work.. then it's probably logical
    to fire them all!!

    Now? My question is… How do they FIRE an incompetent CEO?

  • scalpcutter

    With all due respect you are wrong, unassuming, naive and gullible to make a statement that “no creditor will walk away with nothing”. I know how this works and you should check out other examples of what creditors end up with in cases like this. Remember the accounting fiasco. Nortel wasn't even in bankruptcy protection. I know many people who were part of the lawsuit. Most received back useless tock as payment ..a percent of what they lost. Others received a paltry cash sum. In other words they were all disappointed and none of them said it was worth it at the end of the day. Now under protection and with more lawyers involved it will be impossible to walk away with “something” unless you are a bank owed money. It won't be worth it for the average creditor. Mark my Words. From what I understand there are No Secured Creditors. If there are they would be the ones owed billions and even they will Receive pennies on the dollar. I don't know why you feel so optimistic about this. You should check out the real world and how things work bud.
    Take it from a guy with experience,.

  • RealityStrikes

    I suspect the Nortel cash position increased (you calculate $144M) simply because, upon entering Ch 11, Nortel has not paid some of its suppliers. But I'm not a financial guy…. the CFO knows the real truth. :)

  • netas

    No. Nortel filed for ch 11 on January 14, 2009. this will have an any effect on 2008-end figures.

    But when you look at the second monitors reports issued on Jan 30, 2009, you see that the cash has declined around by 70 mn. so you are right, when you take into account unpaid liabilities due to bankruptcy protection, 1Q2009 figures will not be a pleasant one.

  • netas

    so the next step will be convincing its creditors and pension holders, and giving them new share in exchange for its liabilities to them. am i right?

    many thanks for the replies.

  • Got_Out

    One of the interesting values in blogs such are this is that everyone has an opinion and no one has to back up their statements, opinions or comments with accountability or fact. Unfortunately, some blogs (such as this one) seem to get clogged with individuals who reduce the value of their posts by allowing emotion to overpower logic and reality. They also seem to be the individuals that spend time attacking others rather than discussing the issues. Rather than sinking to that level or questioning your experience, I'll stay focused on the issue.

    The court is ultimately responsible to ensure the law (Canadian, US, UK in this case) is followed and that the rights/interests of all parties are recognized and protected. The Monitor is assigned to be part of the process as it moves forward.

    Unlike many other cases (where there is significant misalignment of assets and liabilities), on paper, Nortel is relatively close. The driver was not the differential, it was cash. As they have for all this decade, they continue to burn cash to maintain operations (this is an area where Mike and team were able to drive improvement, with a few quarters postive CF). However, the need to do major restructuring (finally recognized) and the major pension underfund liability (probably closer to $3B than $2B) were pieces of the puzzle that did not have a viable answer outside of going the protection route.

    There is still much pain to go for this once big company. I refrain from the expression “great company”, as it rarely has demonstrated consistent and growing profitability since the real hay days – the 1980's. The emotional and financial pain for employees, suppliers and customers who have made financial and personal commitments to Nortel is only beginning. I am not delusion or naive, but the world is also not all dark. Either Nortel goes into bankruptcy (with debtors paid cents on the dollar and a pension fund windup) or it emerges as a smaller more focused (restructured) company with some type of settlement with debtors. In Canada, there are recent examples, such as Air Canada.

    While I am no admirer of Mike Z and his few close associates (Joel, Dennis C), they do understand that like the class action suits, if they dont deal with the debt, they can never get to a new world. Personally, I doubt their ability to build a vision, strategy and execute a new direction, but they are right that they cant move forward as it currently exists. The laws and courts provide both the means and the protection to reset. A lot of people (current employees, ex-employees, suppliers, customers) will pay for the sins of omission and commission committed by a long list of previous leadership.

    Only time will tell, but I am highly confident (based on my corporate, financial and legal experience) that the debt wont go from $12B to zero.

    Have a nice day!

  • yes4aapl

    Wow, Wow!
    Firing Nortel's employees has been an easy job. Nortel has fired 65 000 of them so far with no problems!
    What you R talking about?

  • yes4aapl

    However, the need to do major restructuring (finally recognized) and the major pension underfund liability (probably closer to $3B than $2B) were pieces of the puzzle that did not have a viable answer outside of going the protection route.
    ====
    re
    welcome on board!
    Nice post!
    The blog you posted for has never acknowledged $3 bill in pension deficit!
    It was my estimation 8 months ago.
    btw

    It's not all bad when we talk about Nortel!
    Last Ottawa Citizen article explains that.
    So many good people were grown on Nortel's payroll!
    So many!
    Shareholders would be proud knowing that!
    So many!

  • Got_Out

    Oh, but that it could be that easy. While filing CCAA/Chapt 11 has released them from severance, lease exit costs and other costs associated with restructuring/downsizing, the Debt doesnt go to zero. The Z and team still need to come up with a plan for that debt that will be accepted by the creditors (secured and unsecured). With the assets they have ($11B on the books), no creditor will walk with nothing. They will get it reduced and in some cases they may manage to walk away, but it will be far from zero. The secured creditors will get all of theirs in most cases. Govt agencies will be the real decision maker on the pension underfunds. And of course, how will all of the unsecured creditors (1000's of ex-employees) vote?

    Here's an interesting question – assuming their is a Nortel post the CCAA/Chapt 11, how does everyone feel about having a stake in the “new Nortel”?? Highly likely they will try to turn a lot of the debt into equity in the newco. Will you want to be a stakeholder, given its the same leadership and business?? Joel Hackney as the CEO of a now Enterprise centric “New Nortel”?? Will you have a choice?

    Maybe I should buy some more Cisco stock….

  • 4merEmployee22

    OOOOOOOOps!!!!

    FIRING EMPLOYEES IS MORE COMPLEX!!!! My friend?
    Just imagine? 3,200 employees taking them to court for
    “UNJUST CAUSE” There has to be justified reasons for just
    “FIRING EMPLOYEES”, which is very complicated. If they went on
    strike and don't want to go back to work.. then it's probably logical
    to fire them all!!

    Now? My question is… How do they FIRE an incompetent CEO?

  • scalpcutter

    With all due respect you are wrong, unassuming, naive and gullible to make a statement that “no creditor will walk away with nothing”. I know how this works and you should check out other examples of what creditors end up with in cases like this. Remember the accounting fiasco. Nortel wasn't even in bankruptcy protection. I know many people who were part of the lawsuit. Most received back useless tock as payment ..a percent of what they lost. Others received a paltry cash sum. In other words they were all disappointed and none of them said it was worth it at the end of the day. Now under protection and with more lawyers involved it will be impossible to walk away with “something” unless you are a bank owed money. It won't be worth it for the average creditor. Mark my Words. From what I understand there are No Secured Creditors. If there are they would be the ones owed billions and even they will Receive pennies on the dollar. I don't know why you feel so optimistic about this. You should check out the real world and how things work bud.
    Take it from a guy with experience,.

  • RealityStrikes

    I suspect the Nortel cash position increased (you calculate $144M) simply because, upon entering Ch 11, Nortel has not paid some of its suppliers. But I'm not a financial guy…. the CFO knows the real truth. :)

  • netas

    No. Nortel filed for ch 11 on January 14, 2009. this will have an any effect on 2008-end figures.

    But when you look at the second monitors reports issued on Jan 30, 2009, you see that the cash has declined around by 70 mn. so you are right, when you take into account unpaid liabilities due to bankruptcy protection, 1Q2009 figure (not 2008 end figure) will not be a pleasant one.

  • netas

    so the next step will be convincing its creditors and pension holders, and giving them new share in exchange for its liabilities to them. am i right?

    many thanks for the replies.

  • Got_Out

    One of the interesting values in blogs such are this is that everyone has an opinion and no one has to back up their statements, opinions or comments with accountability or fact. Unfortunately, some blogs (such as this one) seem to get clogged with individuals who reduce the value of their posts by allowing emotion to overpower logic and reality. They also seem to be the individuals that spend time attacking others rather than discussing the issues. Rather than sinking to that level or questioning your experience, I'll stay focused on the issue.

    The court is ultimately responsible to ensure the law (Canadian, US, UK in this case) is followed and that the rights/interests of all parties are recognized and protected. The Monitor is assigned to be part of the process as it moves forward.

    Unlike many other cases (where there is significant misalignment of assets and liabilities), on paper, Nortel is relatively close. The driver was not the differential, it was cash. As they have for all this decade, they continue to burn cash to maintain operations (this is an area where Mike and team were able to drive improvement, with a few quarters postive CF). However, the need to do major restructuring (finally recognized) and the major pension underfund liability (probably closer to $3B than $2B) were pieces of the puzzle that did not have a viable answer outside of going the protection route.

    There is still much pain to go for this once big company. I refrain from the expression “great company”, as it rarely has demonstrated consistent and growing profitability since the real hay days – the 1980's. The emotional and financial pain for employees, suppliers and customers who have made financial and personal commitments to Nortel is only beginning. I am not delusion or naive, but the world is also not all dark. Either Nortel goes into bankruptcy (with debtors paid cents on the dollar and a pension fund windup) or it emerges as a smaller more focused (restructured) company with some type of settlement with debtors. In Canada, there are recent examples, such as Air Canada.

    While I am no admirer of Mike Z and his few close associates (Joel, Dennis C), they do understand that like the class action suits, if they dont deal with the debt, they can never get to a new world. Personally, I doubt their ability to build a vision, strategy and execute a new direction, but they are right that they cant move forward as it currently exists. The laws and courts provide both the means and the protection to reset. A lot of people (current employees, ex-employees, suppliers, customers) will pay for the sins of omission and commission committed by a long list of previous leadership.

    Only time will tell, but I am highly confident (based on my corporate, financial and legal experience) that the debt wont go from $12B to zero.

    Have a nice day!

  • yes4aapl

    Wow, Wow!
    Firing Nortel's employees has been an easy job. Nortel has fired 65 000 of them so far with no problems!
    What you R talking about?

  • yes4aapl

    However, the need to do major restructuring (finally recognized) and the major pension underfund liability (probably closer to $3B than $2B) were pieces of the puzzle that did not have a viable answer outside of going the protection route.
    ====
    re
    welcome on board!
    Nice post!
    The blog you posted for has never acknowledged $3 bill in pension deficit!
    It was my estimation 8 months ago.
    btw

    It's not all bad when we talk about Nortel!
    Last Ottawa Citizen article explains that.
    So many good people were grown on Nortel's payroll!
    So many!
    Shareholders would be proud knowing that!
    So many!

  • TwitterCounter for @markevans
  • Seeking Alpha Certified