<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Irony 101?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/07/08/irony-101/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/07/08/irony-101/</link>
	<description>All the News about Nortel Networks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: resume template</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/07/08/irony-101/comment-page-1/#comment-31810</link>
		<dc:creator>resume template</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/?p=1114#comment-31810</guid>
		<description>this was a very intriguing issue indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this was a very intriguing issue indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: resume template</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/07/08/irony-101/comment-page-1/#comment-26348</link>
		<dc:creator>resume template</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/?p=1114#comment-26348</guid>
		<description>this was a very intriguing issue indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this was a very intriguing issue indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nortel and Deloitte: Strange Managed Services Deal? &#124; MSPmentor</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/07/08/irony-101/comment-page-1/#comment-2321</link>
		<dc:creator>Nortel and Deloitte: Strange Managed Services Deal? &#124; MSPmentor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/?p=1114#comment-2321</guid>
		<description>[...] about Deloitte&#8217;s decision to leverage managed telepresence services from Nortel Networks. Here&#8217;s a look at Mark&#8217;s analysis. I&#8217;m not suggesting there&#8217;s anything shady about the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about Deloitte&#8217;s decision to leverage managed telepresence services from Nortel Networks. Here&#8217;s a look at Mark&#8217;s analysis. I&#8217;m not suggesting there&#8217;s anything shady about the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fmckenna</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/07/08/irony-101/comment-page-1/#comment-5970</link>
		<dc:creator>fmckenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/?p=1114#comment-5970</guid>
		<description>Not so strange.  The Big 4 have few choices for these types of contracts since they would have a hard time maintaining independence while having such a large relationship if they were still their auditors.  What is strange though is that there is still a derivative suit against Deloitte related to their activities with Nortel.  Pending litigation, where your former client is your adversary, should make a business relationship with your former client, even in &quot;normal course&quot; also an independence issue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/72911/000090956708000214/o38996ae10vk.htm#122&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/72911/00...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://seekingalpha.com/article/29596-nortel-deloitte-rang-alarm-bells&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://seekingalpha.com/article/29596-nortel-de...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2002/07/17/nortelsuitd_0207171.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2002/07/17/nortel...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so strange.  The Big 4 have few choices for these types of contracts since they would have a hard time maintaining independence while having such a large relationship if they were still their auditors.  What is strange though is that there is still a derivative suit against Deloitte related to their activities with Nortel.  Pending litigation, where your former client is your adversary, should make a business relationship with your former client, even in &#8220;normal course&#8221; also an independence issue.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/72911/000090956708000214/o38996ae10vk.htm#122" rel="nofollow">http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/72911/00&#8230;</a><br /><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/29596-nortel-deloitte-rang-alarm-bells" rel="nofollow">http://seekingalpha.com/article/29596-nortel-de&#8230;</a><br /><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2002/07/17/nortelsuitd_0207171.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2002/07/17/nortel&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G&#38;F</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/07/08/irony-101/comment-page-1/#comment-5971</link>
		<dc:creator>G&#38;F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/?p=1114#comment-5971</guid>
		<description>Deloitte also made big-time coin feeding on Nortel&#039;s SAP habit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deloitte also made big-time coin feeding on Nortel&#39;s SAP habit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

