<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nortel May Dump Sasken Stake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/04/17/nortel-may-dump-sasken-stake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/04/17/nortel-may-dump-sasken-stake/</link>
	<description>All the News about Nortel Networks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: ex-nortel</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/04/17/nortel-may-dump-sasken-stake/comment-page-1/#comment-31833</link>
		<dc:creator>ex-nortel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/?p=1012#comment-31833</guid>
		<description>Obviously they are going to need the cash generated by the sale of their Sasken share to pay for the 2008 management bonuses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously they are going to need the cash generated by the sale of their Sasken share to pay for the 2008 management bonuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ex-nortel</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/04/17/nortel-may-dump-sasken-stake/comment-page-1/#comment-4275</link>
		<dc:creator>ex-nortel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/?p=1012#comment-4275</guid>
		<description>Obviously they are going to need the cash generated by the sale of their Sasken share to pay for the 2008 management bonuses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously they are going to need the cash generated by the sale of their Sasken share to pay for the 2008 management bonuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Nortel Watcher</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/04/17/nortel-may-dump-sasken-stake/comment-page-1/#comment-4276</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Nortel Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 01:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/?p=1012#comment-4276</guid>
		<description>Flip...flop...flip...flop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flip&#8230;flop&#8230;flip&#8230;flop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: micon</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/04/17/nortel-may-dump-sasken-stake/comment-page-1/#comment-4277</link>
		<dc:creator>micon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/?p=1012#comment-4277</guid>
		<description>BT Reconsiders PBT Plans&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;BT Group plc (NYSE: BT - message board; London: BTA), to date the most committed supporter of Provider Backbone Transport (PBT), is having second thoughts about how widely deployed the controversial Ethernet technology might be in its 21CN next-generation network.  &lt;br&gt;....................&lt;br&gt;If that is the outcome, it would be disappointing news for Nortel, PBT&#039;s chief tub-thumper, and a relief for the trio of MPLS equipment vendors involved in 21CN -- Alcatel-Lucent (NYSE: ALU - message board), Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO - message board), and Juniper Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: JNPR - message board) -- which, to varying degrees, have been campaigning against PBT for the past two years. (See AlcaLu&#039;s Alwan: PBT Will Lose Its Shine , AlcaLu: PBT Is Peripheral, and Vendors Clash Over PBT.) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=151369&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BT Reconsiders PBT Plans</p>
<p>BT Group plc (NYSE: BT &#8211; message board; London: BTA), to date the most committed supporter of Provider Backbone Transport (PBT), is having second thoughts about how widely deployed the controversial Ethernet technology might be in its 21CN next-generation network.  <br />&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..<br />If that is the outcome, it would be disappointing news for Nortel, PBT&#39;s chief tub-thumper, and a relief for the trio of MPLS equipment vendors involved in 21CN &#8212; Alcatel-Lucent (NYSE: ALU &#8211; message board), Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO &#8211; message board), and Juniper Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: JNPR &#8211; message board) &#8212; which, to varying degrees, have been campaigning against PBT for the past two years. (See AlcaLu&#39;s Alwan: PBT Will Lose Its Shine , AlcaLu: PBT Is Peripheral, and Vendors Clash Over PBT.) </p>
<p><a href="http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=151369" rel="nofollow">http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

