<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barron&#8217;s: It&#8217;s a Death Spiral</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/28/barrons-its-a-death-spiral/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/28/barrons-its-a-death-spiral/</link>
	<description>All the News about Nortel Networks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: max191</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/28/barrons-its-a-death-spiral/comment-page-1/#comment-26870</link>
		<dc:creator>max191</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/28/barrons-its-a-death-spiral/#comment-26870</guid>
		<description>It seems that you are maintaining a steady blogging pace. Well done! Looking for more updates from your end. Thanks a lot!&lt;br&gt;regards&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel=&quot;dofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.charcoalgrillsite.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;charcoal grill&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that you are maintaining a steady blogging pace. Well done! Looking for more updates from your end. Thanks a lot!<br />regards<br /><a rel="dofollow" href="http://www.charcoalgrillsite.com" rel="nofollow">charcoal grill</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Aerotek</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/28/barrons-its-a-death-spiral/comment-page-1/#comment-3055</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Aerotek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/28/barrons-its-a-death-spiral/#comment-3055</guid>
		<description>I vaguely recall bygone Nortel brass rattling off  buzzwords like &quot;levering synergies&quot; and  preaching how crucial &quot;time to market&quot; was. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nortel R&amp;D is getting pretty darn small, and I doubt its sending whats left of it off to countries where hamsters in wheels generate electricity  - when they&#039;re not being roasted on sticks - is going to enhance &quot;time to market&quot; in any way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vaguely recall bygone Nortel brass rattling off  buzzwords like &#8220;levering synergies&#8221; and  preaching how crucial &#8220;time to market&#8221; was. </p>
<p>Nortel R&#038;D is getting pretty darn small, and I doubt its sending whats left of it off to countries where hamsters in wheels generate electricity  &#8211; when they&#39;re not being roasted on sticks &#8211; is going to enhance &#8220;time to market&#8221; in any way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/28/barrons-its-a-death-spiral/comment-page-1/#comment-3056</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/28/barrons-its-a-death-spiral/#comment-3056</guid>
		<description>From the time perspective it&#039;s easy to conclude&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nortel restructuring program has not been working, or did not work!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is there any chance Mike can be successful cutting another 2100 and shifting 1000?&lt;br&gt;maybe small chance...&lt;br&gt;Nortel has been bleeding too long!!!&lt;br&gt;Employees have been watching the horror of cuts year after year, CEO after CEO after CEO&lt;br&gt;There used to be 100 000 heads at Nortel in 2000!&lt;br&gt;Today it’s 30k&lt;br&gt;There are good companies with good benefits, am I wrong?&lt;br&gt;Many Nortel employees have found good jobs and started new businesses, as I know.&lt;br&gt;The painful cuts continue!&lt;br&gt;Why the small steps?&lt;br&gt;Do it once and forever.&lt;br&gt;Don’t be afraid of BK words!&lt;br&gt;It is well overdue. 2002 was the best time to do it when NT stock was on its way to zero!&lt;br&gt;AirCanada did it! Planes are still flying&lt;br&gt;Laidlaw did it! Buses are still traveling!&lt;br&gt;Today they are stronger than ever!&lt;br&gt;The way Nortel does restructuring, in next few years you will not find anyone who remembers anything good_positive about that 100 years old company!&lt;br&gt;There are Millions of defrauded shareholders and for what? Just to keep the fat paychecks and bonuses for management?&lt;br&gt;Nortel filed new bonus plan this week /SEC 8k/&lt;br&gt;Bonuses will be paid on margin improvements. Yes, managers will get them no matter what by squeezing employees and selling assets! What shareholders are getting? OH look at the chart!&lt;br&gt;If you knew nothing about Nortel the chart would tell you full story!&lt;br&gt;btw&lt;br&gt;where is my compensation for defrauded shareholders in 2004? $30.50 a share calculation... OK I&#039;ve already given up, I don&#039;t like to be held hostage for years.&lt;br&gt;It is just painful to watch new investors lured into that stock on false Q2 2005 Triple Profits numbers, or on Mike&#039;s false turn around story on Nov 16 2006 conference for the investors&lt;br&gt;It’s been too painful to watch! just my personal opinions, Nortel, please, prove me wrong just once!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the time perspective it&#39;s easy to conclude</p>
<p>Nortel restructuring program has not been working, or did not work!</p>
<p>Is there any chance Mike can be successful cutting another 2100 and shifting 1000?<br />maybe small chance&#8230;<br />Nortel has been bleeding too long!!!<br />Employees have been watching the horror of cuts year after year, CEO after CEO after CEO<br />There used to be 100 000 heads at Nortel in 2000!<br />Today it’s 30k<br />There are good companies with good benefits, am I wrong?<br />Many Nortel employees have found good jobs and started new businesses, as I know.<br />The painful cuts continue!<br />Why the small steps?<br />Do it once and forever.<br />Don’t be afraid of BK words!<br />It is well overdue. 2002 was the best time to do it when NT stock was on its way to zero!<br />AirCanada did it! Planes are still flying<br />Laidlaw did it! Buses are still traveling!<br />Today they are stronger than ever!<br />The way Nortel does restructuring, in next few years you will not find anyone who remembers anything good_positive about that 100 years old company!<br />There are Millions of defrauded shareholders and for what? Just to keep the fat paychecks and bonuses for management?<br />Nortel filed new bonus plan this week /SEC 8k/<br />Bonuses will be paid on margin improvements. Yes, managers will get them no matter what by squeezing employees and selling assets! What shareholders are getting? OH look at the chart!<br />If you knew nothing about Nortel the chart would tell you full story!<br />btw<br />where is my compensation for defrauded shareholders in 2004? $30.50 a share calculation&#8230; OK I&#39;ve already given up, I don&#39;t like to be held hostage for years.<br />It is just painful to watch new investors lured into that stock on false Q2 2005 Triple Profits numbers, or on Mike&#39;s false turn around story on Nov 16 2006 conference for the investors<br />It’s been too painful to watch! just my personal opinions, Nortel, please, prove me wrong just once!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Close Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/28/barrons-its-a-death-spiral/comment-page-1/#comment-3059</link>
		<dc:creator>A Close Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/28/barrons-its-a-death-spiral/#comment-3059</guid>
		<description>Observer,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I enjoy reading your comments, but you may have missed the point this time.  high risk technology companies aren&#039;t carriers only other options.  They could easily choose to buy 4G LTE from established 3G market players like Ericsson, NSN or ALU.  These would be very low-risk options.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, while you&#039;re correct that all telecom equipment manufacturers stock prices have suffered recently, only NT&#039;s ability to survive in its current form is being called into question.  That Ericsson, NSN and ALU will survive is a foregone conclusion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nortel will not survive in its current form.  It doesn&#039;t have the revenue or balance sheet to effectively invest in all of its markets in a way that could vault it into leadership positions.  It&#039;s spread too thin.  It needs to select just a coupled of markets where it has the ability to invest in R&amp;D to be #1 or #2.  If it doesn&#039;t do this, customers will begin to avoid it further, accelerating its death spiral.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;NT also doesn&#039;t have the balance sheet to acquire anything of consequence.  Given it&#039;s current market cap, if credit markets were less constrained, it could be an easy target to buy and break up.  In fact, I was thinking of skipping my Starbucks for a few days, and buying NT myself.  I could probably make a quick profit by auctioning off the rights among NT employees to terminate Hackney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Observer,</p>
<p>I enjoy reading your comments, but you may have missed the point this time.  high risk technology companies aren&#39;t carriers only other options.  They could easily choose to buy 4G LTE from established 3G market players like Ericsson, NSN or ALU.  These would be very low-risk options.</p>
<p>Also, while you&#39;re correct that all telecom equipment manufacturers stock prices have suffered recently, only NT&#39;s ability to survive in its current form is being called into question.  That Ericsson, NSN and ALU will survive is a foregone conclusion.</p>
<p>Nortel will not survive in its current form.  It doesn&#39;t have the revenue or balance sheet to effectively invest in all of its markets in a way that could vault it into leadership positions.  It&#39;s spread too thin.  It needs to select just a coupled of markets where it has the ability to invest in R&#038;D to be #1 or #2.  If it doesn&#39;t do this, customers will begin to avoid it further, accelerating its death spiral.</p>
<p>NT also doesn&#39;t have the balance sheet to acquire anything of consequence.  Given it&#39;s current market cap, if credit markets were less constrained, it could be an easy target to buy and break up.  In fact, I was thinking of skipping my Starbucks for a few days, and buying NT myself.  I could probably make a quick profit by auctioning off the rights among NT employees to terminate Hackney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Nortel Watcher</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/28/barrons-its-a-death-spiral/comment-page-1/#comment-3057</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Nortel Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/28/barrons-its-a-death-spiral/#comment-3057</guid>
		<description>No, no, no, no.  This is not an industry problem.  Do not cut Nortel (or ALU or MOT) any slack.  The industry is doing just fine.  Nokia&#039;s stock has almost doubled in the past year.  Research in Motion has maintained a strong positive trend as well.  Same for the wireless business of Samsung and LG.  The companies that adapt and innovate are doing just fine.  The telecom companies that are run by former GE and Home Depot executives don&#039;t have a clue what&#039;s going on and are on the rocks.  And let&#039;s not point the spotlight solely on MZ.  Pat Russo at ALU is in just as much trouble.  She may have architected a cool merger, but her company shares the same problem as Nortel and Moto - NO vision.  The customer base isn&#039;t going to wait.  The Europeans, Koreans, and Chinese will fill the void in a blink.  I think it&#039;s already too late. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The most painful part of this whole debacle is that it has been so predictable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, no, no, no.  This is not an industry problem.  Do not cut Nortel (or ALU or MOT) any slack.  The industry is doing just fine.  Nokia&#39;s stock has almost doubled in the past year.  Research in Motion has maintained a strong positive trend as well.  Same for the wireless business of Samsung and LG.  The companies that adapt and innovate are doing just fine.  The telecom companies that are run by former GE and Home Depot executives don&#39;t have a clue what&#39;s going on and are on the rocks.  And let&#39;s not point the spotlight solely on MZ.  Pat Russo at ALU is in just as much trouble.  She may have architected a cool merger, but her company shares the same problem as Nortel and Moto &#8211; NO vision.  The customer base isn&#39;t going to wait.  The Europeans, Koreans, and Chinese will fill the void in a blink.  I think it&#39;s already too late. </p>
<p>The most painful part of this whole debacle is that it has been so predictable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/28/barrons-its-a-death-spiral/comment-page-1/#comment-3058</link>
		<dc:creator>Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/28/barrons-its-a-death-spiral/#comment-3058</guid>
		<description>We can all agree that the economy is slowing down and carriers are pulling back spending. Now would a wireless carrier take a chance on some high risk new technology during a slowdown or would rely on something they know would bring in revenue until the down cycle turned ? Would Barron&#039;s care to name a telecom equipment stock that hasn&#039;t dropped to a fresh low this year ?  My prediction is consumers pull back spending dramatically and quit using as much data services on their cell phones and even move to cheaper, stripped down service plans, making it less likely that carriers install new equipment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can all agree that the economy is slowing down and carriers are pulling back spending. Now would a wireless carrier take a chance on some high risk new technology during a slowdown or would rely on something they know would bring in revenue until the down cycle turned ? Would Barron&#39;s care to name a telecom equipment stock that hasn&#39;t dropped to a fresh low this year ?  My prediction is consumers pull back spending dramatically and quit using as much data services on their cell phones and even move to cheaper, stripped down service plans, making it less likely that carriers install new equipment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: youngguns76</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/28/barrons-its-a-death-spiral/comment-page-1/#comment-3060</link>
		<dc:creator>youngguns76</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/28/barrons-its-a-death-spiral/#comment-3060</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s obvious most analysts are expecting a slow down in the economy.  Should anyone be surprised by the downgrade?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s obvious most analysts are expecting a slow down in the economy.  Should anyone be surprised by the downgrade?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

