<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nortel Talking to Siemens?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/15/nortel-talking-to-siemens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/15/nortel-talking-to-siemens/</link>
	<description>All the News about Nortel Networks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:59:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Onlooker</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/15/nortel-talking-to-siemens/comment-page-1/#comment-30779</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlooker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/15/nortel-talking-to-siemens/#comment-30779</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2008/02/19/when-cash-isnt-really-cash/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2008/02/19/when-cash...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2008/02/19/when-cash-isnt-really-cash/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2008/02/19/when-cash.." rel="nofollow">http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2008/02/19/when-cash..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlooker</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/15/nortel-talking-to-siemens/comment-page-1/#comment-30778</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlooker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/15/nortel-talking-to-siemens/#comment-30778</guid>
		<description>Check this out from the WSJ...A blurb about Nortel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;February 19, 2008, 1:32 pm&lt;br&gt;From Texas Instruments to Motorola: When Cash Isn’t Really Cash&lt;br&gt;Posted by Heidi Moore&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Deal Journal saw “Macbeth” this weekend and, somehow, when the three witches chanted “what’s fair is foul and what’s foul is fair,” it was easy to see parallels to the upside-down world of the credit crunch, where nothing is what it seems anymore. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thus, we weren’t entirely surprised when we saw the latest tocsin that something wicked may this way come: in this case, a Merrill Lynch report on how technology companies that look secure because of the cash on their balance sheets may actually be depending on some debt securities that they may have to write down later.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;According to the investment bank’s technology team, the companies with the most exposure include Foundry Networks, Texas Instruments and Photon Dynamics, who respectively have have 68%, 62%, and 54% of the “cash” portion of their balance sheets tied up in now-risky debt such as auction-rate securities and asset backed- and mortgage-rate securities. Those debt instruments looked like “cash equivalents” as recently as last year. Now: not so much. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other big names may be at danger because tomorrow (and tomorrow, and tomorrow) they still will be drawing a big chunk of their income from the interest on those securities. Alcatel-Lucent, IDT, Nortel and Motorola all draw more than half of their pretax income from the interest-payments on that debt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check this out from the WSJ&#8230;A blurb about Nortel</p>
<p>February 19, 2008, 1:32 pm<br />From Texas Instruments to Motorola: When Cash Isn’t Really Cash<br />Posted by Heidi Moore</p>
<p>Deal Journal saw “Macbeth” this weekend and, somehow, when the three witches chanted “what’s fair is foul and what’s foul is fair,” it was easy to see parallels to the upside-down world of the credit crunch, where nothing is what it seems anymore. </p>
<p>Thus, we weren’t entirely surprised when we saw the latest tocsin that something wicked may this way come: in this case, a Merrill Lynch report on how technology companies that look secure because of the cash on their balance sheets may actually be depending on some debt securities that they may have to write down later.</p>
<p>According to the investment bank’s technology team, the companies with the most exposure include Foundry Networks, Texas Instruments and Photon Dynamics, who respectively have have 68%, 62%, and 54% of the “cash” portion of their balance sheets tied up in now-risky debt such as auction-rate securities and asset backed- and mortgage-rate securities. Those debt instruments looked like “cash equivalents” as recently as last year. Now: not so much. </p>
<p>Other big names may be at danger because tomorrow (and tomorrow, and tomorrow) they still will be drawing a big chunk of their income from the interest on those securities. Alcatel-Lucent, IDT, Nortel and Motorola all draw more than half of their pretax income from the interest-payments on that debt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlooker</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/15/nortel-talking-to-siemens/comment-page-1/#comment-4117</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlooker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/15/nortel-talking-to-siemens/#comment-4117</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2008/02/19/when-cash-isnt-really-cash/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2008/02/19/when-cash...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2008/02/19/when-cash-isnt-really-cash/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2008/02/19/when-cash.." rel="nofollow">http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2008/02/19/when-cash..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlooker</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/15/nortel-talking-to-siemens/comment-page-1/#comment-4116</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlooker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/15/nortel-talking-to-siemens/#comment-4116</guid>
		<description>Check this out from the WSJ...A blurb about Nortel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;February 19, 2008, 1:32 pm&lt;br&gt;From Texas Instruments to Motorola: When Cash Isn’t Really Cash&lt;br&gt;Posted by Heidi Moore&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Deal Journal saw “Macbeth” this weekend and, somehow, when the three witches chanted “what’s fair is foul and what’s foul is fair,” it was easy to see parallels to the upside-down world of the credit crunch, where nothing is what it seems anymore. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thus, we weren’t entirely surprised when we saw the latest tocsin that something wicked may this way come: in this case, a Merrill Lynch report on how technology companies that look secure because of the cash on their balance sheets may actually be depending on some debt securities that they may have to write down later.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;According to the investment bank’s technology team, the companies with the most exposure include Foundry Networks, Texas Instruments and Photon Dynamics, who respectively have have 68%, 62%, and 54% of the “cash” portion of their balance sheets tied up in now-risky debt such as auction-rate securities and asset backed- and mortgage-rate securities. Those debt instruments looked like “cash equivalents” as recently as last year. Now: not so much. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other big names may be at danger because tomorrow (and tomorrow, and tomorrow) they still will be drawing a big chunk of their income from the interest on those securities. Alcatel-Lucent, IDT, Nortel and Motorola all draw more than half of their pretax income from the interest-payments on that debt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check this out from the WSJ&#8230;A blurb about Nortel</p>
<p>February 19, 2008, 1:32 pm<br />From Texas Instruments to Motorola: When Cash Isn’t Really Cash<br />Posted by Heidi Moore</p>
<p>Deal Journal saw “Macbeth” this weekend and, somehow, when the three witches chanted “what’s fair is foul and what’s foul is fair,” it was easy to see parallels to the upside-down world of the credit crunch, where nothing is what it seems anymore. </p>
<p>Thus, we weren’t entirely surprised when we saw the latest tocsin that something wicked may this way come: in this case, a Merrill Lynch report on how technology companies that look secure because of the cash on their balance sheets may actually be depending on some debt securities that they may have to write down later.</p>
<p>According to the investment bank’s technology team, the companies with the most exposure include Foundry Networks, Texas Instruments and Photon Dynamics, who respectively have have 68%, 62%, and 54% of the “cash” portion of their balance sheets tied up in now-risky debt such as auction-rate securities and asset backed- and mortgage-rate securities. Those debt instruments looked like “cash equivalents” as recently as last year. Now: not so much. </p>
<p>Other big names may be at danger because tomorrow (and tomorrow, and tomorrow) they still will be drawing a big chunk of their income from the interest on those securities. Alcatel-Lucent, IDT, Nortel and Motorola all draw more than half of their pretax income from the interest-payments on that debt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saco</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/15/nortel-talking-to-siemens/comment-page-1/#comment-4135</link>
		<dc:creator>Saco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/15/nortel-talking-to-siemens/#comment-4135</guid>
		<description>Realist, I believe the ratio 1:5 is good and even pessimist as soon as you don&#039;t stay near the coast (ie city such as Shenzhen, Shanghai, etc). If Nokia, Siemens and other have now their manufacturing premise far from the coast, it&#039;s not an accident... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;... but true that NN use to select the 1:2 area :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Realist, I believe the ratio 1:5 is good and even pessimist as soon as you don&#39;t stay near the coast (ie city such as Shenzhen, Shanghai, etc). If Nokia, Siemens and other have now their manufacturing premise far from the coast, it&#39;s not an accident&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8230; but true that NN use to select the 1:2 area <img src='http://www.allaboutnortel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaoNiMa</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/15/nortel-talking-to-siemens/comment-page-1/#comment-4118</link>
		<dc:creator>CaoNiMa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/15/nortel-talking-to-siemens/#comment-4118</guid>
		<description>With respect to cost two chinese engineers are the same as one in North America? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is just an account trick on which Nortel has many experiences...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With respect to cost two chinese engineers are the same as one in North America? </p>
<p>This is just an account trick on which Nortel has many experiences&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timmy</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/15/nortel-talking-to-siemens/comment-page-1/#comment-4119</link>
		<dc:creator>timmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/15/nortel-talking-to-siemens/#comment-4119</guid>
		<description>OMG. The number of &quot;personal copies&quot; of simulation code I saw walking out the front door at Nortel? Incredible. Out of political correctness I won&#039;t state a specific ethnic group, but it&#039;s not like everyone knows. Same thing another company I knew. It&#039;s cultural. Corporate and ethnic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is a level of theft that would earn prison terms in any other business context. Telecom is a looking glass world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG. The number of &#8220;personal copies&#8221; of simulation code I saw walking out the front door at Nortel? Incredible. Out of political correctness I won&#39;t state a specific ethnic group, but it&#39;s not like everyone knows. Same thing another company I knew. It&#39;s cultural. Corporate and ethnic.</p>
<p>This is a level of theft that would earn prison terms in any other business context. Telecom is a looking glass world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Realist</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/15/nortel-talking-to-siemens/comment-page-1/#comment-4134</link>
		<dc:creator>Realist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/15/nortel-talking-to-siemens/#comment-4134</guid>
		<description>Your numbers are wrong Laos.&lt;br&gt;With respect to cost two chinese engineers are the same as one in North America&lt;br&gt;and that gap is closing steadily. I think today it is even less than 2:1.&lt;br&gt;And what do you get from those two engineers working in China?&lt;br&gt;Here is what you get..&lt;br&gt;The reality that they will bolt the minute they get more money, usually going&lt;br&gt;to WahWay where they can hand over technology they stole from the place&lt;br&gt;they just left.&lt;br&gt;As I said today it really isn&#039;t saving big tech companies to do business in China&lt;br&gt;with all the negatives assoiciated with doing business over there.&lt;br&gt;The big execs will learn...sooner than later...pity is they are too dumb and greedy&lt;br&gt;to have any foresight or they wouldn&#039;t have made the mistakes they have made&lt;br&gt;and continue to make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your numbers are wrong Laos.<br />With respect to cost two chinese engineers are the same as one in North America<br />and that gap is closing steadily. I think today it is even less than 2:1.<br />And what do you get from those two engineers working in China?<br />Here is what you get..<br />The reality that they will bolt the minute they get more money, usually going<br />to WahWay where they can hand over technology they stole from the place<br />they just left.<br />As I said today it really isn&#39;t saving big tech companies to do business in China<br />with all the negatives assoiciated with doing business over there.<br />The big execs will learn&#8230;sooner than later&#8230;pity is they are too dumb and greedy<br />to have any foresight or they wouldn&#39;t have made the mistakes they have made<br />and continue to make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: many</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/15/nortel-talking-to-siemens/comment-page-1/#comment-4142</link>
		<dc:creator>many</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/15/nortel-talking-to-siemens/#comment-4142</guid>
		<description>NW, Have you read &quot;who moved my soap&quot;? I particularly like the chapter &quot;bringing six-sigma to sing sing&quot; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NW, Have you read &#8220;who moved my soap&#8221;? I particularly like the chapter &#8220;bringing six-sigma to sing sing&#8221; <img src='http://www.allaboutnortel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name *nortel watcher</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/15/nortel-talking-to-siemens/comment-page-1/#comment-4141</link>
		<dc:creator>Name *nortel watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/02/15/nortel-talking-to-siemens/#comment-4141</guid>
		<description>Obviously a fan of  &quot;Our Iceberg is Melting&quot; Since the &quot;Hackmen&quot; keep throwing the &quot;Fred&#039;s&quot; off the boat before they can tell the paying customers the truth......the iceberg will indeed break apart and be sold for penny stock ........afterall...... most of the quarterly sellers have already cashed in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously a fan of  &#8220;Our Iceberg is Melting&#8221; Since the &#8220;Hackmen&#8221; keep throwing the &#8220;Fred&#39;s&#8221; off the boat before they can tell the paying customers the truth&#8230;&#8230;the iceberg will indeed break apart and be sold for penny stock &#8230;&#8230;..afterall&#8230;&#8230; most of the quarterly sellers have already cashed in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
