<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zafirovski Bullish</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2007/05/03/zafirovski-bullish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2007/05/03/zafirovski-bullish/</link>
	<description>All the News about Nortel Networks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Last Hurrah</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2007/05/03/zafirovski-bullish/comment-page-1/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>Last Hurrah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 14:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutnortel.com/2007/05/03/zafirovski-bullish/#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think we&#039;ll know until 2009 whether this management team is effective or not. Remember the &quot;business transformation&quot; (i.e cost cutting) is to continue until the end of 2009. The numbers make look better but if peers grow faster then you will know Nortel is not winning its fair share of new business.

Anyway, it doesn&#039;t seem to matter at this point how Nortel does as long as they muddle along. They have the Canadian government in their back pocket just like Bell Canada because too many pension funds in Canada own the stock of both companies. The Canadian government will be forced to throw good money after bad. Ah the wonders of a fiat currency !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ll know until 2009 whether this management team is effective or not. Remember the &#8220;business transformation&#8221; (i.e cost cutting) is to continue until the end of 2009. The numbers make look better but if peers grow faster then you will know Nortel is not winning its fair share of new business.</p>
<p>Anyway, it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter at this point how Nortel does as long as they muddle along. They have the Canadian government in their back pocket just like Bell Canada because too many pension funds in Canada own the stock of both companies. The Canadian government will be forced to throw good money after bad. Ah the wonders of a fiat currency !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cool Living</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2007/05/03/zafirovski-bullish/comment-page-1/#comment-1360</link>
		<dc:creator>Cool Living</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 02:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutnortel.com/2007/05/03/zafirovski-bullish/#comment-1360</guid>
		<description>Shareholder value will be the final judge of MZ&#039;s comments on the future.  The stock&#039;s 52-wk high is still 10% below the $35 reached about 6 - 8 weeks after MZ came on board and has see-sawed ever since.

I&#039;ll give MZ and his mgmt team with above-market salaries another 4 quarters but that will be it for my 10K shares...I would rather take the loss then and reinvest than keep buying into their hype.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shareholder value will be the final judge of MZ&#8217;s comments on the future.  The stock&#8217;s 52-wk high is still 10% below the $35 reached about 6 &#8211; 8 weeks after MZ came on board and has see-sawed ever since.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll give MZ and his mgmt team with above-market salaries another 4 quarters but that will be it for my 10K shares&#8230;I would rather take the loss then and reinvest than keep buying into their hype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: many</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2007/05/03/zafirovski-bullish/comment-page-1/#comment-1362</link>
		<dc:creator>many</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 15:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutnortel.com/2007/05/03/zafirovski-bullish/#comment-1362</guid>
		<description>I seem to recall this is a reoccurring theme with Nortel. Good (better than believable) Q1 results followed by restatement, chaos, and embarrassment in the CFOs office.

I think I will withhold judgment until NT reports significantly improved earnings quarter over quarter for five quarters running. (without restatement)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seem to recall this is a reoccurring theme with Nortel. Good (better than believable) Q1 results followed by restatement, chaos, and embarrassment in the CFOs office.</p>
<p>I think I will withhold judgment until NT reports significantly improved earnings quarter over quarter for five quarters running. (without restatement)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Limping-a-Long</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2007/05/03/zafirovski-bullish/comment-page-1/#comment-1363</link>
		<dc:creator>Limping-a-Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 11:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutnortel.com/2007/05/03/zafirovski-bullish/#comment-1363</guid>
		<description>Why should we continue paying top dollar for top talent when top results are not being realized?

To ensure Nortel remains on the offense, to demonstrate his personal belief and committment to increasing stockholder value, and in the true spirit of actual Pay for Performance, I propose that Mike Zâ€™s compensation should be directly proportional to the actual daily return realized by the retail investor.

May I suggest Mike Zâ€™s total yearly salary and compensation should be prorated to equal the number of trading days in a year, and that he should be paid daily in retail Nortel stock. If the stock goes up, he will do well. If it tanks, he will feel the same pain as the rest of us.

Come on Mike Z!  Show us your committment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should we continue paying top dollar for top talent when top results are not being realized?</p>
<p>To ensure Nortel remains on the offense, to demonstrate his personal belief and committment to increasing stockholder value, and in the true spirit of actual Pay for Performance, I propose that Mike Zâ€™s compensation should be directly proportional to the actual daily return realized by the retail investor.</p>
<p>May I suggest Mike Zâ€™s total yearly salary and compensation should be prorated to equal the number of trading days in a year, and that he should be paid daily in retail Nortel stock. If the stock goes up, he will do well. If it tanks, he will feel the same pain as the rest of us.</p>
<p>Come on Mike Z!  Show us your committment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duh!</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2007/05/03/zafirovski-bullish/comment-page-1/#comment-1365</link>
		<dc:creator>duh!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 17:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutnortel.com/2007/05/03/zafirovski-bullish/#comment-1365</guid>
		<description>Did you expect him to sit up there and say Nortel was going to tank???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you expect him to sit up there and say Nortel was going to tank???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One man's opinion</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2007/05/03/zafirovski-bullish/comment-page-1/#comment-1364</link>
		<dc:creator>One man's opinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 15:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutnortel.com/2007/05/03/zafirovski-bullish/#comment-1364</guid>
		<description>Mike Z. is doing a great job!

I had a customer visit both Cisco and Nortel for an upcoming project and they came back with the following: Cisco was very slick with lots of cool things. Nortel was more Engineering focused however also had very cool stuff. The customer said we need to advertise and promote the fact that we are doing the same stuff Cico claims they are only capable of. Sales and Marketing needs to step up and take it to the next level, then and only then will Nortel return to greatness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Z. is doing a great job!</p>
<p>I had a customer visit both Cisco and Nortel for an upcoming project and they came back with the following: Cisco was very slick with lots of cool things. Nortel was more Engineering focused however also had very cool stuff. The customer said we need to advertise and promote the fact that we are doing the same stuff Cico claims they are only capable of. Sales and Marketing needs to step up and take it to the next level, then and only then will Nortel return to greatness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

