<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So Why Did Sprint Overlook Nortel?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2007/01/09/so-why-did-sprint-overlook-nortel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2007/01/09/so-why-did-sprint-overlook-nortel/</link>
	<description>All the News about Nortel Networks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: plut</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2007/01/09/so-why-did-sprint-overlook-nortel/comment-page-1/#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>plut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutnortel.com/?p=419#comment-691</guid>
		<description>This article has some interesting points of view on the subject:

http://www.wimaxtrends.com/Articles/0701.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article has some interesting points of view on the subject:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wimaxtrends.com/Articles/0701.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.wimaxtrends.com/Articles/0701.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The psychiatrist</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2007/01/09/so-why-did-sprint-overlook-nortel/comment-page-1/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>The psychiatrist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutnortel.com/?p=419#comment-692</guid>
		<description>Sprint has already declared that at some point they will use Nortel for their CDMA part of their WiMax buildout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sprint has already declared that at some point they will use Nortel for their CDMA part of their WiMax buildout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darwin</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2007/01/09/so-why-did-sprint-overlook-nortel/comment-page-1/#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>darwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutnortel.com/?p=419#comment-690</guid>
		<description>frankly, it&#039;s all about Sprint hedging its bets.  They are already very dependent upon Nortel for the CDMA network.  They have a natural need to diversify their supply base.

Plus, I understand that Sprint has had a fair amount of financing from their WiMAX vendors.  Nortel is obviously not in a position to contribute, except possibly with EDC.  I could use some enlightening on the subject...

The Sprint strategy seems to be to have a plan to use spectrum that would otherwise be reclaimed by the FCC, using a possibly next gen technology (wimax), with vendor financing.  Looks like a reasonably cheap call option on the future.

If it works out, Sprint looks prescient, and steals a march on VZ and T.  Otherwise, they don&#039;t lose very much

In the meantime, Nortel maintains the power of the incumbency on the CDMA network, and doubtlessly proposes an upgrade path for CDMA that includes all the benefits of the brand new WiMAX network, but as an evolution instead of a forklift upgrade.  I am not sure that in the 5-10 year horizon, Nortel has lost anything here.

And because Nortel is close to Sprint, and if they come up with a workable product, then they can get back into Sprint WiMAX at a later date.

Tactically it is a bummer for Nortel to have lost this first round.  Strategically, it&#039;s not so bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>frankly, it&#8217;s all about Sprint hedging its bets.  They are already very dependent upon Nortel for the CDMA network.  They have a natural need to diversify their supply base.</p>
<p>Plus, I understand that Sprint has had a fair amount of financing from their WiMAX vendors.  Nortel is obviously not in a position to contribute, except possibly with EDC.  I could use some enlightening on the subject&#8230;</p>
<p>The Sprint strategy seems to be to have a plan to use spectrum that would otherwise be reclaimed by the FCC, using a possibly next gen technology (wimax), with vendor financing.  Looks like a reasonably cheap call option on the future.</p>
<p>If it works out, Sprint looks prescient, and steals a march on VZ and T.  Otherwise, they don&#8217;t lose very much</p>
<p>In the meantime, Nortel maintains the power of the incumbency on the CDMA network, and doubtlessly proposes an upgrade path for CDMA that includes all the benefits of the brand new WiMAX network, but as an evolution instead of a forklift upgrade.  I am not sure that in the 5-10 year horizon, Nortel has lost anything here.</p>
<p>And because Nortel is close to Sprint, and if they come up with a workable product, then they can get back into Sprint WiMAX at a later date.</p>
<p>Tactically it is a bummer for Nortel to have lost this first round.  Strategically, it&#8217;s not so bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lakvaol</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2007/01/09/so-why-did-sprint-overlook-nortel/comment-page-1/#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>Lakvaol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutnortel.com/?p=419#comment-689</guid>
		<description>Some comments:

- it is just speculation so far on why Nokia was picked.  There are plenty of rumors that do not involve handsets.  Do not underestimate these rumors.  The Pres of WIMAX at Sprint is an unpredictable character for one thing.
- will Sprint be able to implement WIMAX while it is doing a &quot;disastrous&quot; job in its current businesses?  The Sprint exec suite is experiencing changes.  Will the current plan of being in the Consumer Electronics arena with WIMAX work?  Will Wall Street finance this plan?  Some real issues to ponder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some comments:</p>
<p>- it is just speculation so far on why Nokia was picked.  There are plenty of rumors that do not involve handsets.  Do not underestimate these rumors.  The Pres of WIMAX at Sprint is an unpredictable character for one thing.<br />
- will Sprint be able to implement WIMAX while it is doing a &#8220;disastrous&#8221; job in its current businesses?  The Sprint exec suite is experiencing changes.  Will the current plan of being in the Consumer Electronics arena with WIMAX work?  Will Wall Street finance this plan?  Some real issues to ponder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SC</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2007/01/09/so-why-did-sprint-overlook-nortel/comment-page-1/#comment-693</link>
		<dc:creator>SC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutnortel.com/?p=419#comment-693</guid>
		<description>Interesting that Nortel has a joint venture with LG which should presumably be able to spit out handsets.  I wonder if that really has as much to do with things as people make out of it.
Sprint also has done strange thing in the past with this sort of contract, changed them at the last minute, not followed through on them.

Ultimately though, if WiMax does become a big selling technology there is always room for the networks to change their minds on who&#039;s hardware/software they want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that Nortel has a joint venture with LG which should presumably be able to spit out handsets.  I wonder if that really has as much to do with things as people make out of it.<br />
Sprint also has done strange thing in the past with this sort of contract, changed them at the last minute, not followed through on them.</p>
<p>Ultimately though, if WiMax does become a big selling technology there is always room for the networks to change their minds on who&#8217;s hardware/software they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

