<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nortel Still Canada&#8217;s R&amp;D King</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2006/10/18/nortel-still-canadas-rd-king/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2006/10/18/nortel-still-canadas-rd-king/</link>
	<description>All the News about Nortel Networks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2006/10/18/nortel-still-canadas-rd-king/comment-page-1/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutnortel.com/?p=326#comment-470</guid>
		<description>They boasted cutting R&amp;D for so long then R&amp;D spending was left intact. Why? I wonder why the change of heart.

Another contradiction was their failing to provide a long awaited plan(right after promising one &quot;next week&quot; a while ago). Instead a plan will be made up as they go along they said, on the fly, shooting from the hip, directionless.

Also, how can they assess injecting funds into R&amp;D with evidently weak financial controls given their recent dramatic revisions (worse by the week, doubling intial estimates).

Perhaps the change of heart to maintain a high budget R&amp;D it is all part and parcell of the ongoing theatrics to look like they are doing something /anything, in desperation, directionless  as they sell all assets to the point of selling business while maintaining a huge inefficient non-profit hobby white elephant R&amp;D. How long can they keep printing Nortel paper to pay for all of this is beyond me. Closing loopholes in bond applications requiring pensions be listed now doesn&#039;t help either.

Now what? WiMax /IPTV / assimilting Voice into others server software in areas others control, dominate, or that will accompany no substantial returns as they learn lessons directionless?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They boasted cutting R&amp;D for so long then R&amp;D spending was left intact. Why? I wonder why the change of heart.</p>
<p>Another contradiction was their failing to provide a long awaited plan(right after promising one &#8220;next week&#8221; a while ago). Instead a plan will be made up as they go along they said, on the fly, shooting from the hip, directionless.</p>
<p>Also, how can they assess injecting funds into R&amp;D with evidently weak financial controls given their recent dramatic revisions (worse by the week, doubling intial estimates).</p>
<p>Perhaps the change of heart to maintain a high budget R&amp;D it is all part and parcell of the ongoing theatrics to look like they are doing something /anything, in desperation, directionless  as they sell all assets to the point of selling business while maintaining a huge inefficient non-profit hobby white elephant R&amp;D. How long can they keep printing Nortel paper to pay for all of this is beyond me. Closing loopholes in bond applications requiring pensions be listed now doesn&#8217;t help either.</p>
<p>Now what? WiMax /IPTV / assimilting Voice into others server software in areas others control, dominate, or that will accompany no substantial returns as they learn lessons directionless?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

