<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zafirovski Speaks!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2006/09/19/zafirovski-speaks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2006/09/19/zafirovski-speaks/</link>
	<description>All the News about Nortel Networks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanley's psychiatrist</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2006/09/19/zafirovski-speaks/comment-page-1/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanley's psychiatrist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 07:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutnortel.com/?p=304#comment-375</guid>
		<description>Telecom isnâ€™t facing â€œleadership challengesâ€ and it isnâ€™t even about leadership or telecom for that matter. It is about Nortel with their major challenges.



Stanley- if telecom isn&#039;t facing leadership challenges,then why has Alcatel decided to merge with Lucent  and why has Nokia joined hands with Siemens
knowing full well that mergers require extensive,expensive overhauls of their operations?

did they do that just for the fun of it?

of coarse not, look around you telecom is an ever competitive market,and needs all the cost savings advantages possible, hence the risky merger undertakings with some of the biggest names in the game.



the psychiatrist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Telecom isnâ€™t facing â€œleadership challengesâ€ and it isnâ€™t even about leadership or telecom for that matter. It is about Nortel with their major challenges.</p>
<p>Stanley- if telecom isn&#8217;t facing leadership challenges,then why has Alcatel decided to merge with Lucent  and why has Nokia joined hands with Siemens<br />
knowing full well that mergers require extensive,expensive overhauls of their operations?</p>
<p>did they do that just for the fun of it?</p>
<p>of coarse not, look around you telecom is an ever competitive market,and needs all the cost savings advantages possible, hence the risky merger undertakings with some of the biggest names in the game.</p>
<p>the psychiatrist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanley</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2006/09/19/zafirovski-speaks/comment-page-1/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutnortel.com/?p=304#comment-374</guid>
		<description>Does the rhetoric or misleading ever cease?

Telecom isn&#039;t facing &quot;leadership challenges&quot; and it isn&#039;t even about leadership or telecom for that matter. It is about Nortel with their major challenges.

The Asians are doing terrific, Cisco just bought Scientific Atlanta, Alcatel bought Lucent, so where does he see the challenges outside of Nortel? Slowed at worst, everyone else is holding their own, Nortel is not.

What in the world is he talking about? Does anything ever change there? Understatement is an understatement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the rhetoric or misleading ever cease?</p>
<p>Telecom isn&#8217;t facing &#8220;leadership challenges&#8221; and it isn&#8217;t even about leadership or telecom for that matter. It is about Nortel with their major challenges.</p>
<p>The Asians are doing terrific, Cisco just bought Scientific Atlanta, Alcatel bought Lucent, so where does he see the challenges outside of Nortel? Slowed at worst, everyone else is holding their own, Nortel is not.</p>
<p>What in the world is he talking about? Does anything ever change there? Understatement is an understatement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

